Tu ima maksimum maksimuma 20k ljudi. U gradu od 12 miliona.

Tu ima maksimum maksimuma 20k ljudi. U gradu od 12 miliona.

Trendovi Šešelju, trendovi.

Ovi se množe i doseljavaju, rusi odumiru i iseljavaju.

7000 nuklearki u rukama sljedbenika nekog budueg Erdogana....

Ih dok ti trendovi, ako se nastave, a to nije zadato, se pretoče u rezultat od kojeg ti strahuješ, to će biti problem za najranije tvog praunuka.

Raša Tudej kaže da se zna skupit preko 200.000

200,000+ Muslims celebrate Eid al-Adha in Moscow mosques (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

https://www.rt.com/news/436474-muslims- ... id-moscow/

A za napad na policajca pred ministarstvom, nemam pojma, ne radim za rusku državnu agenciju. Al mi je zanimljivo kao što bi bilo da netko iz Zavidovića napadne policiju pred ministarstvom u Zagrebu.

Kao to bi me trebalo utješit????

Makar stvari su puno gore i puno brže nego što se tebi čini.

Ako ih je napao bez oružja, a vest sugeriše da jeste, onda je ili nakgluplji terorista u istoriji sporta, ili je jednostavno neki psihički bolesnik.

A od ovih 200k koji su došli da proslave izgradnju najveće džamije u Evropi, verovatno nisu svi iz Moskve, a čak i da jesu, to je ekvivalent 20k muslimana u Beogradu, a toliko ih otprilike i ima ovde, pa ne osećam nikakvu islamizaciju. Prestanite da paničite kao neke babe jbt.

Pa tako što ćeš biti mrtav i zbog toga ti to neće predstavljati problem.

I kao što rekoh, trendovi mogu da se menjaju, ništa nije zadato sudbinom. Rusi su 90-ih gubili preko milion ljudi godišnje, posle 2000. prirodni priraštaj je u minimalnom minusu, a nekoliko godina je bio i u plusu. I to je trend.

Biće imperije globalni, sa musli pješadijom preplaviće do Atlantika. To je baš geniozni plan.

Slaće đihad armije gde treba ratovati.
Nisu ludi u IIww izgubili 30 milijuna svojih.

Bolje tuđih, niš ne košta.

Od tih 30 miliona (mada je cifra realno manja, ali da ne ulazim u to jer nije poenta), dve trećine žrtava su civili. Pošto su bile okupirane Belorusija, Ukrajina i samo vrlo mali deo zapadne Rusije (osim par meseci 1941. za vreme Barbarose i par meseci 1942/43 za vreme operacije Fall Blau (Staljingrad i Kavkaz), jasno se vidi ko je najviše najebao. Belorusija je npr izgubila više od trećine stanovnika za vreme rata.

Biće imperije globalni, sa musli pješadijom preplaviće do Atlantika. To je baš geniozni plan.

Slaće đihad armije gde treba ratovati.
Nisu ludi u IIww izgubili 30 milijuna svojih.

Bolje tuđih, niš ne košta.

Tu ima maksimum maksimuma 20k ljudi. U gradu od 12 miliona.

Rusija ne treba da brine, sve dok je Srba i Čečena, NATO bezbožnička alijansa nema šanse.

Gdje iseljavaju Srbi.

Gdje iseljavaju Srbi.

Bit će imperij, samo islamski, a pravoslavni slavenski narod može samo preseliti kod mrskih papista, jer neće biti života za njega u tom imperiju.

Otomani napadaju a "papisti" nude "zaštitu i spas", jedini uslov je da... Već viđena fora (koordinisana akcija) na ovim prostorima, stolećima unazad.

Samo što se sada sve otrglo kontroli, slučajno ili namerno, pa je na sceni urušavanje iznutra. Ako Rusija i dođe u neku situaciju po ovom scenariju sa foruma "papisti" se već davno pre toga neće ništa pitati u Evropi.

Otomani napadaju a "papisti" nude "zaštitu i spas", jedini uslov je da... Već viđena fora (koordinisana akcija) na ovim prostorima, stolećima unazad.

Samo što se sada sve otrglo kontroli, slučajno ili namerno, pa je na sceni urušavanje iznutra. Ako Rusija i dođe u neku situaciju po ovom scenariju sa foruma "papisti" se već davno pre toga neće ništa pitati u Evropi.

As bodies mount up in terrorist attacks, Europe must realise Islam itself is not the problem but how & why people get radicalised

The West needs to thoroughly re-examine its relationship with Islam and rethink its imperialist policies in the Middle East if we are ever to see an end to the atrocities witnessed in the last week in Austria and France.
...

This has created friction between those who advocate policies of multiculturalism and openness, and those who favour assimilation and anti-migrant policies. The answer, however, is not so simple; afflicted countries must avoid drawing themselves into a broader conflict ‘against Islam’ which exacerbates such identity politics, and stop promoting instability within the Middle East.

What we understand as ‘Islamic fundamentalism’ or ‘Jihadism’ is often generalized as a pathology of the Muslim religion itself, which has lent itself to plenty of debate that might be described as ‘Islamophobic’ in recent years. To its critics, the faith is presented in zero-sum orientalist discourse as inherently violent and backwards, compared to the enlightened and civilized values of the West.

There is the school of thought that Muslims ought to be made to accept ‘Western values’ and apparently it is the failure of Muslim populations to accept or ‘integrate’ with this superior way of living that is the real root of all terrorism, which is far too easily associated as a product of the faith’s teachings.

Except it is not that simple. Islamist terrorism is not so much a profession of extreme faith as it is a mantra of extremist identity politics. While of course it is using Islam as the faith to justify its goals, understandings and ends, it is nonetheless the application of Islam as a political ideology.

Whilst such acts of sporadic violence have been influenced by particular dogmatic schools of the faith, such as Wahhabism and Salafism, the point of analysis for Islamist terrorism and its associated groups begins with a study of politics, economics and sociology, rather than theology, and the assumption that every believing Muslim will spontaneously be prone to such activities is misleading. As with any other human being, who Muslims are and what they do is a manifestation of the material circumstances in which they exist.

What then, causes radicalisation and leads individuals to commit such acts? The faith itself is not the problem, rather the feelings of resentment, alienation and disillusionment that play upon one’s comprehension of identity and create receptivity to such ideologies.

Most involved in these attacks happen to be young men aged in their teens, 20s and 30s. One may note the general absence of women and older men in terrorist attacks; instead they are carried out by a demographic which may more vividly feel a sense of despair, hopelessness and believe they have no stake in society. They may not even be particularly strong believers of the faith in practice. Radicalisation is not a theological problem, it’s a social one.
...

One cannot ignore the legacy of repeated Western interventions in the Middle East which have created the very sense of anger, injustice and chaos that have allowed radical groups to take hold and spread their message abroad.

Interventions in Syria, Iraq, Libya and so on have not brought peace and progress to the region, but pain and suffering. This destruction has ‘inspired’ pockets of people accordingly.

Given this, what European countries have to understand is that they don’t have an ‘Islam problem’, they have a ‘radicalisation problem’, and the two are much more mutually exclusive than many realize.
...

Ideologies are legitimated and mobilized by social and political circumstances, rather than theological dogma. And while of course this also mandates arguments for assimilation as espoused in France, it misses the point. The answer lies more in changing the West’s relationship with Islam, ending imperialism in the Middle East and seeking to quell the vicious identity politics which perpetuates such horrible acts.

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/505371-europe- ... r-radical/