Bojite li se Vi za opstanak FBiH?
- FBiH će dugoročno nestati.
Nadam se na osnovu političke odluke, a ne zbog teške ekonomske situacije?
- Ne znam, ali dugoročno će FBiH nestati.

---.

Mislim da je gospodin Mujezinovic u pravu kad kaze da ce FBiH dugorocno nestati.

Nema u tome ničega lošeg,samo nam može biti bolje da se skine silna birokracija sa vrata.

Nema u tome ničega lošeg,samo nam može biti bolje da se skine silna birokracija sa vrata.

Dijelim tvoje misljenje.

Koga mi zezamo, kakva birokracija...evo ako je o tome riječ odmah će ti "velikodušno" Bošnje ponuditi ukidanje svih kantona i općina. Al će se tu uštedit

Ako Bog da,samo dok napravimo nova općinska razgraničenja.Pa nek ukidaju svoje koliko hoće.

Bolje samo opcine i dati njima najvecu mogucu ovlast, da se zivi brate normalno.

Bolje samo opcine i dati njima najvecu mogucu ovlast, da se zivi brate normalno.

Heh, samo si i ti ostao nedorečen, složili ste se oko ukidanja Federacije, samo da se još složite oko onoga što bije trebalo naslijedit

Monarhija!!! Idemo nigdje... A u pm, otišao Branković, došao još jedan sposoban za ponavljanje do besvijesti... Po zakonu, po zakonu, po zakonu...

Paul Tvrtkovic, London, U.K. From March 1992 to October 1993 Paul Tvrtkovic acted as the Spokesman for the Government of the Republic of Bosnia-Hercegovina in London. He is a descendent of the mediaeval ruling family of Bosnia (whose family’s coat of arms have now been appropriated by the Government of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina as the state emblem, without permission). He was born in Sarajevo in 1927, and settled in London in 1955 where he continued to practice as an architect and lecturer. He has published a booklet “Bosnia- Hercegovina - Back to the Future” (London, 1993) and over the past 30 years has written many essays and articles on the Croato-Serbian conflict and related subjects in various international publications.

PROPOSAL FOR A JUST PEACE FOR BOSNIA-HERCEGOVINA

The plan that I published in 1993 was based, first and foremost, on the premise that the preservation of the state of Bosnia-Hercegovina is desirable, realistic and is in the long-term interest of all three parties, as well as for peace in that part of Europe. To prove that this is both desirable and the best of all the worst solutions, we have to dispose of the utopian solutions previously analysed. What we are left with then is a process of elimination of these impurities from present political and military thinking on the subject on the Bosnian- Hercegovinian conflict.

The most creative way to approach this subject is to look at what is worth retaining in this process. The essential element of any just solution, which must be either accepted in full or partly imposed, is that the ethnic map of Bosnia-Hercegovina must be retained as the ‘status quo ante’ the census of the year 1991. This includes the return of all the refugees to their homes and lands.

Apart from the fact that this prerequisite is essential for the future membership of the European Union, it is also the most pragmatic way of approaching the peace: to each his own.

It is apparent from the analysis of the previous utopian plans that the primary aim of all of them was (theoretically or factually) the imposition of political and military control and acquisition of territory, and only the secondary aim was the shifting, or extermination, of the population for the purpose of this aim. Utopian aims and programmes, by their very nature, recede and are very often forgotten by the protagonists half-way along the path to their unachievable end. In this case, the utopian aim of occupying and holding territories was bogged down in the impossible effort to divide Bosnia ethnically by force when really this was a secondary issue. Protracted cartography actually prolonged the war.

If we further pursue the creative idea that a just peace here can be achieved only if all the contestants both win and lose in equal proportions, then we come to the apparently contradictory conclusion that, in order to preserve the wholeness of Bosnia-Hercegovina, it is imperative to divide it.

The next question is how to achieve this division? When we consider the territorial division, the best possible option is not to indulge in re-inventing the wheel, i.e., re-inventing the regions, but to stick to the historical provinces (e.g., Hum, Vrhbosna, Podrinje, etc.) which developed organically, having taken into account historical, geopolitical and economical factors. The next step is the division of political control of these provinces between the Muslims, Croats and Serbs, and how to allocate it.

On the principle that all win and, at the same time, all lose, the obvious solution is that the territory of these provinces is divided equally, or almost equally, between the three contestants, a kind of Alexandrian cut of the Gordian knot. The reason that this should be acceptable, or nearly acceptable to all three sides, is again the use of creative and rational thinking rather than a utopian aim. The secret lies in the nature of that political control, which should be only an administrative and not a sovereign exercise of political power.

The final objective of this proposal would be the establishment of the Con-federation of Bosnia-Hercegovina on the cantonal pattern, as in Switzerland. However, as the wounds of this war, and fear and mistrust, will take a long time to heal, I propose a 50-year long EU protectorate with all sovereign powers, though with defence placed under the NATO military umbrella (see details in the attached Memorandum). 50 years of the Protectorate should be long enough for the stability and establishment of democratic institutions, and for the diffusion of this stability from the Bosnian epicentre to the rest of the Balkans. Only thus can the international intervention be justified and legitimised.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MEMORANDUM FOR A JUST PEACE FOR BOSNIA-HERCEGOVINA

FINAL OBJECTIVE The Confederation of the cantons of Bosnia-Hercegovina (Muslim, Croatian and Serbian). After 50 years as an EU Protectorate, the state to be called ‘Confederation of Bosnia- Hercegovina’.


PROCEDURE

By the setting up of a European Conference on Bosnia-Hercegovina, to include the USA and Russia.

DECISIONS OF THE CONFERENCE:

a) Imposition of a 50-year long European Union Protectorate in Bosnia-Hercegovina (precedent - Congress of Berlin 1878).
b) Establishment of administrative cantons of approximately equal total superficial areas without political sovereignty and without the right of secession. The administrative cantons will be as follows:
1. Croatian - (2 cantons) historical provinces of Vrhbosna and Hum with municipalities of Odzak, Bos. Samac, Orasje and Bos. Brod. Total area - 15,029 km2 . Total Population - 1,139,911 Croatian 497,223 Muslim 460,273 Serbian 182,415

2. Serbian - (2 cantons) historical provinces of Donji Kraji, Usora (with Bos. Novi and Bos. Dubica) and Travunja. Total area - 15,685 km2. Total Population - 646,538 Serbian 450,881 Muslim 133,700 Croatian 61,957

3. Muslim - (2 cantons) Bihac (without Bos. Novi and Bos Dubica), Podrinje and Soli (without Odzak, Bos. Samac, Orasje and Bos. Brod). Total area - 18,366 km2. Total Population - 1,780,418 Muslim 1,063,420 Croatian 159,192 Serbian 557,806

4. Sarajevo - (confederal area) 2,049 km2. Total Population - 382,418 Muslim 224,391 Serbian 127,002 Croatian 31,025

c) Each of the cantons to be administered by the Muslim, Croatian and Serbian adminis- tration respectively, under the supervision of a European Union Protector. Cantonal administrations will be developed on the basis of the political and cultural traditions of each national group (as in Switzerland), but not to the detriment to each of the others. They will include education, culture, media, social services, planning, energy, judiciary, civil and public services. Finance and development, local defence corps (under NATO supervision), police and tourism. Each of the cantons will be headed by a Governor (Zupan) and the Protectorate by the EU Protector (Ban).

The Sovereignty of the Protectorate will be within the EU for 50 years. During that time, the foreign policy of Bosnia-Hercegovina will be in the domain of the EU council, and the defence by the Home Defence corps under NATO supervision. The Sarajevo Government, the Herceg Bosnian and Republika Serbska governments will be extinguished. The Bosnia-Hercegovina Army, HVO and Serbian forces will be disbanded. After 50 years as an EU Protectorate, the final constitution of the Bosnian-Hercegovinian Confederation will be agreed on the basis that there is the State of Bosnia-Herzegovina but that there is no Bosnian Nation.

d) All the cantons to have a mixed population, according to the census of 1991, in order to balance out the unequal numbers of the three national groups.


MEANS OF ENFORCEMENT
NATO troops initially, with a continuous review of the security situation.

METHOD OF ENFORCEMENT

a) NATO to take control of the Serbian occupied areas and the territory under the Bosnian- Hercegovinian Government and HVO control.
b) NATO to train and control a well-paid voluntary Home Defence Corps made up of volunteers from all three Bosnia-Hercegovina nationalities, each to be stationed in their respective administrative territory, thereby reducing the number of NATO troops to an absolute minimum - estimated total number of militia 100,000.
c) Large economic aid financed mainly by the USA (in lieu of having their troops stationed in Bosnia-Hercegovina).


GAINS
a) Solving finally the national problem of Bosnia-Hercegovina, the root cause of this conflict.
b) Creating a democratic state and institutions in the heart of the Balkans.
c) Using the above for the control and stability of the Balkans and stopping future wars.
d) Eliminating the causes that can be used by Serbia as an excuse for future expansion (i.e. Great Serbia).
e) Preserving minority populations (Croat, Muslim, Serbian) in the cantons other than under their own administration.
f) Creating good co-operation with the neighbouring states of Croatia and Serbia.
g) Cultural, traditional and religious links between the Croatian cantons and the Republic of Croatia, the Serbian cantons and the Republic of Serbia and the Muslim cantons and the Islamic world will be guaranteed.

a da ovaj ne misli na ukidanje federacije i rs?pa meni to zvuci kao da prizeljkiva centralisticku drzavu,sto je tu pozitivno

Njegov mirovni plan: Konfederacija Bosna i Hercegovina:

Koga mi zezamo, kakva birokracija...evo ako je o tome riječ odmah će ti "velikodušno" Bošnje ponuditi ukidanje svih kantona i općina. Al će se tu uštedit

Bošnjaci silno žele ukinuti Kantone/županije,ali općine se ne mogu ukinuti,općina kao najniža jedinica(lokalne uprave i samouprave) mora postojat,tako je u svim normalnim državama svijeta,ali i u nenormalnoj BiH