Sličan je obrazac i kod birača. Desnica najbolje prolazi u siromašnim ruralnim krajevima Slavonije i unutrašnjosti Dalmacije, dok u gradovima ili bogatijim krajevima teže

prvo što treba istaći je da obrazovaniji desničari imaju veću sklonos prironim, tehničkim i medicinskim strukama. tu ima dosta desnijih.

Zanimljivo bi bilo istražiti fenomen nedostatka desne inteligencije i političke misli u zemlji gdje ista dominira sa barem 60% podrške u narodu.

Ljevica svakim danom kopni, ali nikada im ne fali profesora, liječnika itd. kao da ih vade iz šešira, dok je među mlađom populacijom dosta teško pronaći ljude takvih stavova.

Desnica se pak očito mući iz tako široke baze stanovništva izvući par autentičnih predstavnika naroda. Kao da ljudi putem nekako ispare.

Imamo primjer bračnog para Rasudić i to je više manje to. Ostali desničari su ljudi više manje prosječnog intelekta i razine obrazovanja.

Kako to? kako to?

Mimikrija, nije se popularno istaknuti, možeš ugroziti karijeru, desničari često glume u javnosti da podržavaju neke lijeve stavove ili da su blagonakloni, a onda nasamo kažu što misle.

Uspješno su ušutkani, velikim dijelom i s tim što kod nas još dominira stara desnica s kojom se teško identificirati jer su im teme koje dominiraju iz 20. stoljeća.

Ja nisam stekao taj dojam. Možda je tako u mom okruženju. Dosta IT-evaca želi nomaditi po svijetu, skroz su liberalni i iznimno malo je religioznih. Sigurno ima više religioznih među npr. učiteljicama u školi.

Iako u americi možda zaista je tako kad se na društvenim fakultetima forsiraju pronouns i slične stvari koje odbijaju bilo koga tko nije na toj ideološkoj liniji.

Rekao bih više da je uletio u nišu koja je bila prazna i koja šeta lijevo-desno, ali ne bih ga nazvao desničarem. Centrist, više. I to liberalni.

Ako među desničarima nedostaje inteligencije onda je to za podforum psihologija.

općenito je to problem s midvitima u tim statistikama. recimo i kod religioznosti se to navodi, kako su ateisti prosječno inteligentniji. zapravo se radi o tome da su niskointeligentni ljudi intuitivni, a religioznost je intuitivna. kad gledaš stvarno inteligentne ljude, postotak religoznih je prosječan, ali među midvitima je ispodprosječan, a kod niskointelegntnih iznadprosječan. zato jer su midviti preseratori koji vole izigravati naprednost, a niskointeligentni su intuitivni.

To investigate, Daws and Hampshire surveyed more than 63,000 people online, and had them complete a 30-minute set of 12 cognitive tasks that measured planning, reasoning, attention and working memory. The participants also indicated whether they were religious, agnostic or atheist.

As predicted, the atheists performed better overall than the religious participants, even after controlling for demographic factors like age and education. Agnostics tended to place between atheists and believers on all tasks. In fact, strength of religious conviction correlated with poorer cognitive performance. However, while the religious respondents performed worse overall on tasks that required reasoning, there were only very small differences in working memory.

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from -.20 to -.25 (mean r = -.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

In the corroboration of these studies, intelligence and religious belief were found to be negatively correlated by comparing the percentage of believers among the elites in relation to the general population. This was shown in 1921 in a survey of the religious beliefs of eminent scientists and American researchers found that 39% said they believed in God (with a range from 48% for historians to 24% among psychologists ) (Leuba, 1921). It was reported by Roe (1965) that among a group of 64 prominent scientists, 61 were indifferent to religion, “which leaves about 4.8% believers. This is much lower than the percentage of believers in the population of which 95.5% in the United States declared that they believed in God in 1948 Gallup Poll (Argyle, 1958). In the 1990s, a study of members of the American National Academy of Sciences reported that 7% believed in the existence of God, compared to about 90% in a poll of the general population (Larsen and Witham 1998). In Britain, it was reported that 3.3% of fellows of the Royal Society believed in the existence of God, while 78.8% do not believe (the rest were undecided) (Dawkins, 2006). At the same time, a survey revealed that 68.5% of the total population believes in the existence of God.

The first are based on the Terman cohort of the gifted, started in 1921 by Lewis Terman, a psychologist at Stanford University. (The cohort is still being followed.) In the study, Terman recruited more than 1,500 children whose IQ exceeded 135 at the age of 10. Two studies used this data, one conducted by Robin Sears at Columbia University in 1995 and the other by Michael McCullough at the University of Miami in 2005, and they found that “Termites,” as the gifted are called, were less religious when compared to the general public.

What makes these results remarkable is not just that these gifted folks were less religious, something that is seen among elite scientists as well, but that 60 percent of the Termites reported receiving “very strict” or “considerable” religious training while 33 percent received little training. Thus, almost all of the gifted Termites grew up to be less religious.

The second set of studies is based on students of New York’s Hunter College Elementary School for the intellectually gifted. This school selects its students based on a test given at a young age. To study their religiosity, graduates of this school were queried when they were between the ages of 38 and 50. They all had IQs that exceeded 140, and the study found that only 16 percent of them derived personal satisfaction from religion (about the same number as the Termites).

So while the Hunter study did not control for factors such as socioeconomic status or occupation, it did find that high intelligence at a young age preceded lower belief in religion many years later.

Evo još malo o istoj temi. IQ najnadarenija djeca izrastaju u prosjeku u najmanje religiozne osobe.



Dakle, neovisno što je velik broj primio vrlo strog religijski odgoj, a dio blagi religijski odgoj opet je ishod isti. Veća inteligencija - manja religioznost.

To je simptom. Inteligentan čovjek se osjeća superioran i u stvari i jest. Ta moć stvara uobraženost što je pravi uzrok. Veća uobraženost -> manja religioznost.

Uobražen čovjek može biti zbog inteligencije, ali isto tako zbog puno drugih stvari, velikog bogatstva, popularnosti, političke vlasti, time što je nečiji sin itd. U narodu je to odavno poznato kao "sila Boga ne moli".

Upravo su slabo inteligentni ljudi skloni misliti da su jako pametni, dok intelignetni shvaćaju koliko toga ne znaju.

https://www.ideatovalue.com/curi/nicksk ... are-smart/

Ako se koncentriraš, vidjet ćeš da nisam ništa napisao o pameti.

Osim toga, ideja da netko ne vjeruje u goruće grmove i leteće konje jer je "uobražen" je u najmanju ruku kretenska

Nisam spomenuo ni goruće grmove ni leteće konje. Ne znam što ti je danas...