Izvor: http://www.rts.rs/page/stories/sr/story/13/Ekonomija/1154388/U+Kini+je+spas%3F.html

Nekada su glavni konzumenti luksuzne robe bili Amerikanci, Nijemci i Japanci, a danas cak i Ferarri je poceo da se uzdaje u kinesko trziste.

Chinese Eugenics

China has been running the world's largest and most successful eugenics program for more than thirty years, driving China's ever-faster rise as the global superpower. I worry that this poses some existential threat to Western civilization. Yet the most likely result is that America and Europe linger around a few hundred more years as also-rans on the world-historical stage, nursing our anti-hereditarian political correctness to the bitter end.

When I learned about Chinese eugenics this summer, I was astonished that its population policies had received so little attention. China makes no secret of its eugenic ambitions, in either its cultural history or its government policies.

For generations, Chinese intellectuals have emphasized close ties between the state (guojia), the nation (minzu), the population (renkou), the Han race (zhongzu), and, more recently, the Chinese gene-pool (jiyinku). Traditional Chinese medicine focused on preventing birth defects, promoting maternal health and "fetal education" (taijiao) during pregnancy, and nourishing the father's semen (yangjing) and mother's blood (pingxue) to produce bright, healthy babies (see Frank Dikötter's book Imperfect Conceptions). Many scientists and reformers of Republican China (1912-1949) were ardent Darwinians and Galtonians. They worried about racial extinction (miezhong) and "the science of deformed fetuses" (jitaixue), and saw eugenics as a way to restore China's rightful place as the world's leading civilization after a century of humiliation by European colonialism. The Communist revolution kept these eugenic ideals from having much policy impact for a few decades though. Mao Zedong was too obsessed with promoting military and manufacturing power, and too terrified of peasant revolt, to interfere with traditional Chinese reproductive practices.

But then Deng Xiaoping took power after Mao's death. Deng had long understood that China would succeed only if the Communist Party shifted its attention from economic policy to population policy. He liberalized markets, but implemented the one-child policy —partly to curtail China's population explosion, but also to reduce dysgenic fertility among rural peasants. Throughout the 1980s, Chinese propaganda urges couples to have children "later, longer, fewer, better"—at a later age, with a longer interval between birth, resulting in fewer children of higher quality. With the 1995 Maternal and Infant Health Law (known as the Eugenic Law until Western opposition forced a name change), China forbade people carrying heritable mental or physical disorders from marrying, and promoted mass prenatal ultrasound testing for birth defects. Deng also encouraged assortative mating through promoting urbanization and higher education, so bright, hard-working young people could meet each other more easily, increasing the proportion of children who would be at the upper extremes of intelligence and conscientiousness.

One of Deng's legacies is China's current strategy of maximizing "Comprehensive National Power". This includes economic power (GDP, natural resources, energy, manufacturing, infrastructure, owning America's national debt), military power (cyberwarfare, anti-aircraft-carrier ballistic missiles, anti-satellite missiles), and 'soft power' (cultural prestige, the Beijing Olympics, tourism, Chinese films and contemporary art, Confucius Institutes, Shanghai's skyscrapers). But crucially, Comprehensive National Power also includes "biopower": creating the world's highest-quality human capital in terms of the Chinese population's genes, health, and education (see Governing China's Population by Susan Greenhalgh and Edwin Winkler).

Chinese biopower has ancient roots in the concept of "yousheng" ("good birth"—which has the same literal meaning as "eugenics"). For a thousand years, China has been ruled by a cognitive meritocracy selected through the highly competitive imperial exams. The brightest young men became the scholar-officials who ruled the masses, amassed wealth, attracted multiple wives, and had more children. The current "gaokao" exams for university admission, taken by more than 10 million young Chinese per year, are just the updated version of these imperial exams—the route to educational, occupation, financial, and marital success. With the relaxation of the one-child policy, wealthier couples can now pay a "social fostering fee" (shehui fuyangfei) to have an extra child, restoring China's traditional link between intelligence, education, wealth, and reproductive success.

Chinese eugenics will quickly become even more effective, given its massive investment in genomic research on human mental and physical traits. BGI-Shenzhen employs more than 4,000 researchers. It has far more "next-generation" DNA sequencers that anywhere else in the world, and is sequencing more than 50,000 genomes per year. It recently acquired the California firm Complete Genomics to become a major rival to Illumina.

The BGI Cognitive Genomics Project is currently doing whole-genome sequencing of 1,000 very-high-IQ people around the world, hunting for sets of sets of IQ-predicting alleles. I know because I recently contributed my DNA to the project, not fully understanding the implications. These IQ gene-sets will be found eventually—but will probably be used mostly in China, for China. Potentially, the results would allow all Chinese couples to maximize the intelligence of their offspring by selecting among their own fertilized eggs for the one or two that include the highest likelihood of the highest intelligence. Given the Mendelian genetic lottery, the kids produced by any one couple typically differ by 5 to 15 IQ points. So this method of "preimplantation embryo selection" might allow IQ within every Chinese family to increase by 5 to 15 IQ points per generation. After a couple of generations, it would be game over for Western global competitiveness.

There is unusually close cooperation in China between government, academia, medicine, education, media, parents, and consumerism in promoting a utopian Han ethno-state. Given what I understand of evolutionary behavior genetics, I expect—and hope—that they will succeed. The welfare and happiness of the world's most populous country depends upon it.

My real worry is the Western response. The most likely response, given Euro-American ideological biases, would be a bioethical panic that leads to criticism of Chinese population policy with the same self-righteous hypocrisy that we have shown in criticizing various Chinese socio-cultural policies. But the global stakes are too high for us to act that stupidly and short-sightedly. A more mature response would be based on mutual civilizational respect, asking—what can we learn from what the Chinese are doing, how can we help them, and how can they help us to keep up as they create their brave new world?

http://www.edge.org/response-detail/23838

Kinezi gaze.

Pusti ljude nek se zajebavaju. Sad planiram kupiti novi Notebook, neću da poskupe.

Kineska carstva su promovirala identitet sa obilježjima nacionalnog, kakav je u Europi nastao u 19.stoljeću, još tisućama godina prije. Vladar Kine imao je "nebeski mandat", Kina je bila po njima središte svijeta, a podanici cara na nekakvoj svetoj misiji služenja caru i narodu. Koje god religije kroz Kinu prošle, uvijek je na prvom mjestu bila država i narod, pa tako i sada komunistima. Kod njih u građanskom ratu takozvanih nacionalista i komunista, jedni i drugi su po našem shvaćanju bili teški nacionalisti sa elementima rasizma, još su komunisti bili žešći po tom nego nacionalisti. Slično je i bilo u Vijetnamu, npr. komunistička oda zastavi Vijetnama je otvoreno nacionalistička i rasistička, žuta zvijezda je simbol rase, a crvena boja krv prolivena za naciju, tako da je kod njih što se tiče nacije isti vrag sve od krajnje desnice do krajnje ljevice.

Jest. Svi Istočni Azijci su veliki šovinisti i rasisti i to trenutno na nepojmljiv način Zapadnjacima.

Problem zdravstveno nesigurnih i opasnih proizvoda iz Kine i rješavanje problema:

http://www.dw.de/njema%C4%8Dko-mlijeko- ... a-16544891

Bombarderi: Odgovor Kine i Rusije na novu doktrinu NATO-a

Samo nekoliko mjeseci nakon što je porinula i u operativnu uporabu uvela svoj prvi nosač zrakoplova, Kina je objavila da od Rusije kupuje čak 36 teških nadzvučnih bombardera Tupoljev Tu-22M3, vrhunskih zrakoplova ruske proizvodnje, gotovo stealthovskih karakteristika i velike udarne moći. S čak 24 tone bombi i raketa po jednome uzletu i s borbenim radijusom od 2400 kilometara pri brzini od 1,88 maha, ovi su bombarderi posebno opremljeni za gađanje ciljeva na moru strah i trepet mornaričkim snagama.

– To je odgovor Kine i posredno Rusije na novu strategiju NATO-a objavljenu prije samo nekoliko mjeseci kojom se težište djelovanja prebacuje s Europe na Daleki istok. Ujedno, to je dokaz da će, ako do velikog rata uskoro dođe, on izbiti upravo na području Tihog oceana, u području interesnih zona Kine i Japana, kaže admiral Davor Domazet Lošo, bivši načelnik Glavnog stožera OSRH.

http://www.vecernji.hr/vijesti/bombarde ... nak-501669



A 100% Bosnu, pa tko će nju gledat uz ovo.

Ti bombarderi su namijenjeni razbijanju borbenih grupa nosača, i imaju široku paletu protubrodskog naoružanja, no ovaj članak je pun pogrešaka...

Po vrlim novinarima ovo ima stealth karakteristike

Ma stavili su i ilistraciju F15 ili čega. Nije to ključno. Znamo da su nam novinari nikakvi.

Dotukla ih kriza
Hrvatska Kinezima više nije obećana zemlja, napuštaju je
Hrvatska Kinezima, čini se, više nije obećana zemlja. Neslužbeno se može čuti da ovdje živi oko tisuću državljana te dalekoistočne zemlje.

Hrvatska Kinezima, čini se, više nije obećana zemlja. Iako ih je u Hrvatskoj službeno 492, prema podacima Državnoga zavoda za statistiku iz posljednjeg popisa stanovništva, neslužbeno se može čuti da ovdje živi oko tisuću državljana te dalekoistočne zemlje, piše Poslovni dnevnik.

Na prvu se čini da ih je više, da su brojke premale, ali prema riječima sugovornika s kojima je list razgovarao, Kinezi u posljednje tri godine napuštaju Hrvatsku. Najčešće se vraćaju u Kinu ili pak odlaze u razvijenije zemlje Europske unije.

– Napuštaju Hrvatsku iz dana u dan. Neki se vraćaju u Kinu, neki odlaze dalje, u Češku, Poljsku, a neki i u Ameriku. Nema više ljudi, odlaze naši prijatelji, gotovo se više nemamo s kime i družiti – kaže Wenzi Chen, Kinez koji već gotovo 20 godina živi na zagrebačkoj adresi.

http://www.vecernji.hr/biznis/hrvatska- ... nak-502128

Još jedan dobar članak.

Još jedan mali korak do ideala etničke homogenosti nove svjetske supersile.

Ja se sa njima svakodnevno družio tu u Vinkovcima. Naučio sam da se pas kaže "chi" ,osim ako me nisu slagali...

@doc, to je F-35, stvarno nemaš pojma
Što se tiče Kineza, ja znam jednu iz miješanig braka i ona je u potpunosti asimilirana, hrvatski govori najnormalnije, stavi Thompsona na dan pada Vukovara, nije ni jako kosoka, samo što je patuljak

Nisam ponovno otvarao članak pa nisam točno zapamtio šta je bilo od prvog gledanja.

Supruga mi je živjela tamo jedno vrijeme. Sad zna jesti sa onim štapićima. Ja probao i popizdio.

Sjetim se kad sam jednom ovdje otišao u neki kineski restoran i glupani imali onaj nečitljivi jelovnik sa onim ukrasnim slovima, ne možeš uopće pročitati od čega je jelo. Pa popizdio i prstom bezveze "kliknuo" na nešto da sam sebe iznenadim. I baš sam se iznenadio, Kinez donosi ribu ja ga furam da to nisam naručio. Onda ode do glavnog konobara, vrati se i tresnu na stol onu ribu.

U Munchenu sam bio u Pekinškom restoranu prije 2 mj ,bila neka akcija platiš 20e i jedeš kolko hoćeš.
Hrana im je u banani ,blago rečeno ,sve neka povrća ,juhice,jedva našo meso... nije ni čudo što su tako mali.

Onda si trefio Kineza bauštelca koji zapadnjacima prodaje "umijeće kineske kuhnje". Kad odeš kod pravih kineskih kuhara to je uživanje. Mislim na to da za istu cijenu jedeš što hoćeš i koliko hoćeš. Najviše sam volio otići bez društva. Nakupujem novina i lagano uživam.

Da graciozni su za popizdit.

Pogotovo žene. To je valjda od komunizma.

Isto mislim da si potrefio Mario. Ja nekad u Zagrebu znam otić i zbilja je fino. Nije ni skupo.

Treba sad otić. Pola ih se navodno zatvorilo. Valjda su cijene bagatela.

Nekakvi čudni jesu, ali ne na štetu drugima i društvu. Kad bi čitava planeta bila kao oni bio bi to lijep svijet. Gledaju svoja posla, izbjegavaju konflikte i probleme, dosta mirni.

Dijelom se slažem ali nisam siguran da će takvi bit kad ojačaju. Kao i svaki. Već po Africi vidimo kakvi su Kinezi eksploatatori.

I baš bi volio znat kineski, mislim da nas žešće psuju u restoranu.

Nikad oni ne mogu biti vodeća sila u svijetu. Prije Rusi to mogu biti. Na univerzitetima im je normalno čučavci WC-i bez ikakvih ograda.
Daleko je to od ičega normalnog da bi se nametnuli svijetu i da bi ih svijet prihvatio kao vođu.

Rusa je ipak premalo. Da su dogurali do 200 milijuna ajde nekako. Onda bi imali i veći potencijal za iskoristiti i naselit azijski dio.

To je primamljivo za Kineze. Onakvo bogato prostranstvo sa 30-40 milijuna ljudi.

Ne održavaju zalud Rusi vojnu industriju. Jao njima ako gard spuste.

Has the Bell Begun to Toll for China?

“Why did the Soviet Union disintegrate? Why did the Soviet Communist Party collapse? An important reason was that their ideals and convictions wavered,” China’s new leader, Xi Jinping, told a closed meeting of party elite in Guangdong province.

“Finally all it took was one quiet word from Gorbachev to declare the dissolution of the Soviet Communist Party, and a great party was gone,” said Xi, according to notes obtained by The New York Times.

“Everyone is talking about reform, but in fact everyone has a fear of reform,” said Chinese historian Ma Jong. “The question is: Can society be kept under control while you go forward? That is the test.” That is indeed the test.

What is it that gives a party its legitimacy, its right to rule? What holds a nation together when its cradle faith, its founding ideology, has been abandoned by both elites and the people? That is China’s coming crisis.

With victory in the civil war with the Nationalists in 1949, Mao claimed to have liberated China from both Japanese imperialists and Western colonialists, and restored her dignity. “China has stood up!” he said.

His party’s claim to absolute power was rooted in what it had done, and also what it must do. Only a party with total power could lead a world revolution. Only an all-powerful party could abolish inequality in a way that made the French Revolution look like a rebellion at Berkeley.

Xi Jinping’s problem? The Cold War is over. China is herself in the capitalist camp, a member of the G-8, and inequality in the People’s Republic resembles that of America in the Gilded Age.

How does the Chinese Communist Party justify control of all of China’s institutions today — economic, political, military and cultural?

If Marxism is mocked behind closed doors by a new economic elite and tens of millions of Chinese young, what can cause the nation to continue to respect and obey a Communist Party and its leaders, besides the gun?

http://buchanan.org/blog/has-the-bell-b ... china-5494


Malo o onome što muči kinesku vladajuću "komunističku" elitu.

Ne dao im Bog, nek se ne zajebavaju. Trebaju nam jeftine stvari iz Kine.

How China's high-flying single women are rejected because male suitors are intimidated by their successes
Millions of high-flying women aged 26-34 remain unmarried

'Leftover women' are highly successful career women aged 26 to 34 who remain unmarried
Far from spurning suitors, these women badly want to be married, but find themselves constantly rejected by Chinese men who are uncomfortable with their careers and achievements

Hysteria is growing in China about the number of unmarried 'leftover women' - but the fault lies with the country's insecure male population, according to a new investigation.

Far from spurning suitors, highly successful career women aged 26 to 34 badly want to be married, but find themselves constantly rejected by Chinese men who are uncomfortable with their careers and achievements.

The findings come from Dr Sandy To, a sociologist based at the University of Hong Kong.

One woman, a 29-year-old fund accountant with a UK Master's degree, described how a potential suitor, introduced to her by her parents, backed off because 'he said he felt that he had to spend a lot of effort to control me, so he chose someone else who was easier to control.'

Another interviewee, a financial services manager, 33, said: 'I used to date a guy who was much older… He preferred me not working. His idea was that I should quit work after we got married.'

The results come just one week after the country's communist government upset its young female population by ordering its feminist All-China Women’s Federation to use the derogatory term 'leftover women' in order to urge them into marriage.

China's government and media are concerned over the phenomenon of the 'sheng nu' - literally 'leftover women' - who remain unmarried despite having a good education and high-flying jobs.

In 2007, the Chinese Ministry of Education attributed their failure to find a husband to their 'overly high expectations for marriage partners', in an official explanation of what sheng nu means.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z2NKnmsHv3

Još jedan potencijalan problem pogotovo po demografiju.

Malo je glupo što se u takvim člancima ističe muškarci se boje, zastrašeni su. Muškarci očito ne žele karijeristice za žene. To nije strah već odluka.

It isn't that much different in the West, truth be told. Me? I'm an innovator, but have virtually given up hope of finding a life partner. As have most of the women professionals I know (age 40s).

- SarahD , London, 01/3/2013 15:52

Jedan komentar sa gornjeg članka.

The Main Reason Women Don't Want to Have Sex

Women feel exhausted by and angry about responsibilities they’ve assumed (or are hoisted on them) and resent the fast-paced living that so many of us have become slaves to. The combination knocks their libido right out of them. Whether a woman encourages the chase before marriage or not, once the knot is tied and the kids come in, chaste becomes her new normal.

The modern woman who has earned her stripes in the workforce and mothering is especially at risk. While saying “I do” was originally intended as a lifelong commitment to her mate — sex included — many brides soon shift their focus from their sweetheart onto their achievements out in the world and inside the home on kids. Being the best at the office, best at mothering, and best friend while working on having the best figure, home, and fashions shifts women’s priorities from the pleasures of intimate partnership to the demands of work, kids, friendships, and then maybe, and only if all else is done, their lover.

http://magazine.foxnews.com/love/main-r ... t-have-sex

Odgovor sa Zapada zašto Kinezi tako reagiraju.

Vjerojatno bi neka druga tema bila prikladnija ali zanimljivo. Nedavno sam naletio na neku našu kolumnisticu koja je upotrijebila izraz potrošena generacija žena.

Da li vi to primjećujete oko sebe?