Ne samo da neće zabraniti ulazak nego se novi šef CIA-e upravo vratio iz Saudijske Arabije gdje je odlikovao njihovog princa ne da mi se copy/paste kako se zove za borbu protiv terorizma.

I došlo vrijeme da svjedočimo i tome. Poslije desetljeća skidanja, mijenjanja i utjecanja na vlade po svijetu CIA i NSA sad probaju to raditi doma sa Trumpom.
Dilaju novinarima tajne informacije kao na pokretnoj traci. Nikad do sad to nisu radili nijednom predsjedniku i njegovoj administraciji. Od vremena kad je Hover prisluškivao Kennedys.

Ja sam vam govorio da su Pentagon, CIA, NSA (FBI puno manje) igračke i alat za discipliniranje naroda po svijetu i ubijanje Boga u njima da prihvate NWO. Sad im to po prvi put u riziku da izgube kontrolu nad tim.
Na njihovu žalost Kina i Rusija nisu kandidati za takve rabote, iz raznih razloga, lista predugačka. Ostale "sile" Indija, Brazil, Turska, Pakistan. Možeš s njima guzicu obrisati, ne NWO napraviti. Samo su Kinezi i Rusi alternativa. A ovi koji su protiv Trumpa te igračke ne mogu dobiti nikada. Ostaje im boriti se za Pentagon, CIA, NSA. Ne bi me čudilo da ubiju Trumpa. Ali izglednije da će mu pokušavati zatvor namjestiti.

Trump administration plans crackdown on recreational marijuana



President Donald Trump’s administration said on Thursday for the first time that it will crack down on marijuana sales in states that have approved recreational pot use.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said the Department of Justice will pursue enforcement of federal law against recreational use, but not medical use. The statement marked a major break with the Obama administration’s hands-off approach to the growing marijuana legalization movement.

“I do believe that you’ll see greater enforcement,” Spicer told reporters at his daily briefing. “Because again there’s a big difference between the medical use … that’s very different than the recreational use, which is something the Department of Justice will be further looking into.”

The decision is certain to provoke a fight with the states that have legalized recreational marijuana. Those states are Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon and Washington and the District of Columbia.

Jay Inslee, Washington state’s Democratic governor, made it clear earlier this month that the state would fight hard if the Trump team tried to block its recreational pot sales. “I think it would be a really big mistake for them to pick this fight, and I hope it will not occur,” Inslee said.

California legalization could translate to $5 billion in annual retail sales if Trump doesn’t intervene, according to estimates from Marijuana Business Daily. A cannabis caucus formed in Congress last week and vowed to fight Trump, if necessary, and protect legalization. Among the co-founders is Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican and Trump supporter whose name was floated for secretary of state before ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson got the job.

Nevada Senate Majority Leader Aaron D. Ford called on the state’s attorney general to “vigorously defend” the state’s laws.

“Not only did voters overwhelmingly vote to approve the legalization of recreational marijuana, the governor’s proposed education budget depends on tax revenue from recreational marijuana sales,” Ford said. “Any action by the Trump administration would be an insult to Nevada voters and would pick the pockets of Nevada’s students.”

Seventy-one percent of voters say the government should not enforce federal marijuana laws in states that have legalized medical or recreational marijuana use, according to a Quinnipiac University Poll released Thursday. Fifty nine percent support legalizing recreational marijuana while 93 percent of Americans support medical marijuana use.

Washington and Colorado were the first states to legalize marijuana in 2012, while California followed suit last year. Twenty-eight states have legalized the drug for medical use.

Spicer compared the use of recreational marijuana to the opioid addiction crisis that has ravaged many communities across the nation. “The last thing we should be doing is encouraging people,” he said. He referred specific questions on enforcement to the Justice Department.

But there’s little evidence to connect marijuana to opioid addiction. In 2014, John Hopkins School of Public Health published a report that found in states that had legalized medical marijuana “the annual number of deaths from prescription drug overdose is 25 percent lower than in states where medical marijuana remains illegal.”

“Science has discredited the idea that marijuana serves as any kind of gateway drug, and the addiction and death rates associated with opioids simply do not occur in any way with cannabis,” said Taylor West, deputy director of the National Cannabis Industry Association.

Backers of marijuana legalization had been been waiting to see how the Trump administration would respond to the growing conflict between state and federal marijuana laws.

Trump has voiced conflicting opinions about marijuana legalization through the years. At one point, during the presidential campaign, he said he supported allowing states to choose how to legislate medical marijuana. “In terms of marijuana and legalization, I think that should be a state issue, state-by-state,” Trump told reporters in 2015.

But Trump’s appointment of former Alabama Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions, a longtime marijuana foe who criticized President Barack Obama for not enforcing the ban on pots sales, rattled pot backers and had them braced for the worst. Obama, who smoked marijuana in his younger days in Hawaii, had left states to deal with the issue after famously telling ABC-TV’s Barbara Walters in 2012 that he had “bigger fish to fry.”

During his recent confirmation hearing, Sessions did not reveal whether he would enforce the laws. “Using good judgment about how to handle these cases will be a responsibility of mine,” he said. “I know it won’t be an easy decision, but I will try to do my duty in a fair and just way.”

Marijuana advocates said Trump risks a public backlash if he cracks down on weed.

“If the administration is looking for ways to become less popular, cracking down on voter-approved marijuana laws would be a great way to do it,” said Tom Angell, chairman of the pro-legalization group Marijuana Majority.

“The vast majority of Americans agree that the federal government has no business interfering in state marijuana laws,” said Mason Tvert, director of communications for the Marijuana Policy Project. “This administration is claiming that it values states’ rights, so we hope they will respect the rights of states to determine their own marijuana policies.”

But Kevin Sabet, president of the anti-legalization group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, called the current situation “unsustainable.”

“States that have legalized marijuana continue to see a black market for the drug, increased rates of youth drug use, continued high rates of alcohol sales, and interstate trafficking, with drug dealers taking advantage of non-enforcement,” he said. “This isn’t an issue about states rights – it’s an issue of public health and safety for communities.”

Still, some industry officials said it was hard to take the White House announcement seriously, given the growing popularity of marijuana and widespread pubic acceptance for legalization.

“I don’t think it’s realistic for Trump to wage an all-out war against recreational marijuana. … My guess is that this is saber rattling,” said Aaron Herzberg, partner and general counsel of Calcann Holdings LLC, a California medical marijuana real estate company.

Spicer said the administration would not go after medical marijuana use.

“The president understands the pain and suffering that many people go through who are facing, especially terminal diseases, and the comfort that some of these drugs, including medical marijuana, can bring to them,” Spicer said.

Trump administration puts recreational marijuana in crosshairs

States where recreational marijuana is legal will be subject to “greater enforcement” under the Trump administration, White House spokesman Sean Spicer said Thursday.

But watchers of Colorado’s billion-dollar weed industry are waiting to see whether Spicer’s statements during his daily briefing actually yield a real shift in enforcement policy.

“There’s a big difference between (medical marijuana) and recreational marijuana, and I think when you see something like the opioid addiction crisis blossoming in so many states around this country, the last thing we should be doing is encouraging people,” Spicer said, giving the first glimpse of the new administration’s views of the growing legal cannabis industry. “There is still a federal law that we need to abide by in terms of recreational marijuana and other drugs of that nature.”

Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, although voters in Colorado and seven other states and Washington, D.C., approved measures to legalize recreational pot sales and consumption. Medical marijuana is legal in 28 states, Puerto Rico, Guam and the District of Columbia.

When asked about increased enforcement around recreational pot, Spicer said: “That’s a question for the Department of Justice. I do believe that you’ll see greater enforcement of it.”

Mark Bolton, marijuana advisor to Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, said it would be premature to speculate about the administration’s intentions.

“We have worked with the Department of Justice since legalization to develop a framework that respects voters and promotes public safety,” he said in an e-mail.

Brookings Institution drug policy expert John Hudak said the White House statement “is not a death knell for recreational marijuana, nor is it clarification.”

Hudak said a troubling aspect of the briefing was Spicer’s “clear lack of understanding of federal law.”

Spicer claims there’s a difference between medical marijuana and recreational marijuana, Hudak said.

“I think it’s true in practice, it’s true in public opinion, but it’s not true in federal law,” Hudak said. “Medical marijuana is just as illegal as recreational marijuana.”

And yet, the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment keeps the Department of Justice from spending money to enforce the Controlled Substances Act in medical marijuana states, he said.

“I think what is said from the podium and what happens in policy often have a disconnect,” Hudak said.

Pushing back in Congress
Uncertainty has lingered for months around how the Trump administration might handle the topic of marijuana legalization.

“The president has said time and again that the decision about marijuana needs to be left to the states,” U.S. Rep. Jared Polis, a Boulder Democrat, said in a statement about Spicer’s comments. “Now either the president is flip-flopping or his staff is, once again, speaking out of turn. Either way, these comments leave doubt and uncertainty for the marijuana industry, stifling job growth in my state.”

Polis is a member of the congressional Cannabis Caucus, along with Earl Blumenauer, D-Oregon, whose state started recreational sales in the fall of 2015.

“The national prohibition of cannabis has been a failure, and millions of voters across the country have demanded a more sensible approach. I’m looking forward to working with the leadership of our newly formed cannabis caucus to ensure that these wishes are protected,” Blumenauer said in a statement.

Colorado, which in 2014 became the first state to initiate recreational marijuana sales, recorded $1.3 billion in medical and recreational cannabis sales in 2016. Sales nationwide are projected to reach $24.5 billion by 2025, according to a report issued earlier this week by industry analytics firm New Frontier Data.

Adhering to Cole Memo for now
After winning the election, President Donald Trump nominated Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions a vocal opponent of legalization, as the nation’s attorney general. This raised questions about the direction the Department of Justice would take regarding the 2013 Cole Memo, which established guidance for when federal prosecutors should enforce U.S. marijuana laws..

All U.S. attorneys, including Bob Troyer, the acting U.S. attorney for Colorado and Wyoming, operate under the Cole Memo. While Spicer’s comments Thursday indicated new guidance may be coming, nothing new has been handed down.

“We will follow that guidance until, if or when, we receive new or amended guidance,” said Jeff Dorschner, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Colorado.

Trump has wavered on the marijuana legalization issue, but said on the campaign trail that he favors states’ rights and would not interfere even with legal recreational-use states such as Colorado.

Andrew Freedman, a marijuana regulations consultant who previously served as Colorado’s director of marijuana coordination, said that it would be a very complicated exercise — especially legally — to unravel the regulations put in place by states such as Colorado, Washington and Oregon. The federal government also would be going against the will of voters who told their states to develop regulations, he said.

“States are set up to be laboratories of democracy,” he said.

States argue that by regulating the sale of pot they can help ensure public health and safety.

Freedman worries that if the feds try to undo the regulated pot industry, “in that vacuum it would be the black market that comes in to fulfill the supply.”

Dan Anglin, the chairman of the Colorado Cannabis Chamber of Commerce, said he was surprised by Spicer’s statements. A crackdown would harm the president’s popularity considering that legalization has broad support across the nation, he said.

“The administration has its hands full with a lot of other things which they intended to change,” he said. “This didn’t seem like something that was at the top 100 of President Trump’s list.”

Anglin didn’t expect an immediate crackdown, but said he wouldn’t be surprised if cannabis businesses received legal notices to stop selling and growing. If that does happen, he said he hopes Attorney General Cynthia Coffman will step up to defend Colorado’s constitution.

In the meantime, Anglin said it will be business as usual at his Boulder edibles company, Americanna.

As a voting Republican, Anglin said he was disappointed by the federal government stepping in on what he called a states’ rights issue.

“If we were issued a federal order to cease and desist, we would,” Anglin said. “However, I would imagine that many of us — if not all of us — would join in a suit against the federal government for making such a decision.”

Nevada Senate Majority Leader Aaron D. Ford released a statement saying Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt “must make it immediately clear that he will vigorously defend Nevada’s recreational marijuana laws from federal overreach. Not only did voters overwhelmingly vote to approve the legalization of recreational marijuana, the Governor’s proposed education budget depends on tax revenue from recreational marijuana sales. Any action by the Trump administration would be an insult to Nevada voters and would pick the pockets of Nevada’s students.”

Tom Angell of drug law reform group Marijuana Majority said: “If the administration is looking for ways to become less popular, cracking down on voter-approved marijuana laws would be a great way to do it. On the campaign trail, President Trump clearly and repeatedly pledged that he would leave decisions on cannabis policy to the states. With a clear and growing majority of the country now supporting legalization, reneging on his promises would be a political disaster and huge distraction from the rest of the president’s agenda.”

Trump zabranio prisustvovanje konferencijama za medije BBC-u, CNN-u, NYT i drugim medijima

Bijela kuća zabranila je određenom broju medija prisustvovanje konferenciji za novinare, pišu američki mediji.
Administracija predsjednika Sjedinjenih Američkih Država Donalda Trumpa tako je zabranila ulazak na konferenciju novinarima The New York Timesa, Los Angeles Timesa, Politica, BuzzFeeda, BBC-a i Guardiana.

Riječ je o neformalnom druženju na kojem su novinari trebali razgovarati sa glasnogovornikom Bijele kuće Seanom Spicerom.

CNN navodi da je ulazak u Bijelu kuću bio dozvoljen novinarima zaposlenim u desničarskim medijima poput Breitbart Newsa, The Washington Timesa i One America News Network ističući kako je selektivan pristup administracije Donalda Trumpa neprihvatljiv.

Izvršni urednik New York Timesa Dean Baquet kazao je da se ovakvo nešto nikada nije desilo u historiji Bijele kuće dodajući da su medijske slobode i transparentnost vlade ključne stvari za nacionalni interes.

The Guardian piše da je ovakav potez američke administracije posebno zabrinjavajući ukoliko se uzme u obzir da je samo nekoliko sati prije Donald Trump izjavio kako je većina medija "neprijatelj američkom narodu".

Američki mediji osudili su zabranu poručujući vlastima da Donald Trump mora javnosti pojasniti svoje kontradiktorne izjave.

Tip je rocker, Mick Jagger.

Kako su ga mediji uzeli na zub, to odavno nije viđeno.

to trampe srbine

Kao što reče Steve Bannon, stari truli poredak se ne će predat bez borbe. Svaki dan je borba.

Gledam na mitinzima u Americi - ljudi se svađaju, dobacuju, zapjene prema predstavnicima zakona. Tipično medijski obrađeni. Mediji samo kanaliziraju frustracije i frustrirane osobe prema Trumpu i njegovoj administraciji.

Mene bi bilo sram pojaviti se na tim prosvjedima. Sve neki freaks i nakaze. Mentalno i fizički.
Kad pričaju vidiš da uopće nisu baš sa razumom bliski.

Nekad su onakve izlagali u putujućim cirkusima. Danas oni sami sebe izlažu pred kamerama.

Ja sam se imao priliku osobno uvjerit kako gradska "elita" u SAD-u živi u nekim svojim balonima, i dan danas ne shvaćaju kako je Trump postao predsjednik. Takve emotivne ispade od ljudi kojima je politika ranije bila od malo ili nikakvog interesa u životu, prema Trumpu je stvarno čudno i pomalo zastrašujuće gledat. Spomenut pred njima da ti je Trump drag i ispadneš nekakav čudan tip, budala u njihovim očima iako je druženje do tada teklo onako normalno... Oni malo odvažniji će reć "kako možeš, on ne valja, ovo ono", a ovi malo podmukliji će reć "pa eto, podržavam ja pluralizam i poštujem tvoj stav"... Poštuješ moj ***, ali eto... Katastrofa prosto.

Trampu puca brak. Žena popizdela. Dobro za spor oko zaljeva da se raskantaju prije arbitraže.

Nikad on Melaniju nije zarezivao ni 2%. Po svim vanjskim manifestacijama i odnosu prema njoj, ona je bila 17. rupa na svirali.

Covek samouveren i svestan da je velika razlika u godinama zbog love.
Njegov interes je lepa mlada žena i potomstvo njen lova prestiž i lagodan život.

Nije se utripovao na ljubav i vernost. Ako mu treba druga lako će je naći .

Moj stav 1/1. Poštovanje.

Tačno tako. Svaki dan je borba.

Inače, malo ljudi zna da Banon između ostalog, radi jako dobre i zanimljive dokumentarce. Ovo mu je jedan od najboljih

Pogledajte ovaj dokumentarac. Ima na torrent.
Nisam znao da su "demokrati" osnovali KKK i vodili ga. Niti da su bili glavni rasisti, pravili linčovanja, dok nisu skužili da moraju njihove glasove loviti ako misle moć zadržati.

Čovjek se uči dok je živ. I dužan je to znanje prenostiti na druge.

HILLARY'S AMERICA: THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
http://www.dineshdsouza.com/movies/hillarys-america/

Naravno, oduvek su najveći rasisti bili oni koji najviše seru o toleranciji, ljudskim pravima itd

Hillary Clinton Praises ‘Friend and Mentor’ Robert Byrd (a KKK Recruiter)

In 2010, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton fondly eulogized Sen. Robert Byrd, a former member and recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan. Clinton called Byrd “my friend and mentor” in a video message to commemorate his passing.



As a young man in West Virginia, Byrd was involved in the KKK and reportedly recruited 150 members to the group. While serving in Congress, Byrd set the record for longest filibuster on the floor of the U.S. Senate with a 14-hour filibuster of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

In a 2005 article titled “A Senator’s Shame,” the Washington Post’s Eric Pianin pilloried Byrd’s attempts to downplay his involvement in the organization as he grew older.

That letter stated, “I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side… Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”

Long after Byrd claimed to disavow the KKK, he caused controversy and had to apologize for using the phrase “white niggers” in an interview. “There are white niggers,” he said. “I’ve seen a lot of white niggers in my time, if you want to use that word. We just need to work together to make our country a better country, and I’d just as soon quit talking about it so much.”

Clinton’s embrace of Byrd during her time as a U.S. Senator — both literally and figuratively — has been a prominent meme among Donald Trump’s supporters at the Reddit community r/The_Donald. Members have creatively found ways to present a picture that shows Byrd’s Senate portrait photoshopped on an image of a man in Klan regalia — placed side by side with a 2004 AP photo of Byrd drawing in Clinton for a kiss.



In this July 26, 2004 file photo, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, is embraced by Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., at a bookstore in New York where they were launching his book “Losing America: Confronting a Reckless and Arrogant Presidency.”

Despite his many achievements, however, the venerated Byrd has never been able to fully erase the stain of his association with one of the most reviled hate groups in the nation’s history.

“It has emerged throughout my life to haunt and embarrass me and has taught me in a very graphic way what one major mistake can do to one’s life, career, and reputation,” Byrd wrote in a new memoir — “Robert C. Byrd: Child of the Appalachian Coalfields” — that will be published tomorrow by West Virginia University Press.

The 770-page book is the latest in a long series of attempts by the 87-year-old Democratic patriarch to try to explain an event early in his life that threatens to define him nearly as much as his achievements in the Senate. In it, Byrd says he viewed the Klan as a useful platform from which to launch his political career. He described it essentially as a fraternal group of elites — doctors, lawyers, clergy, judges and other “upstanding people” who at no time engaged in or preached violence against blacks, Jews or Catholics, who historically were targets of the Klan.

His latest account is consistent with others he has offered over the years that tend to minimize his direct involvement with the Klan and explain it as a youthful indiscretion. “My only explanation for the entire episode is that I was sorely afflicted with tunnel vision — a jejune and immature outlook — seeing only what I wanted to see because I thought the Klan could provide an outlet for my talents and ambitions,” Byrd wrote.

While Byrd provides the most detailed description of his early involvement with the Klan, conceding that he reflected “the fears and prejudices I had heard throughout my boyhood,” the account is not complete. He does not acknowledge the full length of time he spent as a Klan organizer and advocate. Nor does he make any mention of a particularly incendiary letter he wrote in 1945 complaining about efforts to integrate the military.

Neonacisti marširali Zagrebom, slavili Trumpa i urlali "Za dom spremni"

Danas su centrom Zagreba marširali ekstremni desničari u znak podrške novom američkom predsjedniku Donaldu Trumpu.
Bizarna kolona pod vodstvom Dražena Keleminca, predsjednika Autohtone hrvatske stranke prava (A-HSP-a), uz pratnju glazbe je marširala centrom glavnog grada, prenosi Index.hr.



Na glavnom zagrebačkom trgu povorka je postrojena, nakon čega je dio okupljenih položio bizarnu "prisegu domovini", u kojoj su se zakleli da će, između ostalog, iz zemlje "protjerati neprijatelje Hrvatske". Rekli su kako će se boriti da Hrvatska izađe iz Evropske unije i da kako će vratiti dostojanstvo hrvatskom narodu.

Pri kraju prisege, osim urlanja "Za dom spremni", krivo su pozdravili domovinu. Kad je Keleminec na megafonu zaviknuo "Pozdrav domovini", trebali su, po vojnom pozdravu, uzvratiti: "Pozdrav".

Međutim, postrojeni Keleminčevi neonacisti, koji bi protjerivali neprijatelje Hrvatske, nažalost ne znaju ni osnove vojnog ponašanja, pa tako ni pozdraviti domovinu. Nakon uzvika "Pozdrav domovini", ponovili su: "Pozdrav domovini".

Nakon toga su još pozdravili i Trumpa, uzvikom: "Pozdrav Trumpu".

Za vrijeme polaganja "prisege", neonacisti, postrojeni u stavu pozor, nisu se ponašali baš uzorno. Nisu se znali usuglasiti i odgovarati na zapovijedi u ritmu, a Keleminec je ih je stalno morao podsjećati da budu glasniji.

Kao nedavno Šešelj i njegovi radikali, i ova povorka je došla izraziti svoju podršku američkom predsjedniku.

Odjeveni u crno, noseći ogromni štit sa šahovnicom s prvim bijelim poljem, mašući američkim zastavama i zaštićeni policijom, privlačili su poglede prolaznika.

Među zastavama kojima su mahali se istakla i zastava ekstremističkog, neonacističkog NPD-a, odnosno Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands.

NPD je ocijenjena kao najznačajnija nacionalsocijalistička stranka u Europi nakon 1945. Njemačka obavještajna agencija označila je NPD kao prijetnju ustavnom poretku zbog filozofije stranke te je NPD pod stalnim nadzorom.

I šta kaže kolinda

Ne trolaj temu. Dosadan si.

Kolimba se bre krstila i saopstila da su ovi skoro ko Vucic,Toma diploma i Seselj, devesprve.

Demokrati su bili nekada stranka desnice dok republikanci stranka ljevice. To je bilo do nekih 60ih godina kada su zamijenili uloge. Republikanci su bili ti koji su ukinuli ropstvo u Americi.

Nije nitko zamijenio uloge. Samo se novo odijelo obuklo. "Demkratama" i dalje odgovaraju siromašni crnci (sad i migranti) u siromašnim naseljima, kao kolonije za glasove na izborima.
Toliko su dugo na vlasti da su htjeli bar bi riješili problem Chicago-a.

Pa nije baš tako... Demokrati su uvijek bili "ljeviji" od republikanaca kad je ekonomija u pitanju. Osim toga, jedno je bilo demokrat s juga, a drugo demokrat sa sjevera. I tu su postojale značajne podjele, evidentne i pred Građanski rat. Republikanci su počeli značajno zastupat interese južnjačkih bjelaca u vrijeme izbora i poraza Barrya Goldwatera. On je napravio republikansku stranku kakvu danas poznajemo, ili smo bar poznavali do Trumpovog dolaska.

Mislim da te crnkinja povijesničarka za US history, iz dokumentarca, demantira. Valjda ona zna bolje.