Zastitne futrole??? Molim da objasnis na koji nacin funkcioniraju?

link koji si postavio, sadrzi propagandni materijal putem kojega se navode posjetitelji da potraze zastitu u online shopu iste te web lokacije.

Da,slazem se pogotovo kod mladih ljudi, a ja da ne lazem pripadam toj generaciji instagrama,fb i ostalih drustvenih mreza. Ovo sto mediji i drustvene mreze namecu ljudima je daleko stetnije od ove corone recimo.

Sajt se finansira promocijom određenih proizvoda, očekuješ da govore istinu a novac za održavanje i hosting vade iz dupeta?

Šta je onda DVD o Hristovom životu, propaganda?

Sa vama ne vredi ni komunicirati, debili.

Uvijek ista priča. Sjetimo se samo spike sa konca 1990-ih kako mobiteli zrače, ako ih nosiš u džepu hlača da izazivaju neplodnost, kada pričaš da izazivaju glavobolju, da izazivaju karcinom itd itd.

Ja nemam pojma da li je 5g mreža štetna za zdravlje jer to mogu znati samo eksperti nakon određenogh proučavanja. Ali znam da, bilo štetno ili ne, da bi uvijek bilo takvih natpisa i hajke protiv.

Does 5G pose health risks?

(...)The electromagnetic radiation used by all mobile phone technologies has led some people to worry about increased health risks, including developing certain types of cancer. In 2014 the World Health Organization (WHO) said that "no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use".

However, the WHO together with the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified all radio frequency radiation (of which mobile signals are a part) as "possibly carcinogenic". It has been put in this category because "there is evidence that falls short of being conclusive that exposure may cause cancer in humans".

Eating pickled vegetables and using talcum powder are classed in the same category. Alcoholic drinks and processed meat are in a higher category because the evidence is stronger.

A toxicology report released in 2018 by the US Department of Health, and pointed to by those expressing safety concerns, found that male rats exposed to high doses of radio frequency radiation developed a type of cancerous tumour in the heart.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-48616174

The fifth generation, 5G, of radiofrequency (RF) radiation is about to be implemented globally without investigating the risks to human health and the environment. This has created debate among concerned individuals in numerous countries. In an appeal to the European Union (EU) in September 2017, currently endorsed by >390 scientists and medical doctors, a moratorium on 5G deployment was requested until proper scientific evaluation of potential negative consequences has been conducted. This request has not been acknowledged by the EU. The evaluation of RF radiation health risks from 5G technology is ignored in a report by a government expert group in Switzerland and a recent publication from The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Conflicts of interest and ties to the industry seem to have contributed to the biased reports. The lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology places populations at risk. Furthermore, there seems to be a cartel of individuals monopolizing evaluation committees, thus reinforcing the no-risk paradigm. We believe that this activity should qualify as scientific misconduct.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405337/ - US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health

Real 5G issues overshadowed by Covid-19 conspiracy theories

(...) The Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Organization, an Australian entity, examined 2,266 studies and found “significant biological effects or health effects” in 68% of them. Another, the Bioinitiative Group, referred to up to 1,800 studies when it concluded that many of these effects are likely to cause health damage if people are exposed to radiation for a long time. This is because radiation interferes with the body’s normal processes, preventing them from repairing damaged DNA and creating an imbalance in the immune system, these scientists say.

(...)The Swiss example
Switzerland practises precaution. It has its own radiation limits that are much lower than those of most European countries. The Swiss environmental agency, BAFU, has warned of unknown public health risks related to “electrosmog” due to the large increase in electromagnetic fields created from mobile technology. A task force that examined the issue last year, was unable to agree on any common recommendation. The Swiss parliament has twice refused to relax the radiation exposure limits.

Two researchers at the Swiss institute IT’IS claimed in 2018 that radiation above 10 GHz can cause tissue damage by heating the skin to ‘tens of degrees.’

One of these researchers, Esra Neufeld, told Investigate Europe: “Some categorically deny that there are anything other than the thermal effects. […] Others say the non-thermal effects are extremely underestimated. The literature is still contradictory. The bad thing about 5G is that there are practically no biological experiments that show how this radiation actually affects the skin.”

“The use of millimetre waves – frequencies above 10 GHz – is not currently approved in Switzerland,” according to Ivo Minger, a BAFU spokesperson. He responded to a question from Investigate Europe about the IT’IS study in February 2020. Thus, IT’IS’ finding has had no impact on the Swiss governments plans for a 5G roll-out, he noted.

But since 5G partly depends on these frequencies, this has delayed the 5G roll-out. As of February 2020, three out of 26 cantons and municipalities had imposed a moratorium on 5G technology. “In cities and conglomerations, only approximately 2% of the existing installations can be expanded with the capacities needed for 5G,” according to Minger.

In April, the Swiss government declared it would keep current safety standards for 5G ‘to protect the population from non-ionizing radiation,’ according to Reuters.

https://www.investigate-europe.eu/en/20 ... y/?ie_s=ga

We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe

(...) The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.

Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.

Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:

“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”

The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.

The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) increase the biologic and health impacts of the exposure. New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect, not a change in a laboratory rat’s behavior.

The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RFR as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" in 2011. Last year, a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found “clear evidence” that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes. The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats.

Based upon the research published since 2011, including human and animal studies and mechanistic data, the IARC has recently prioritized RFR to be reviewed again in the next five years. Since many EMF scientists believe we now have sufficient evidence to consider RFR as either a probable or known human carcinogen, the IARC will likely upgrade the carcinogenic potential of RFR in the near future.

(...) 5G will not replace 4G; it will accompany 4G for the near future and possibly over the long term. If there are synergistic effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of RFR, our overall risk of harm from RFR may increase substantially. Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress.

As a society, should we invest hundreds of billions of dollars deploying 5G, a cellular technology that requires the installation of 800,000 or more new cell antenna sites in the U.S. close to where we live, work and play?

Instead, we should support the recommendations of the 250 scientists and medical doctors who signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate moratorium on the deployment of 5G and demand that our government fund the research needed to adopt biologically based exposure limits that protect our health and safety.

- Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, is director of the Center for Family and Community Health in the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley. He has been translating and disseminating the research on wireless radiation health effects since 2009 after he and his colleagues published a review paper that found long-term cell phone users were at greater risk of brain tumors. His Electromagnetic Radiation Safety website has had more than two million page views since 2013. He is an unpaid advisor to the International EMF Scientist Appeal and Physicians for Safe Technology.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/ob ... g-is-safe/

Hrvatska udruga za zaštitu od elektromagnetnog zračenja

:kava

http://www.huzez.hr/

Naravno istraživanja nema...

Human short-term exposure to cell phone radiation causes changes in blood cell morphology

Prilikom izlaganja deset dobrovoljaca elektromagnetskom zračenju iz mobilnih telefona, pod mikroskopom su zabilježene strahovito velike morfološke promjene eritrocita (promjene oblika). Nakon 45 minuta nošenja mobilnog uređaja u ruksaku u pripravnom modu (dok mobitel očekuje poziv), crvene krvne stanice su se kod 9 od 10 testiranih osoba u većoj ili manjoj mjeri slijepile uz pojavu tzv. „rouleauxa odnosno formacije koja podsjeća na „rolice“ kovanica.
Nakon 45 minuta aktivnog rada na mobilnom uređaju, dolazi do razbijanja ove formacije, ali eritrociti ostaju ljepljivi te se pojedinačno deformiraju u oblik nazubljenog čepa od boce. Takve oboljele crvene krvne stanice sa šiljcima nazivaju se ehinociti. Ehinociti se formiraju, između ostalog, i zbog oksidativnog stresa koji dovodi do promjena u membranskim lipidima i proteinima

Imaš na računalu sa Intel moderboard backdoor koji CIA/NSA mogu koristiti kad hoće. I to je nemoguće ugasiti, osim ako računalo ne baciš u smeće.
Dokazano. Za razliku od "ne smijemo vam reći radi nacionalne sigurnosti" koje trikove Huawei koristi sa 5G, laži.

Vidim da i AMD ima nešto slično. Može li se to isključit?

također laptop (sama riječ kaže krilo-torzo) se stavi na sebe kad se sjedne il legne i satima radi s njim.

Polako upoznajem korisnike 5g mreža, koji su ostavljali desetine komentara protiv te mreže. Kad pitam jesu li zadovoljni internetom i kućnom mrežom, kažu radi fantastično.