Pa gđice Audrey sami ste izjavili da živite u europskom okrženju Šveđana to nije tor?
Tako i Sarajlije tvrde da oni ne žive u toru a Sarajevo 95% muslimansko.

Kad se držite tih načela zašto getoizirate Arape, zašto ne upoznate i asimilirate dio njihove kulture, zašto ih odvajate?

by Ingrid Carlqvist
March 26, 2016 at 5:00 am

Translation of the original text: Sverige? Negativ bild? Vad menar ni?
Translated by Maria Celander

Adult migrants with residence permits now have a right to bypass Swedes in waiting lists for housing. There is a massive shortage of housing, which has led to young Swedes, well into their 30s, being forced to live with their parents.

No one seems to have given any thought as to where all the people who are granted asylum in Sweden are supposed to live. There is a massive shortage of housing, which has led to young Swedes, well into their 30s, being forced to live with their parents.

In 2014, a report from the Swedish Union of Tenants (Hyresgästföreningen) disclosed that close to 300,000 young people between the ages of 20-27 do not have their own place to live. The Immigration Service has the right to send "unaccompanied refugee children," who are often, in fact, undocumented adults, to the local municipalities -- and then it is their problem to procure accommodation.

It was also recently reported that adult migrants with residence permits have a right to bypass Swedes in waiting lists for housing. The municipality of Skellefteå now plans to inventory all the empty houses in the countryside, looking for possible alternatives for migrants.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7687/ ... tive-image

Kolega Hunter, pazite komentar ispod tog klipa sto ste postavili:

"Harald Nordmann för 2 månader sedan
Keep projecting your sick fantasies cock, I keep reading Russian cocksuckers writing that Sweden should be "nuked", "raped by niggers" and "be left alone" for being brainwashed when the fact is that every western country is in a similar situation, heck the UK and Germany are both in a worse situation, Sweden has the most active nazis per capita and one of the biggest amount of rifles per capita owned by the ethnic Swedish population. If you look at opinion polls the general population does not agree with the KGB-media on any of the "open-border/we're all equal" nonsense. When shit hits the fan Swedes will save themselves."

Good luck with that.

Jos jedna Turkinja morala napustiti Greens stranku za okolis. Negirala genocid nad Armencima.
Jesu navalili u tu stranku. Nesto kao da u HR navale kod Mirele Holy. Drzite ih na oku ako odjednom navale na "okolis" i "ljudska prava".

Ta dobro, budemo vidjeli. Ja odgovorno tvrdim da druge zemlje u Evropi, imaju veci problem sa migrantima (ali i raznoraznim drugim problemima) nego Svedska. Svedjani uvijek pronadju nacin da rijese svoje probleme.

To sto si prilozio sa Wikipedia je isti raport.

Sto se silovanja i slicnog tice:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... s_2012.png

This is probably the favorite chart of any anti-immigration activist on the internet. It clearly shows that, as a result of Sweden's liberal immigration policy and overly humane refugee acceptance, the country has now become a hellscape where blue-eyed women are raped daily by Muslims and blacks. As much so that now there are more per capita rapes in Sweden than in Bolivia.

There are two major problems with these statistics.
I. "In Sweden there has been this ambition explicitly to record every case of sexual violence separately, to make it visible in the statistics," according to Klara Selin, a sociologist at the National Council for Crime Prevention in Stockholm. "So, for instance, when a woman comes to the police and she says my husband or my fiance raped me almost every day during the last year, the police have to record each of these events, which might be more than 300 events. In many other countries it would just be one record - one victim, one type of crime, one record."
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-19592372

This technical note renders this whole comparison meaningless, but let's go further, because the second point is more interesting.
II. As everyone who has ever studied criminology knows, in the case of rape, there is insane latency rates. If there is willingness to report rape, the number will skyrocket in any country. In countries where rape remains associated with a strong taboo and a high level of shame, the propensity to report such offences probably tends to be lower than in countries characterized by a higher level of sexual equality. The findings of the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey indicate that the respondents' satisfaction with the police is above average in Sweden. Sweden has also been ranked number one in sexual equality.

In addition, there is also the issue of the broad legal definition of rape in Sweden.
If you are going to assess how much of a hellscape Sweden has become as a result of immigration based on a single piece of statistical data, I advise using another violent crime where latency is significantly lower; just to be one step closer to the truth, if that matters at all. There is the murder rate, for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... e_rate.svg

"In 58% of cases, the perpetrator was entirely unknown by the victim. In 29% of cases the perpetrator was an acquaintance, and in 13% of cases the perpetrator was a person close to the victim."

Brå reports that there are no major differences between women of Swedish and foreign background when it comes to the risk of being raped.

Is there a correspondence between the incidence of rape and the number of people with a foreign background in Sweden?

Is there a correspondence between the incidence of rape and some specific group of immigrants in Sweden?

The answer to both questions was an unequivocal Yes. Twenty-one research reports from the 1960s until today are unanimous in their conclusions: Whether or not they measured by the number of convicted rapists or men suspected of rape, men of foreign extraction were represented far more than Swedes. And this greater representation of persons with a foreign background keeps increasing:

1960-1970s – 1.2 to 2.6 times as often as Swedes
1980s – 2.1 to 4.7 times as often as Swedes
1990s – 2.1 to 8.1 times as often as Swedes
2000s – 2.1 to 19.5 times as often as Swedes

How is it, then, that in 2008, Sweden's neighbor Denmark only had 7.3 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants compared to 53.2 in Sweden?

Danish legislation is not very different from Sweden's, and there is no obvious reason why Danish women should be less inclined to report rape than their Swedish counterparts.

In 2011, 6,509 rapes were reported to the Swedish police -- but only 392 in Denmark. The population of Denmark is about half the size of Sweden's, so even adjusted for size, the discrepancy is significant.

In Sweden, the authorities do what they can to conceal the origin of the rapists. In Denmark, the state's official statistical office, Statistics Denmark, revealed that in 2010 more than half of convicted rapists had an immigrant background.

Since 2000, there has only been one research report on immigrant crime. It was done in 2006 by Ann-Christine Hjelm from Karlstads University.

It emerged that in 2002, 85% of those sentenced to at least two years in prison for rape in Svea Hovrätt, a court of appeals, were foreign born or second-generation immigrants.

A 1996 report by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention reached the conclusion that immigrants from North Africa (Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia) were 23 times as likely to commit rape as Swedish men. The figures for men from Iraq, Bulgaria and Romania were, respectively, 20, 18 and 18. Men from the rest of Africa were 16 times more prone to commit rape; and men from Iran, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia, 10 times as prone as Swedish men.

Koliko vidim, postoji ozbiljna studija koja je poklopila sva ta nazovi objašnjenja.

Još bih i mogao prihvatiti argument da je razlog za epidemiju silovanja u Švedskoj samo statistička varka ili veća sklonost prijavljivanju nego u drugim zemljama, da u Švedskoj ne postoji značajan i rapidno rastući element koji dolazi iz nazovi kultura gdje ženski život ne vrijedi ni pišljive bobe.

No, dobro, tvoja je zemlja, razumijem instinkt za zatvaranjem očiju. Pa i nekom balkanskom servilnošću prema "višom rasom" Šveđanima, koji po tebi, imaju nevjerojatnu inteligenciju i sposobnosti da sve drže pod kontrolom. Naravski, pod uvjetom da nisi muslimanskog bakcgrounda pa borgovski braniš suplemenike.

Šteta Švedske, ali podržavam i tvoje i državno zatvaranje očiju pred ovim problemima. Švedska (i nadam se Njemačka) mora platiti skupu, najskuplju, cijenu, i to što brže, kako bi svojom žrtvom spasila važnije zemlje. S obzirom da je Captain Sweden i Sweden Yes jedna od najpoznatijih zaštitnih znakova Švedske u Anglosferi (koja mi je važnija od Švedske), još jednom veliko hvala.

Threatened with throat-slitting and slaughter: Christian persecution in Swedish asylum centres

In 2015, Sweden welcomed more than 160,000 asylum seekers, the majority of whom were from Syria and other war zones.

Christians and other religious minorities are being persecuted in Swedish asylum centres, and provisions must be made for their safety, campaigners say.

According to the Swedish Evangelical Alliance, one Christian refugee in Kalmar, south-eastern Sweden, was threatened with “slaughter”, and having his throat cut by a man who claimed to have fought with jihadist groups in Syria. A Pakistani Christian couple moved into a church when the husband’s name was sprayed on a wall near their room calling for his death. A separate group of asylum seekers in Kalmar were forced to leave their accommodation when their harassment escalated.

“No one wants a society where people are divided up on the basis of religious beliefs, sexuality, ethnicity, or nationality, but this is an urgent situation that must be resolved,” said Jacob Rudolfsson, deputy secretary-general of the Swedish Evangelical Alliance.

“Basic protection should be provided by the state, but when the state fails to protect Christian asylum seekers, Christian organizations must take action.”

In a letter dated March 14, Patriarch Ignatuis Aphrem II, Supreme Head of the Universal Syrian Orthodox Church, urged Swedish authorities to intervene.

He said he was “dismayed” by reports of Christians being harassed while in asylum accommodation. “This situation does not reflect the culture of the peaceful and loving Swedish people,” he wrote.
Reuters
Sweden has struggled to cope with the influx of refugees, and last year ended its open border policy.

“Christians do not live in refugee camps in the Middle East, because, there too, they are persecuted by Muslim extremists. Because of that, most of the time, they are not entitled to aid from the UN. We, the Churches and community-based organizations, are doing our best to help them.

“To witness that they are once more being persecuted at Swedish asylum accommodations make[s] us very sad. We expect the Swedish Government and the concerned authorities to immediately make sure that these people are safe.

“A distinct asylum accommodation for Christians and other asylum seekers is essential. We appeal to you to set off such a place and give the word asylum back its true meaning of protection and safety.”

In his response, director general of the Swedish Migration Board, Anders Danielsson, highlighted Sweden’s long tradition of helping those fleeing war and persecution.

In 2015, the country welcomed more than 160,000 asylum seekers, the majority of whom were from Syria and other war zones. As of March 2016, there were around 180,000 people enrolled in the Swedish reception system, nearly 100,000 of whom were staying in accommodation provided by the Swedish Migration Agency.

Danielsson admitted that the unprecedented number of refugees coming to Sweden means standards of accommodation had been lowered.

“When so many, sometimes traumatized, asylum seekers are housed close together for a long time, there is an increased risk of tensions and conflicts between individuals,” he said. “We are very much aware that asylum seekers sometimes bring with them conflicts that exist in their home country, such as conflicts involving Christian minorities or other vulnerable groups, and we look very seriously at the need to ensure that everyone feels safe and secure in their living environment.”

However, calls for separate housing for Christians and other vulnerable groups “would go against principles and values that are central to Swedish society and our democracy,” he said. “It would be considered a great failure having to resort to segregation as a measure.”

Despite this, the Migration Board is in the process of carrying out an action plan to improve conditions for asylum seekers, Danielsson added, and individuals and families experiencing specific harassment may be moved to alternative accommodation.

“We are currently examining the possibilities of offering a limited range of special housing for individuals that feel unsafe where they are staying due to the behaviour of others. These facilities would be open for anyone in need of a safer place regardless of nationality of religious beliefs,” he said. “The safeguarding of the right to asylum for those facing persecution for religious or other reasons is at the heart of what we do at the Swedish Migration Agency. We will continue to make every effort to provide safe reception conditions and ensure protection for those in need of sanctuary.”

Morgan Johnson, the Swedish Minister of Justice, also wrote to Patriarch Aphrem to assure him that “bullying or harassment based on someone’s faith, gender, sexuality or race, is not tolerated in any way” in reception facilities.

“The Migration Agency is working to increase the amount of available housing and I hope this will ease the tensions,” he added.

Nuri Kino, founder of A Demand for Action (ADFA), a campaign group working for the rights of religious minorities in the Middle East, said not enough has yet been done.

In a recent article for Sweden’s daily newspaper Svenska Dagbladet, he branded the situation at a number of shelters “alarming”, and said many refugees had been forced to flee. “It’s mostly Christians, Atheists, Druze and moderate Muslims that are being discriminated [against] by Islamic radicals,” he wrote.

“We have to speak openly about what is happening in our country… before it’s too late. I am not in favour of further polarization but there are lives at stake if we do not speak up. Innocent people are victims here, Christians, Muslims and others.”

Kino is therefore leading charges to open accommodation for Christian asylum seekers who do not feel safe in existing facilities. Speaking to Christian Today, Kino said he felt compelled to campaign on the matter after being contacted by two women who were being threatened. They said they were told to convert to Islam and cover their heads by other asylum seekers, and they and their children were called “kuffar” – infidels. Eventually, a Muslim family moved into their room, forcing them to sleep in a common area without any privacy.

Kino began writing in Svenska Dagbladet in December, and was immediately inundated with hundreds of texts, emails and messages on social media. “I got more than 400 messages, all from people who were working in shelters, asylum seekers themselves, people from the authorities, the police, the migration agency, even from parliamentarians, saying: we’re aware of this, and we need to get a grip on the situation.”

Since then, the issue has been debated in parliament and government a number of times, though no concrete plans have been put in place. “It’s still uncertain,” Kino said. “Still people are being harassed and beaten up, it’s a mess… It’s very sad. Sweden cannot protect them as it looks like today. Many are Christians, and also moderate Muslims are treated the same way.”

There is some good news on the ground, though. Kino said while the Migration Agency has not yet taken action from the top, people who work in the shelters are trying to deal swiftly with the problem. Some have employed people from the Middle East who understand the situation better, and some individuals are even paying private rent for families who have been mistreated.

“I believe it’s not that the government or Migration Agency don’t want to take action, it’s just that it would be too much of a failure for the Swedish multicultural identity. It’s too much to bear,” he said.

“But until we get to grips with the situation, we need to make everyone feel safe. End of discussion. It’s been debated too much, too many times, and it’s enough now. We need to take action.”

“It is obvious that we are not able to protect them at the existing accommodations,” Kino said. “We cannot live on with the romantic idea of a harmonious mosaic of religions and ethnicity in our accommodations for asylum seekers, that time is past.”

THE PROBLEM WITH SWEDEN’S STATE-APPROVED PRESS
DANIEL THILÉN
Swedish newspapers must cut the umbilical cord to the authorities.

21 APRIL 2016

weden’s newspaper industry has been facing financial challenges for more than a decade. Many local newspapers have long since cut down on editorial staff, merged with competitors or simply given up. At the same time, alternative online media channels have flourished. Yet while in many other countries traditional, mainstream newspapers have been forced to adapt to the new environment or go under, in Sweden some have found another way forward: an ever-closer relationship with the state.

This was made possible over 50 years ago, when Swedish politicians decided that the state was to finance political parties’ opinion-forming. At the time, the money was directly transferred to the parties, which distributed it to loyal or self-owned newspapers. This system was changed in the early 1970s so that funding no longer passed through political parties. Still, since 1971, Swedish taxpayers have spent 26 billion krona (£2.2 billion) keeping Sweden’s traditional newspapers going, and over 85 per cent of this funding has gone to newspapers with an official political designation.

Newspapers tied to the Social Democrats have received almost half of all subsidies. Those tied to the Centre Party have received four billion krona. In 2005, the Centre Party sold its media companies for 1.7 billion krona (£146million) and became one of the richest political parties in Europe.

Political parties haven’t been the only beneficiaries of state largesse. Crony capitalists have also maximised their subsidies by creating multiple small newspapers perfectly matching the state’s requirements. Elsewhere, the Communist Party’s newspaper has received over 90million krona (£7.7million) since 1975, and liberal Svenska Dagbladet obtains more than 10 per cent of the annual press support.

It could be seen as a good thing that the government funds platforms for a diversity of political views. But, in truth, state funding has created an inflexible and uncritical media. Too many newspapers show an unwillingness to bite the hand that feeds; they tone down critical views towards the state, especially state subsidies to all sorts of other industries.

This has not gone unnoticed by the public, who routinely mistrust traditional and state-owned media. And with good reason, as a recent incident illustrated. In January, the libertarian-leaning alternative news site Nyheter Idag (NI) revealed how one of Sweden’s biggest newspapers Dagens Nyheter (DN) received information about a spate of sexual assaults in August 2015 similar to that which occurred in Cologne on New Year’s Eve. A source contacted DN, which was interested in the story until the backgrounds of the arrested were discovered — ‘so-called refugee youths primarily from Afghanistan’.

DN denied NI’s accusations. A couple of days later, the news site KIT, owned by the same company as DN, questioned the NI journalist’s integrity, even exposing his financial problems. DN then published an article describing NI as a ‘hate site’, citing the NI journalist’s previous involvement with the right-wing Sweden Democrats as proof.

Across the political spectrum, many feel mainstream media fail to cover some of the hottest topics of public debate. For example, the website Inte rasist, men, run by left-leaning activists investigating the Sweden Democrats and anti-migration media coverage, was born of frustration with traditional state-funded media. It felt that Sweden’s mainstream media failed to cover too many topics that people wanted to discuss. And it was right: Inte rasist, men now has 180,000 followers on Facebook, more than the state-owned TV channel SVT, which has an annual budget of over four billion krona.

The media project I am involved in, bubb.la, is a news aggregator linking to a large variety of sources. Yet when we’ve shared news only reported by anti-migration media channels, we’ve been accused by mainstream media of having a hidden racist agenda. Or if we’ve shared an article about a political decision not reported in the mainstream media, we’ve been accused of having dubious sources.

Mainstream media will continue to struggle for as long as their eyes are fixed on state subsidies and they continue to slander media covering areas they ignore. There is clearly an audience out there for alternative, non-state-funded media, as the plethora of successful podcasts, blogs and other media projects show. The media environment has been changing for a long time and if Swedish newspapers are to survive they need to cut the umbilical cord to the state and look for a truly independent funding strategy.
Daniel Thilén is volunteer editor at Corax.