Kao prvo, nemas toga u islamu.

Kao drugo, ima primjera izljecenja od Downovog sindroma,
a za izrastanje nestalog uda iskreno nisam cuo.

Katoličanstvo, koja je danas samo jedna podverzija kršćanstva, je devijacija (novotarija/inovacija) od one jedne ispravne vjere u pokornost prema jedinom Bogu (=Islam), koja vuče korijena od pocetka nastanka čovječanstva to je Adama/Adema, neka je mir na njega i sve danas do Noaha/Nuha, Abrahma/Ibrahima, Mojsije/Musaa, Davida/Davuda, Salomona/Sulejmana, Isusa/Isaa i do zadnjeg Božijeg poslanika Muhammeda, neka je Božiji mir na njih sve.

Katholikós je grčka riječ i znaci sveobuhvatno i ta devijacija je se kroz vrijeme razvila.
Ta riječ nema nikakve osnove u Bibliji niti je Isus sebe zvao katolikom.

Ok znači po vama muslimanima Bog nije svemoguć odnosno ne može se rodit na zemlji u ljudskoj formi i bit istovremeno i Bog i čovjek.
Po nama kršćanima Bog je svemoguć i itekako može to.

Veoma zanimljiv video.

:sega
Čestitam postavio suru koja dokazuje da je kuran obični šund i proizvod obične neznalice. alah je sotona, a muhamed najočitiji lažni prorok u povijesti čovječanstva.

Tvoj alah tvrdi da je dio svetog trojstvo Marija. "Svemogući" bog je po muhamedu neznalice ili lažov.

Kako sam sebi dati šah mat.

Razumijem da su to mislili Arapi koji nisu imali doticaj s pravovjernim bizantskim kršćanstvom, nego su jedine spoznaje o kršćanstvu imali u kontaktu sa sirijskim gnostičkim hereticima pa te hereze unijeli u Kuran.
Ali da Bošnjak u 21. st. u BiH ne zna da Marija nije dio Svetog Trojstva govori da je religijski nepismen ili Vehabija iz neke vukojebine koja nema kontakt s civiliziranim svijetom.

Nije istina, ta heretička vjerovanja su se održala van granica Rimskog Carstva i kasnije Bizanta dosta duže.
Bilo je još luđi sekti, pogotovo u Siriji gdje je to cvjetalo.
I onaj dio da Isus nije raspet su pokupili od sirijskih heretika, to je krenulo od Simona Magusa koji je bio madžioničar pa je tvrdio da je to bio Isus i na taj način izvodio čudesa.
Upravo od njega potječu vjerovanja da Isus nije raspet nego je izveo čaroliju, zavarao Rimljane koji su raspeli potpuno drugu osobu.
I gle čuda to kasnije završi u Kuranu.

Collyridianism (or Kollyridianism) was an Early Christian movement in Arabia whose adherents worshipped the Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus, as a goddess, and possibly as a member of the Trinity.

According to Epiphanius, certain women in largely-pagan Arabia syncretised indigenous beliefs with the worship of Mary and offered little cakes or bread-rolls.[4] The cakes were called collyris (Greek: κολλυρίς) and are the source of the name Collyridians.[5] Epiphanius stated that Collyridianism originated in Thrace and Scythia although it may have first travelled to those regions from Syria or Asia Minor.

Collyridianism stood alone as a heresy that sought to deify the Blessed Virgin Mary. Little is known about the movement’s theology. Not even the names of the group’s leaders are mentioned by writers of the time. This sect’s excessive Marian devotion developed into the idolatry of Mary worship. This aberration grew out of the Church’s rightful veneration of Mary as ever-virgin, Mother of God, and powerful heavenly intercessor, but crossed the line of orthodoxy when certain Christians began to worship Mary as divine. Details about the Collyridians are scanty, but one of the few specifics we know of them is that at their liturgical service bread was offered as a sacrifice to Mary.

The heresy of the Collyridians was very simple: They worshiped Mary.

It is ironic that the most diligent opponent of the Collyridians was Epiphanius (315-403), the bishop of Salamis. He was widely renowned for his learning and holy asceticism and was a close friend of Jerome, but he was also a rude and querulous man who garnered many enemies, some of whom were fellow bishops.

Though Epiphanius’s efforts to quash the Collyridians were laudable and his theological and scriptural reasoning against their idolatry was sound, he himself was not free from error in the area of honoring God’s friends. The vehemence of his opposition to the Collyridians’ idolatry was rivaled by his fanatical opposition to icons.

Epiphanius wrote against the Collyridians in his most important apologetic work, Panarion (Medicine Box [374-377]), a tour-de-force refutation of over eighty heresies known to him. He refuted the two extreme and diametrically opposed Marian heresies of his day, Collyridianism (which overly exalted Mary) and Antidicomarianitism, an Arabian movement that debased Mary’s status and virtues, to the point of claiming “that holy Mary had intercourse with a man, that is to say, Joseph, after the birth of Christ”

The Collyridians were primarily women who developed a syncretistic combination of Catholicism and pag an goddess cult customs. After describing the “awful and b.asphemous ceremony,” in which they adorn a chair or a square throne and spread a linen cloth over it for their ritual, Epiphanius writes, “Certain women there in Arabia have introduced this absurd teaching from Thracia: how they offer up a sacrifice of bread rolls in the name of the ever-Virgin Mary, and all partake of this bread” (Panarion 78:13). He emphasizes the difference between Mary and God: “It is not right to honor the saints beyond their due” (ibid. 78:23); “Now the body of Mary was indeed holy, but it was not God; the Virgin was indeed a virgin and revered, but she was not given to us for worship, but she herself worshiped him who was born in the flesh from her. . . . Honor Mary, but let the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit be worshiped, but let no one worship Mary, . . . even though Mary is most beautiful and holy and venerable, yet she is not to be worshiped” (ibid. 79:1, 4).

The Quran contains many errors about what Christians believe and practice.

One of the most significant is that the Quran misrepresents the Christian doctrine of the Trinity.

Muhammad mistakenly thought that Christians worshiped three gods: the Father, the Mother (Mary), and the Son (Jesus), (Sura 5:73-75,116).

As Richard Bell pointed out:

[Muhammad] never understood the doctrine of the Trinity.

The Trinity "seen" in the Quran is not the Trinity of the Apostles Creed, or of the Nicene Creed. (Morey, The Islamic Invasion: Confronting the World’s Fastest Growing Religion [Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, Oregon 1992], pp. 152-153)