Američki visoki poslanik za Solomonsko Otočje izjavio da američka vojna "intervencija" nije isključena.
Pa vi navijajte za NATO, Amerikance i slične zle gadosti. Od kompletne planete Zemlje prave majmune već desetljećima.

Britanska ministrica obrane poziva da se napravi "globalni NATO" koji će se suprotstaviti Kini, i da se Taiwan naoruža maksimalno.
Ako vam nije jasno što se događa u Ukrajini žao mi vas. Nekim ljudima je nemoguće pomoći ako ne žele pomoći sami sebi.

Ocigledno je da sve ovo sluzi pravljenju monolitnog bloka za buduci rat s Kinom.

Smijao sam se Srbima kad su NATO znak dovodili u kontekst sa svastikom, u medjuvremenu mislim da u toj organizaciji ima i gorih od Hitlera.

Problem je u tome sto raja to nije u stanju vidjeti. Cak i ovde gdje je svima manje vise dopusteno da stavljaju materijal obadvije strane, i gdje se dosta forumasa slomi dokazivajuci ocigledno, naime zlocinacku narav tog saveza, opet dobar dio navija za Zelenskog. Tako da je gotovo nemoguce da narod na Zapadu tu bagru protjera motikama i vilama i bakljama, a samo to im moze stati u kraj prije nego sto majmuncine zapale planetu.

China has revealed the damage to Western red lines

April 28, 2022, 13:10
It is unacceptable for China to cross the red line and deploy its troops “right on the doorstep” of Australia - said both Washington and Canberra. It would seem that the legitimate security requirements are quite legitimate. However, they look like hypocrisy and cynicism against the background of the Western reaction to similar demands of Moscow - especially if you notice exactly where this “red line” is located.

Freedom fighter or terrorist? These words have long been a classic example of double standards in international politics - and especially the policies of the United States. If they themselves or a friendly country are fighting with insurgents in the occupied territory (Iraq, Afghanistan), then they are fighting with terrorists. And it doesn’t matter that a significant part of these terrorists took up arms only to avenge the United States for destroyed families and destroyed cities.

But if, for example, Russia is fighting (in Chechnya, Syria or Ukraine), then, from the point of view of Washington, it is opposed by “rebels” (the word rebel has a romantic fleur in English) or even “fighters for freedom” . And it doesn’t matter that these wrestlers cut their heads, rape children, take civilians hostage, or worship Adolf Hitler, they are still “for freedom”.

These others

Now, such rhetorical searches can be traced to the example of the Solomon Islands, a sovereign Pacific archipelago that has concluded a security agreement with China. The point of this agreement is that Chinese ships can enter ports on the islands, and Chinese security forces (at the request of local authorities) can support the rule of law. And, first of all, in protecting the Chinese diaspora there.

However, this completely legal and logical agreement caused a storm of discontent from the United States and its main regional ally, Australia. In Washington, Canberra (as well as in Tokyo, Wellington, London), they began to say that this agreement is only a prologue and an occasion to place China's full-fledged military base on the Solomon Islands.

The base to which China and, accordingly, the islands themselves allegedly do not have any rights, since this placement is perceived by the West as a direct threat. “There will be no Chinese naval base in our region,” - stated Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison.

Fear and distance

The question immediately arises - "how much to hang in grams."? That is what Australia means as its “threshold”? What specific distance is so sensitive for Australia - and therefore the West as a whole - that the deployment of troops at a given point is felt like danger? From the Solomon Islands to the Australian coast, almost 1,500 kilometers - that is, approximately like from Russian borders to Munich or Egypt.

Imagine for a second that Moscow is speaking and saying that there should be no military bases of foreign states in Germany. That the eastern part of the Mediterranean should be cleansed of the presence of forces hostile to Russia. How Western countries would react to this?

The question, in fact, is rhetorical - because their reaction to much more modest Russian requirements is known.

When Moscow politely asked the Americans and Europeans not to deploy troops on the Russian threshold (and in the understanding of the Russian Federation, the “threshold” is directly our border) - that is, in Georgia, Ukraine - and also to abandon military cooperation with Central Asian countries altogether, these requests were defiantly rejected. Allegedly, they violate the sovereignty of the countries of the post-Soviet space. Meanwhile, we are talking about the deployment of American troops not one and a half thousand, but 0 kilometers from the Russian border. Or, to be more precise, 450 kilometers from the Kremlin.

At the same time, the Russian side made it clear that the rejection of its request and the deployment of American troops near the borders of the Russian Federation (as noted President Putin, “military development” of Ukraine) will receive a worthy answer. “The topic of potential expansion of NATO’s military infrastructure in Ukraine has been repeatedly mentioned by President Putin, and President Putin said that it is beyond ...“ red lines ”,” - reminded Presidential Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov.

Different shades of red

We remind you that “crossing red lines” in international relations means unacceptable actions, the answers to which go beyond traditional diplomacy. Up until the hostilities. Actually, Russia took these actions: guided by the inalienable right to self-defense, it began a special operation in Ukraine in order to achieve the neutral status of the Ukrainian state. And immediately received condemnation, sanctions and a general-western howl.

And what about the Solomon Islands? Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison is also in direct text calls placement of the Chinese base on the islands with a red line. Of course, he does not note what will happen at its intersection, but the Americans do it for him.

“Of course, we respect the sovereignty of the Solomon Islands, but we also want them to understand: if steps are taken to establish a de facto permanent military presence, the possibility of a projection of force or military bases (China - approx. LOOK), we will be very seriously concerned and take natural retaliatory steps, ”- stated US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Critenbrink, who recently visited the Solomon Islands. The official refused to answer the question of whether he included military operations in these reciprocal steps - which, translated from diplomatic to Russian, means that America at least does not deny the option to occupy the islands in order to prevent the emergence of a Chinese naval base there.

There is no doubt that this occupation in the West will not cause any sanctions or even condemnation. No, it will be called the "liberation of the Solomon Islands from the dictatorial regime.". And, of course, "the liberation of residents from predatory Chinese companies that pump resources from the islands and destroy the local environment.". At the same time, Chinese predators, of course, will be replaced by American concerns full of freedom and humanity.

And if the union?

And, again, we are talking about a simple naval base of the PRC, the presence of which absolutely does not mean that the Solomon Islands entered the military-political orbit of China. For example, in the African state of Djibouti there were 5 naval bases in general (Chinese, Japanese, American, Italian and French). What will happen if China and the Solomon Islands conclude a real military-political alliance?

Perhaps the United States will say that this is a “country's sovereign business” or “doors to the Alliance should always be open,” as they responded to Russian demands to abandon NATO expansion? Expanding right up to the very real Russian threshold, against inclusion in the Alliance of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova (which has no border with the Russian Federation, but has a border with Transnistria, populated by Russian citizens and protected Russian peacekeepers)?

Extremely doubtful. Most likely, in the case of the alliance of the PRC with the Solomon Islands (or any other territory in the Pacific), the chances of “liberating local residents from the dictator and Chinese predators” will increase dramatically.

The situation around the Solomon Islands once again shows the complete inferiority of the American vision of the current world order, based not on law, but on the rules. The rules, the main of which is the principle "which is allowed by the United States, are not allowed to anyone else.".

This situation also demonstrates the fullness and even to some extent the global value of the Russian special operation in Ukraine. After all, Moscow breaks down these rules of the West and pushes the whole world aside, if not fair, then at least an equal world. Where the sovereignty of all countries is sacred, where all countries must take into account the interests of neighbors and where all great powers have the right to the sphere of responsibility.

The United States will strike Afghanistan if they see a threat to their security there, said the head of the American Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milli.

Josep Borrel did not faint from such a statement. Scholz did not call for the abandonment of American gas at the same moment. The IOC has not suspended athletes from the United States from the Olympic Games. Ursula von der Leyen did not rush to draw up a package of sanctions against the United States.

Da vidimo ko na forumu nema obraza i ljudsko dostojanstvo.

Biden sends US troops back to Somalia

The State Department urged not to disconnect Russia from the Internet so that the country receives information - US State Department representative Ned Price
“We called on intermediaries from all over the world not to disconnect Russia from the Internet, so that information continues to flow into the country, and the Internet remains free and open within Russia itself.”

Since when US state department owns the internet?

"And this country will lecture us on how to protect our children?" - the deputy head of the government of Kyrgyzstan harshly answered the representative of an international organization from the United States

Kyrgyz Deputy Prime Minister Edil Baisalov said he does not need lectures and recommendations on the topic of protecting children from a state where children are shot literally every week in schools.

“Recently, an American Erica came to the country, tried to teach something about my country and how bad and stupid we are here. Why don’t you take care of your democracy, I told her then,” he added.

Dodon announced secret arms transfers from the United States to Moldova

Former Moldovan President Igor Dodon said in an interview with Publiska that the United States secretly supplies weapons to the country.

“In Chisinau, several US Air Force aircraft landed with incomprehensible cargo on board. When we requested information through parliament, we were told that it was secret... I know through unofficial channels that weapons are being delivered to Moldova, ”TASS quotes it.

Earlier, British Foreign Secretary Liz Trass said NATO countries are discussing the possibility of Moldova was armed according to alliance standards.
As Moldovan President Maya Sandu noted, Moldova is considering only gratuitous receipt weapons as assistance for the re-equipment of their army.