Greenpeace Founder: Global Warming Hoax Pushed by Corrupt Scientists ‘Hooked on Government Grants’

7 Mar 201943,466

Greenpeace co-founder and former president of Greenpeace Canada Patrick Moore described the cynical and corrupt machinations fueling the narrative of anthropocentric global warming and “climate change” in a Wednesday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with hosts Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak.
Moore explained how fear and guilt are leveraged by proponents of climate change:

Fear has been used all through history to gain control of people’s minds and wallets and all else, and the climate catastrophe is strictly a fear campaign — well, fear and guilt — you’re afraid you’re killing your children because you’re driving them in your SUV and emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and you feel guilty for doing that. There’s no stronger motivation than those two.

Poznati istraživač našeg planeta alarmirao: ´Bojim se da nam je civilizacija pred kolapsom...´

tra 19, 2019

Jedan od najpoznatijih istraživača i zaljubljenika u prirodu, čiji je glas neizostavan u brojnim dokumentarcima koji otkrivaju čuda prirode, 92-godišnji Sir David Attenborough, smrtno je zabrinut za budućnost našeg planeta. U dosad najdramatičnijoj izjavi on upozorava kako se svijet suočava s nepovratnom štetom u okolišu koja bi mogla dovesti do kolapsa civilizacije.

Apokaliptični manijaci koji su nedavno širili medijsku paniku da "globalno zatopljenje" pregrijava Greenland. Sad priznali da su se "zajebali" za čitavih 6 C stupnjeva.

MICHAEL MANN REFUSES TO PRODUCE DATA, LOSES CASE

Some years ago, Dr. Tim Ball wrote that climate scientist Michael Mann “belongs in the state pen, not Penn State.” At issue was Mann’s famous “hockey stick” graph that purported to show a sudden and unprecedented 20th century warming trend. The hockey stick featured prominently in the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report (2001), but has since been shown to be wrong. The question, in my view, is whether it was an innocent mistake or deliberate fraud on Mann’s part. (Mann, I believe, continues to assert the accuracy of his debunked graph.) Mann sued Ball for libel in 2011. Principia Scientific now reports that the court in British Columbia has dismissed Mann’s lawsuit with prejudice, and assessed costs against him.

What happened was that Dr. Ball asserted a truth defense. He argued that the hockey stick was a deliberate fraud, something that could be proved if one had access to the data and calculations, in particular the R2 regression analysis, underlying it. Mann refused to produce these documents. He was ordered to produce them by the court and given a deadline. He still refused to produce them, so the court dismissed his case.

The rules of discovery provide that a litigant must make available to opposing parties documents that reasonably bear on the issues in the case. Here, it is absurd for Mann to sue Ball for libel, and then refuse to produce the documents that would have helped to show whether Ball’s statement about him–he belongs in the state pen–was true or false. The logical inference is that the R2 regression analysis and other materials, if produced, would have supported Ball’s claim that the hockey stick was a deliberate fraud on Mann’s part.

Mann says that his lawyers are considering an appeal. He can appeal to his heart’s content, but there is not a court in North America that will allow a libel case to proceed where the plaintiff refuses to produce the documents that may show whether the statements made about him were true or false.

Mann responded to the dismissal of his lawsuit in typically mean-spirited and dishonest fashion: “The dismissal involved the alleged exercise of a discretion on [sic] the Court to dismiss a lawsuit for delay.” The dismissal was for failure to obey a court order, and the delay went on for eight years.

In Letter to UN, Scientists Say There Is No Climate Emergency

BY IVAN PENTCHOUKOV
September 24, 2019 Updated: September 24, 2019

A group of scientists and professionals in climate and related fields sent a letter to the United Nations on Sept. 23 declaring that “there is no climate emergency.”

“The general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is at present founded are unfit for their purpose,” the letter, sent to Secretary-General António Guterres, states. “Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions of dollars on the basis of results from such immature models.”

The letter is signed by a number of prominent scientists and professionals from related fields, including atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen and applied geology professor Alberto Prestininzi. The effort is led by professor Guus Berkhout, a Dutch engineer who served as professor of acoustics, geophysics, and innovation management at Delft University of Technology.

Berkhout intends to release the full list of 500 signatories in Oslo on Oct. 18.

The letter states that current climate policies undermine the economic system and put lives at risk by denying countries affordable energy.

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics, and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” the letter states.

The letter’s release coincided with the U.N. climate summit in New York. Exemplifying some of the alarmism that prompted the letter, teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg told the summit that the planet is in the beginning stage of a “mass extinction.”

At a press briefing accompanying the letter, the scientists point out that the warming projected by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) show temperature increases four times higher than the warming that was actually observed.

The IPCC has previously said its climate models can’t be used to accurately predict long-term changes in the climate.

“In sum, a strategy must recognize what is possible. In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible,” the IPCC’s 2018 report states.

The letter to the U.N. states that the earth’s climate has always varied. The recent increase in global average temperature is no surprise, it says in the letter, considering that the Little Ice Age ended in 1850. The letter also says that global warming hasn’t led to more natural disasters.

The Berkhout-led letter follows a petition by more than 90 Italian scientists, publicized in June, which challenges the assertion that humans cause global warming as a theory based on models that have failed to adequately predict climate changes.

“It is scientifically unrealistic to attribute to humans the responsibility for the warming observed from the past century to today,” the Italian petition states.

“The advanced alarmist forecasts, therefore, are not credible, since they are based on models whose results contradict the experimental data. All the evidence suggests that these models overestimate the [human] contribution and underestimate the natural climatic variability, especially that induced by the sun, the moon, and ocean oscillations.”

How Dare You, Greta

By Adam Piggott -September 30, 20196

Let’s get one thing absolutely clear; Greta Thunberg is a woman for our times. I don’t consider her to be a child as 16 is about the emotional maturity that most women reach and never progress from over the course of their lives. She is a woman for our times because her scolding, condescending and unintelligent emotional blather perfectly encapsulates the feminist matriarchy in which we currently suffer.

Up to today I had managed to ignore this idiot woman, but the guys over at Men of the West posted a synopsis of the climate shenanigans going on at the UN and I decided to watch the video of her addressing the esteemed UN body.

Look, I starred in a few school plays and I can tell you right now that this sort of miserable acting performance would have had our year 10 drama teacher going ballistic at this misbegotten excuse for thespian talent. All they need to do to wrap things up is to make a movie about her life and get the talentless Brie Larson to perform the starring role, as the acting performances will be on par with one another.

“You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words.”

Says the teenage woman from the most privileged generation in history from one of the most privileged nations on the planet. Just how has her childhood been stolen? What privations has she had to live through? What lack or want has she suffered? Which climatic disasters has she specifically had to survive? I mean, sure, she’s had to survive her communist parents, but that’s not so unusual these days; a bunch of us had to do it. Yes, the left has a long history of using teenage blondes to push their radical agendas. But at least the teenage blondes in the past were relatively good looking and bonkable. This Asperger’s-riddled harridan is really quite a poor excuse for a pin-up climate chick.

Why can’t the left at least have some fun with it? Why not pin-ups for climate change or hawt chicks for climate change? No, it has to be teenage Swedish scolds whose hobbies including knitting, vomiting and flying to the moon, who we have to suffer through. The most repeated part of her speech was the following line:

“How dare you.”

She said it a lot. Many times. I know because I took a shot of rhum every time she said it and I can tell you that I got rather blitzed. How dare we? How dare you and your communist handlers, you stupid Swedish bint. How dare you catch a million dollar yacht provided for you by the Monaco Royal family for your little Atlantic jaunt and then look down on us peasants for wanting to heat our homes. How dare you think that we are so stupid to fall for your fake and patronising alarmist attitude. How dare you be so blindingly unattractive that I’ve lost my appetite completely after watching your prune face contort itself into hilarious parodies of what is supposed to be an “angry young woman concerned about the environment”.

“We’ll be watching you” she finished off with. Yes, sweetheart, we know that you and your cohorts are watching. You’re socialist pigs and that’s all you’re good at. And anyway, if you’re so concerned about the fucking climate why don’t you go out and do something about it? I mean, you’re buddies with royal families for fuck’s sake. Surely they’ve got the resources to do something about climate change. Go out and change the weather if you think that you’re up to it. Let us know how you go.

“Ooh, Bethal, it’s a really cold day today. I guess that Greta really got some changes made on the climate. What a dear she is. Don’t mind me, I’m just freezing to death over here.”

The only thing that this woman should be watching is the loony bus as it departs after dropping her off at the local loony bin asylum. A lot of commentators have expressed the opinion that they feel sorry for her. Well, I don’t feel sorry for her; I hate the bitch. She’s our undisputed enemy. She wants to take us back to the stone age, and you know what, I kinda take exception to that. I like being able to drive my car, and heat my home, and store my food in a fridge. It’s a big deal to me. And if some teenage trollop is going to go around saying that we have to change that and that she’ll be watching, well, maybe I’ll be watching too. Will she and her cohorts expect us all to eat cake when we’re starving to death? Hmm?