Da i ja sam jos ranije hteo da replikujem na temu sta je zapravo u celoj prici levica, a sta liberalizam.

Ovde je to lepo objasnjeno, osnova liberlizma je nominalizam - prevedeno na srpski nema univerzalnih vrednosti.
Znaci ne postoji nesto kao vrsta konji, nego postoji samo konj, kada primenis tu filozofiju na sve ostale oblasti ljudske kulture i drustva, dolazis to toga da ni nacije ne postoje, pa ni pol, ni porodica, ni tradicija, ni moral itd.... postoji samo pojedinac.
E sada zasto se taj liberalizam povezuje sa levicom, mozda zato sto je levica na isti nacin izazivala tradicionalne drustvene strukture crkvu, kralja, patrijarhalne vrednosti, tako da tu ima neka slicnost.
Ali osnova levih filozofija bi trebala da bude borba za radnicka prava, borba za obespravljene, klasna borba itd...tu je razmimoilazenje u odnosu na liberalizam, jer su klasa, radnicka prava itd..univerzalne vrednosti.

Reparacije za potomke crnih robova prije 150 godina

Za:

Bijelci: 18%

Azijci: 33%

Hispanici: 39%

Crnci: 77%

The Leftist Personality: Left-Wing ideology as a biological phenomenon


Countless studies have shown that physical and psychological characteristics closely align with political orientation. This article covers some of the most significant findings and explores the origins of the Leftist personality type.

In brief: Leftists are shorter, uglier, weaker, less masculine, and less capable of fighting. They are more likely to exhibit manipulative, self-serving, and generally antisocial personality traits, including spite, narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism.

1. Defining “Leftism”

‘Leftism’ is characterized by ideas like equality, fraternity, “progress,” societal reform, and globalism. This manifests politically as support for feminism, homosexuality, wealth redistribution, immigration, and racial egalitarianism, combined with opposition to the family, nationalism, and traditional culture.

The rejection or embrace of hierarchy (i.e. inequality) is the fundamental difference between Left- and Right-Wing worldviews. Right-Wingers believe that hierarchy is inherent to reality and part of the natural order, while Leftists claim to believe that all men are fundamentally “equal” [1] [2].



2. Leftism and Physical Biology

Countless studies have shown that physical characteristics closely align with political orientation. AI facial recognition can accurately predict a person’s political alignment 72% of the time, outperforming chance (50%) and human estimation (55%) [3].

Taller [4] and more attractive [5] people are more likely to identify as Right-Wing and more likely to actively support Right-Wing parties, policies, and politicians. In America, Australia, and Europe, Right-Wing politicians are more likely to be physically attractive than their Left-Wing counterparts [6].

Men who are physically stronger are more likely to oppose wealth redistribution [7] and other forms of sociopolitical egalitarianism, even if they are poor themselves, and opposition to egalitarianism grows as men spend more time in the gym [8]. Similarly, men with more masculine facial features are more likely to support explicitly prejudiced ideas [9], and men who are better fighters are more likely to support warfare and hold “self-favoring” (non-Leftist) political beliefs [10].

In summary: Leftists are shorter and uglier, and Leftist men are weaker, less masculine, and less capable of fighting — characteristics that are not conducive to success in any human civilization.



3. Leftist Psychology 101

Studies on Left- and Right-Wing psychology have consistently found that Leftists are more likely to exhibit manipulative, self-serving, and generally antisocial personality traits. For example, Leftists have abnormally low disgust sensitivity [11]. A person’s political alignment can be predicted with 95% accuracy by observing their brain’s response to one disgusting image [12].

Despite Leftist claims that their ideology is “just being a good person,” support for wealth redistribution is best predicted by the psychological traits of “communal fairness” (egalitarianism), malicious envy, spite, being self-interested, and willingness to inflict “instrumental harm” (hurting innocent people for “the greater good”) [13]. The stereotypically Left-Wing behavior of “victimhood signaling” correlates with personality traits such as narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism (amoral manipulation) [14]. Victimhood signaling is best described as an emotional manipulation technique used to obtain free resources.



On average, Right-Wingers are much happier than Leftists. This phenomenon has been attributed to a variety of factors, including the ideological rationalization of inequality (“inequality is natural” vs “inequality is unfair”) [15]. However, the most logical explanation is that Leftists are predisposed to mental illness [16].

Numerous studies have found that Leftists are far more neurotic than Right-Wingers [17] and that White Far-Leftists are four times more mentally ill than moderate Right-Wingers. It is currently unclear whether Leftism causes mental illness or whether mentally ill people are instinctively drawn to Leftism. Both may be true simultaneously.

The psychological differences between Left- and Right-Wing people can be partially attributed to physical differences in brain structure. For example, Right-Wing views are associated with a larger amygdala [18], which is associated with higher emotional intelligence (e.g. reading facial cues or personal space) [19] and the ability to maintain more complex social networks [20]. The amygdala also plays a causal role in threat detection [21]. This data contradicts studies by Far-Left sociologists, like Alain Van Hiel, which claim that Right-Wing beliefs are defined by low emotional intelligence.

4. Left- and Right-Wing Moral Foundations

The Moral Foundations Theory was first proposed by psychology professor Jonathan Haidt and colleagues. It proposes that Left- and Right-Wing people base their worldviews on five major “Moral Foundations.”

Leftists are disproportionately high in the individualizing traits of Harm Avoidance and Fairness, but disproportionately low in the group-orientated traits of In-Group Loyalty, Respect for Authority, and Purity/Sanctity. In contrast, Right-Wingers express all five traits equally [22] [23].



Countless studies support the Moral Foundations theory, but one statistic related to in-group preference is particularly significant:

White Leftists, who are by far the most mentally ill demographic, have a negative in-group preference, meaning that they genuinely despise their own race and will always prioritize the group interests of foreign races above their own.



A 2019 study investigated the self-reported “moral circle” of Left- and Right-Wingers [24]. Participants were asked to assign 100 “moral units” to 16 categories, ranging from their “(1) immediate family” and “(2) closest friends” to “(15) all natural things in the universe” and “(16) all things in existence.” The categories did not overlap, so points attributed to ‘higher’ categories (e.g. the universe) were not shared with ‘lower’ categories (e.g. the family).

Leftists claimed to care more about “all natural things in the universe including inert entities, such as rocks” than they do about their own family and friends. They may disdain their friends and family, but the information listed in section 3 of this article casts doubt upon the sincerity of their “universal love.” It seems much more likely that an immoral, narcissistic, manipulative psychopath would only claim to be the most “loving” person in the world to conceal their malevolent, self-serving intentions. It’s empty, performative virtue signaling.



5. Conclusion: A profile of the average Leftist

Using the data compiled above, we can construct a basic psychological profile of the typical Leftist. This will not apply to every Left-Wing individual, but it can serve as a general framework for understanding and dealing with Leftists. So, generally speaking…

Leftists believe that life is fundamentally unfair, likely due to their undesirable physical characteristics (shortness, ugliness, weakness, etc.).

This causes neuroticism and leads to self-obsession and spiteful envy.

They lose all concern for group interests and focus exclusively on advancing their own standing in society.

As they cannot get ahead in fair competition, they resort to underhanded, manipulative, and psychopathic strategies.

This manifests as behaviors like victimhood/virtue signaling, gaslighting, and other forms of coercion and emotional abuse.

To disguise their nefarious and self-serving aims, they proclaim a universal love for humanity, nature, or the even entire material universe.

They collaborate with other outcasts and potentially dangerous out-groups to exact vengeance on their perceived “oppressors,” by which they mean normal people.

However, they will happily betray (“cancel”) their friends and allies, who they value as little as inert objects like rocks, for social gains.

Leftist ideology can thus be summarized as an attempt to climb the social ladder via underhanded tactics, such as eliminating the competition by promoting “equality,” i.e. dragging everyone down to their level: The gutter. Leftism is a strategy for losers to take power and resources from winners.

The key takeaway is this: When it comes to Leftists, we are not dealing with honest people who want what is best for society but are tragically mistaken about how this can be achieved. Such individuals certainly exist on the Left, but the average Leftist is spiteful, malicious, and vindictive. They cannot be reasoned with or rationally convinced of their “mistakes” because they are driven by deep-rooted biological and psychological issues that, in many cases, cannot be resolved. Use extreme caution when dealing with them. They would think nothing of using the system to destroy your life.

Vijetnamski rat je kriv za to. Prosvjedi i neredi koje je "ljevica" pravila. "Democrats" su vidjeli da tim budaletinama moraju preoteti "ljevicu" i uspjeli su u tome.

Istina, evo u Austriji ni danasnji strajk zeljeznice nisu podrzali - pregovori o platama za iducu godinu. Sindikati - vazda support.

Why the US Women's team will earn more from the men's World Cup than 2019 win



The US women's national football team will earn more from the men's World Cup than they did from their own title winning performances in 2019 and 2015.

USA's men are guaranteed $13m in prize money for managing to qualify for the knockout stages of the Qatar tournament after beating Iran 1-0 on Tuesday.

The men's win over Iran increased their World Cup prize money to approximately $380,000 for each player in the squad.

That prize money will be shared equally between both the men's and women's teams under the equal pay agreement struck between US Soccer and the USWNT Player's Association earlier this year - with 10% of the total prize money going to the US Soccer Federation.

https://biopolitics.substack.com/p/the- ... -left-wing

Turbotakija jel ovo točno?

Mi stojimo postojano kano klisurine. Proklet bio izdajica svoje domovine.

.....

da su ljevičari psihički ili fizički bolesnici je jasno, važnije je zašto se bolest toliko raširila

Prestankom evolutivnih pritisaka i visoke smrtnosti novorođenčadi i dece, što je ranije bio filter koji je uklanjao iz populacije fizički i mentalno slabe osobe, došlo je do drastičnog porasta broja individua sa disgeničnim mutacijama a koje imaju veći fertilitet od zdravih jedinki.

podatci pokazuju da danas ljevičari imaju znatno NIĆI fertilitet od desničara, ali već utjecaj na mlade.

da je samo do fertiliteta, ljevica bi izumrla odavno.

mislim da se bolest širi memeovima, a ne genima

Svako društvo koje propada obuzme isti splet poremećaja kao što su propagiranje prava žena