Evo i ruska , čisto poređenja radi ...



Ima i žena u spotu ..majke , sestre , djevojke..

Kako vidim na tom videu crnci su na strani Židova.

Dobro, ne filozofiraj bezveze.

Pa kad već imaju tolike razike u programima trebali bi da se odvoje iz svojih dosadašnjih stranaka .
Šta bi na kraju sa Arizonom , bilo je skoro ponovno brojanje

Zbog porasta broja oboljelih od salmoneloze u Sjedinjenim Državama, zdravstvene vlasti su poslale preporuku koja je neke nasmijala - zatražile su od Amerikanaca da prestanu ljubiti svoje kokoši i drugu perad.

"Ne ljubite i ne grlite perad i nemojte jesti ni piti u njihovoj blizini", ozbiljno je zamolio Centar za kontrolu i prevenciju bolesti (CDC), glavna savezna državna agencija za javno zdravstvo.


CDC drži da je porast broja slučajeva salmoneloze djelomično povezan s takvim ponašanjem: od sredine veljače registrirana su 163 slučaja, od kojih su 34 završila hospitalizacijom.

USA Today removes the word ‘male’ from op-ed about trans athletes… and apologizes for using ‘hurtful language’
27 May, 2021 08:24

USA Today has been accused of capitulating to the woke mob after it edited out the word ‘male’ from an op-ed arguing against allowing transgender people to compete in women’s sports, reportedly without the author’s consent.
The outlet published a piece last week penned by Chelsea Mitchell, one of four female high-school athletes who filed an unsuccessful lawsuit last year challenging Connecticut’s decision to allow biological males to compete in girls’ athletics.

Lawsuit that would have banned transgender athletes from competing in female high school sports is thrown out by judge in USLawsuit that would have banned transgender athletes from competing in female high school sports is thrown out by judge in US
The champion runner wrote that she was deprived of multiple titles and awards because she had been forced to compete against athletes with “an enormous physical advantage: a male body.”

In her op-ed, she retold the “devastating” feeling of losing to “male runners,” saying that such experiences made her feel as if her body “wasn’t good enough” to overcome the physiological advantages enjoyed by her transgender competitiors.
She noted that in Connecticut, two transgender athletes who began racing in girls’ track in 2017 were able to win 15 women’s state championship titles over a three-year period. These same titles were held by nine different girls in 2016.

But Connecticut officials are “determined to ignore” why the two runners enjoyed such success, Mitchell argued.
“[M]ales have massive physical advantages. Their bodies are simply bigger and stronger on average than female bodies. It’s obvious to every single girl on the track,” she wrote.

Mitchell closed the op-ed by vowing to continue to fight for “all female athletes,” stating that she and her co-plaintiffs are appealing the court ruling that struck down their complaint.

The piece appears to have caused grave offense to those who took issue with Mitchell’s use of the word ‘male’ to describe her competitions – so much so that several days after publication, USA Today replaced ‘male runner’ with ‘transgender runner’ throughout the op-ed. In fact, the column has been stripped of all mentions of the word ‘male.’

In an editor’s note, the outlet explained that the op-ed was updated to “reflect USA Today’s standards and style guidelines. We regret that hurtful language was used.”
In a series of tweets, Mitchell’s attorney, Christiana Holcomb, accused the media organization of “unilaterally” changing Mitchell’s words after acquiescing to “backlash from the woke mob.”

“USA Today violated its principles to appease the mob. This blatant censorship violates the trust we place in media to be honest brokers of public debate,” Holcomb wrote. The original op-ed has been published in full by the Alliance Defending Freedom, the conservative non-profit legal group that represents Mitchell.

Numerous comments on social media expressed disgust with the “Orwellian” edits. One observer joked that USA Today should have replaced “male” with a more inclusive term like “non-birthing person.”

The debate over transgender athletes competing in women’s sports has led to numerous court and legislative battles. Last month, Alabama adopted a new law that bars public schools from allowing transgender girls to participate in female sports. Similar bills were proposed but ultimately shot down in North and South Dakota.

As F-35 problems piled up, Lockheed Martin sent top exec on course to ‘deconstruct’ his ‘white male privilege’
26 May, 2021 23:18

With its trillion-dollar F-35 fighter jet plagued with faults and delays, Lockheed Martin sent an executive in charge of the project away to learn about his “white male privilege.” Welcome to the Woke Industrial Complex.
Glenn David Woods is vice president of production at Lockheed Martin for the Air Force’s $1.7 trillion F-35 fighter jet program. Last year he was one of 13 senior Lockheed employees sent to a three-day virtual bootcamp to learn how to “deconstruct” his “white male privilege,” according to documents obtained by Christopher Rufo, one of the best-known US campaigners against the teaching of Critical Race Theory.

Woods was joined by other executive-level employees at Lockheed, including Aaron Huckaby, director of global supply chain operations; retired Air Force lieutenant colonel David Starr, director of the Hercules C-130 military transport program; and retired Air Force lieutenant general Bruce Litchfield, vice president of sustainment operations.

The retreat was run by ‘White Men as Full Diversity Partners,’ an organization of white men dedicated to improving “the brand, image, [and] reputation of white men,” according to course documents. The group’s clients include mega-corporations like Intel and Coca-Cola, arms manufacturers like Lockheed, Boeing, and BAE Systems, and Colonial Pipeline, whose fuel lines ran dry due to a hack earlier this month.

The group also held training sessions last year for staff at Sandia National Laboratories, which designs US nuclear weapons.

According to Rufo’s documents, participants in the course were first asked to free-associate connotations that come to mind when they hear the term “white men.” The trainers started them off with a handy list, including: “old,” “racist,” “privileged,” “anti-women,” “angry,” “Aryan Nation,” “KKK,” “Founding fathers,” “guns,” “guilty,” and “can’t jump.”

The trainers, who ask their clients to “work hard to understand” their “white privilege,” “male privilege,” and “heterosexual privilege,” then got to work “deconstructing” that supposed privilege. The Lockheed employees were asked to repeat a series of statements belittling their own race, including: “My culture teaches me to minimize the perspectives and powers of people of other races” and “I can commit acts of terrorism, violence or crime and not have it attributed to my race.”

Similar apologetic mantras on gender and sexuality were then repeated, before participants were asked to read a series of “I am tired” statements from the point of view of women and minorities, like “I’m tired of reverse discrimination claims” and “I’m tired of...the concept that we should be ‘colorblind.’”

Though Lockheed evidently deemed it important that its top-level employees atone for their racial sins, all was not well at the time with the corporation’s primary mission: building fighter jets.

A Pentagon review at the beginning of 2020 found more than 800 software flaws with the F-35, and defects that rendered its gun unusable. Though “most” of these issues were said to have been fixed by last summer, a number of issues that could “injure or kill pilots or otherwise jeopardize the plane’s security” remained. At a current lifetime cost of around $1.7 trillion, it is the most expensive military project ever undertaken, and even with the jet entering service, it already requires costly modernization upgrades.

When the existence of the Critical Race Theory sessions at Sandia National Laboratories leaked last year, Rufo revealed scores of similar training sessions in schools, corporations and government agencies, including the FBI. His work directly led then-President Donald Trump to ban the teaching of Critical Race Theory in the federal government However, President Joe Biden rescinded Trump’s ban on his first day in office in January.

“Today, it’s back to business as usual,” Rufo wrote on Wednesday. “Consultants such as White Men As Full Diversity Partners peddle fashionable racial theories and attach themselves to bloated government contractors such as Lockheed Martin. Presidents change, but for now the woke-industrial complex has no term limit.”

O majku vam glupu i niškorisnu.