Hvatao se za efemerne stvari, nebitno jel kolonija ili dr.

Primarne i fundamentalne stvari namerno preskačeš.
Srb je imala 4 rata i sa NATO, spoljni zid sankcija od 91.
Odjeb od Jeljcina, čak i dotur oružja.
Srbi nisu proterali 400;k Hrvata, Mađara na prikolice, da bi uvozili...veća država, više ljudi, % se manje osete obojeni.

Mislim da su mizerni dobici u takvim okolnostima.

Još su Ameri rekli no, no, za BL. Očito imaju druge planove...možda Vel Srb, možda još 1 krvavi rat,

gde pobednik kupi šnjur i crta granice, po modelu Ukr.

Možda RH uzme Petrovaradin, Zemun, NBG, Boku, Trebinje, Ist Hercegovinu....možda....

Ameri vam ne misle ništa dobro (ni nama, ali znamo da su zlikovci i zlotvora). Tako da oni pripremaju krvav rat, koji
ne žele lokalci....vidi pod Saborima, huškanje u RH, FBiH.

a možda bude nešto mnogo drugačije

Ispade raspalo Brčko ko Monte Karlo.
Doseljava svetski džet set, traži se m2 više.

Zašto Hrv ne pokupuju tu i dosele, kao i u Derventi, Brod, BL..i na izborima opštinskim preuzmu i oblikuju.
Cene tamo niske, ljudi sele, demografija trula.
Lepo je nadati se i maštati. Legitimno i slatko.

Ali dobro je to, da pamtimo, da kada dodjemo...

Ne zbog Brčkog nego zbog napada Hrvatske na Srpsku.

Srbija se ponašala samoubilački. Srljala je u ratove i gubila ih.

Srbija se i danas ponaša kao alkoholičar. Ne može se suočiti sa stvarnošću. Uzima opojna sredstva, pjeva borbene, pa tavori do triježnjenja. Zatim opet ponavlja ciklus. Dugoročno propada.

Tu je bitna razlika. RS želi razvaliti postojeće stanje u Distriktu Brčko u kojem su Srbi samo trećina stanovništva nasuprot volji SAD-a, EU, NATO, Hrvatske, Hrvata i Bošnjaka iz FBiH te Hrvata i Bošnjaka distriktualaca.

Nasuprot tome, Hrvatska želi sačuvati postojeće stanje i interesi joj se poklapaju sa svima navedenima u pogledu budućnosti Distrikta.

Mi ne gubimo vrijeme na Petrovaradin i Zemun. U tome je ključna razlika između Hrvatske i Srbije. I zato je Hrvatska funkcionalna članica EU i NATO.

Amerikanci su vama zlotvori koji su vam uzeli "Kosmet". Nama su saveznici u NATO-u s kojima imamo bezvizni režim.
SACEUR je upravo sada na konferenciji u Splitu, a jučer se sastao s hrvatskim državnim vrhom u Zagrrbu.

Madame Nhu: “Whoever has the Americans as allies does not need any enemies.”
Prijevod: "Kome god su Amerikanci saveznici, ne treba nikakve neprijatelje".
Objašnjenje: Jer se Amerikanci ponašaju kao neprijatelji prema svojim saveznicima.

Btw, općina Trebinje je od točke nekih 5 km zapadno od grada Trebinja pa sve do svoje zapadne granice potpuno prazna. I mi to znamo. Na cijelom tom potezu jedini obrađeni dio Popova polja je onaj u hrvatskoj općini Ravno.

Niste čak ni saveznik Rusije. Srbija je vojno neutralna i usput prodaje granate Ukrajini uz nadu da će Rusi razumjeti.

Hrvati su vam jedini prijatelj.

Situacija je kao septembra 1918. Tek probijen Solunski front, i vi nas cekate. Prosli smo tada albansku golgotu, kao i ove postjugoslovenske golgote, ali smo ostali svoji.

Svestski poredak se rusi, a admiral DDL predvidja da posle njega nece biti Hrvatske.

A vi pri raspadu svetskog, cuvate nekakav poredak BrckoDistrikta. Ali dobro je to, da pamtimo, da kada dodjemo, da nas opet ne prevarite kao 1918. placuci "dobro dosli srpski oslobodioci, neumrli junaci nasi"...

Malo o temi
Aneks 5 Dejtonskog sporazuma
Annex 5:
Agreement on Arbitration
The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska agree to honor the following obligations as set forth in the Agreed Basic Principles adopted at Geneva on September 8, 1995, by the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia, and the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the latter representing also the Republika Srpska:
Paragraph 2.4. "The two entities will enter into reciprocal commitments. . .(c) to engage in
binding arbitration to resolve disputes between them."
Paragraph 3. "The entities have agreed in principle to the following:... 3.5 The design and
implementation of a system of arbitration for the solution of disputes between the two entities."
For the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
For the Republika Srpska

Malo o temi
Aneks 5 Dejtonskog sporazuma
Annex 5:
Agreement on Arbitration
The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska agree to honor the following obligations as set forth in the Agreed Basic Principles adopted at Geneva on September 8, 1995, by the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia, and the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the latter representing also the Republika Srpska:
Paragraph 2.4. "The two entities will enter into reciprocal commitments. . .(c) to engage in
binding arbitration to resolve disputes between them."
Paragraph 3. "The entities have agreed in principle to the following:... 3.5 The design and
implementation of a system of arbitration for the solution of disputes between the two entities."
For the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
For the Republika Srpska

The parties to the 1992-95 conflict could not agree at Dayton about the Inter-Entity Boundary Line in the Brčko area. However, rather than go back to war, they agreed in Annex 2 of the Dayton Peace Accords to an arbitration that would be final and binding on all parties. After a first and supplemental award, the Arbitral Tribunal issued the Final Award and Annex in 1999, establishing the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Since its establishment, Brčko District has gone from being a symbol of social and physical devastation to one of progress and inter-ethnic cooperation, as well as an incubator for reforms in the transition from communist command economy to democratic market economy.

Today, Brčko is a prosperous, multiethnic community whose territory exists as a condominium of the two Entities, but with its own local institutions of self government to which the Entities are deemed to have permanently delegated their powers of governance.

Brčko District has become a post-conflict success story studied by many, envied by some, and copied by none.
That could be because its success has depended first and foremost on the efforts and willingness of the people of Brčko, who decided to live together, and in peace. The courage of District leaders and officials of the interim government and Assembly, assisted by the International Community through the Supervisory regime established by the First Award of February 14, 1997, also contributed to the outcome.

The legal foundations for Brčko District are found in two annexes to the Dayton Peace Agreement: Annex 4, which is the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina; and Annex 2, in which the parties agreed to binding arbitration, as well as the Awards, Annexes, and addendum thereto issued by the Arbitral Tribunal in consistency with the Constitution.

It was the Final Award that required development of the Statute, which has been updated several times to improve the structure, efficiency, and procedures of District governance in a way where no one group can dominate another.

In light of steady and substantial progress made in implementation of the Final Award of the Arbitral Tribunal for the Dispute Over the Inter-Entity Boundary in Brčko Area (Final Award) over a period of years, and following extensive consultation within the International Community and with the citizens of Brčko and their representatives, the High Representative closed the office in Brčko on 31 August 2012, and the Supervisor suspended his functions from the same date.

The decision to close the Office, and suspend the functions of the Supervisor, was a significant step in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s long road to full post-war recovery. It reflected the international community’s assessment that real progress had already been made in the District, and illustrates the International Community’s resolve to support Bosnia and Herzegovina’s recovery by helping it to develop the institutional capacity that will allow it to move forward under its own steam, and then step aside when that capacity has developed.

That said, safeguards remain. The Brčko Tribunal’s jurisdiction will continue to exist until the Supervisor, with the approval of the High Representative, notifies the Tribunal that the conditions for its closure have been met. Bosnia and Herzegovina’s highest judicial body – the Constitutional Court – is fully empowered under the country’s constitution to rule on disputes relating to the status and powers of Brčko District. The High Representative’s mandate under the Dayton Peace Agreement and relevant resolutions of the UN Security Council remains unchanged, and the Supervisor retains all the authority prescribed under the Awards of the Tribunal and could decide to resume the exercise of his authorities in the District if conditions warrant. Moreover, the PIC Steering Board, the European Union Delegation and the OSCE all continue to work directly with the people of Brčko and their representatives.

https://www.ohr.int/dayton-peace-agreement/annex-5/


Arbitraža je riješila spor i uspostavila Distrikt Brčko.



https://www.ohr.int/brcko-supervision/

Čak i da se prihvati da je arbitraža riješila spor,s obzirom na prirodu tog rešenja to jeste s obzirom na uspostavu kondominjuma,spor se automatski pojavljuje u slučaju nestaka Bejha ili nestanka zajedničkih instutucija Efbija i RS pod čijim se suverenitetom Distrikt nalazi.
Aneks 5 obavezuje strane u svim spornim slučajevima na arbitražu " as set forth in the Agreed Basic Principles adopted at Geneva on September 8, 1995" a ne samo u slučaju Brčkog.
Jedan od tih principa je i odnos teritorijalne pripadnosit 51 % - 49 %.