Doc, radije ti uči kineski, Zapad je jednostavno prepun ovakvih idiota. Samo moramo vidjeti hoće li većina to otrpjeti ili nas za 30 godina očekuju gadni sukobi

Svaka generacija ima svoj rat. Ovo je naš. Ako pobjedimo budućim generacijama će se činiti kako nije ni bilo ničeg značajnog. Sve je prije bilo bolje. Kao i nama sad.

A treba samo malo zaviriti u povijest pa da vidiš sav kaos u svakom vremenu.

Ovo je naše.

Sa štitom ili na štitu.

A di ćeš veći ulog. I motivaciju.

Sloboda. Pravda. Istina. Nacija. Obitelj. Pojedinac.

Sve vrijednosti koje čovječanstvo drži dragima su na našoj strani.

Odnosno mi smo na njihovoj strani.

Rijetko kad je koja generacija imala takav privilegij kao naša. Da bude potpuno na strani svjetla da se poslužim njihovom terminologijom.

"Borbi našoj kraja biti neće..."

Pa druže budućnost nam je jasna, prošlost kako se dogovorimo.

Do pobjede.

A Black Reader Laments His People

I am a black man who has avidly studied race realism for at least ten years. The topic daily occupies my mind from the moment I awake until night falls.

Every day for over a decade. No exaggeration.

For instance, in your post entitled “What Destroyed Detroit?,” a reader mentioned that “…blacks are not self-conscious at all about the notion of white intellectual superiority. They acknowledge it readily and it doesn’t bother them at all.”

Would that it were so with me! I deem it mightily harrowing and nightmarish that a particular race can be inherently so far behind others in civilizational, organizational, and intellectual matters, especially a race of which I am a member. With the black race, regarding important matters that form functioning societies, the issue cannot be reduced to terms such as “less functioning” and “less capable.” Rather, blacks as a group are largely incapable of the markers of normal civilization and healthy societies, as exemplified by the likes of Haiti, Detroit, East St. Louis, south-side Chicago, and much of the African sub-continent (unless one deems wretched villages and slums teeming with bastardy, absentee fathers, polyandry, crime at peerlessly high levels, disease, and ignorance as functioning). In other words, the black race does not seem to fall within a clear behavioral continuum with the rest of humanity, but inhabit its own unique area that has little overlap with those of other races. For instance, does any other place on Earth, during peacetimes, fall to such ruination and seeming hopelessness as black-occupied lands? One might proffer the Muslim world as an example. Indeed, Islam has corrupted Middle Eastern peoples to staggering obscenities, but their problems are mostly religious. The problems of blacks chiefly lie with themselves. Ask Paul Kersey.

I struggle with the juxtaposition of a just, loving God who holds all men by the same moral standards and the stark reality of a group that, when left to its own devices, appears so dispossessed of (or heavily disinclined towards) normal social conduct. Is not my race generally doomed to failure, immorality, and ignorance? Notice that black areas, especially in America, are replete with steepled and storefront Christian churches, yet to a large degree, exhibit similar dysfunctions as voodoo-believing or animistic West Indians and Africans. Such realizations even make me question the very purpose of my race (and therefore myself). I am haunted by and almost obsessed with these dark, uncomfortable queries. They predominate my daily thoughts.

I write these things not to impute any wrongdoing on God or to question the veracity of Christianity. I am a believer of Jesus Christ, regardless of the general inabilities of my race. As Job declared, “Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him.” Believing in God is the easier part. Believing that He would have allowed such a benighted race to be created (or to evolve) and expect it to overcome its entrenched incapacities and live as morally and competently as others (and divinely judge them accordingly) is the more difficult part. I see, God forbid, no bright light at the end of their tunnel. Given this race’s intellectual and behavioral deficiencies, how can I?

Why do you think most Westerners, even Christians, deny or ignore race realism? The acceptance of this reality is simply too hard to swallow and leads to endlessly more perplexing questions.

In summary, I cannot find peace in this area by pretending to make race un-important like today’s liberals, multiculturalists, and globalists. Nor can I—a student of Thomas Sowell, Steve Sailer, and Lawrence Auster—explain away my race’s glaring deficits by deflecting them upon the long exorcised specters of white racism, slavery, and colonialism (like most blacks). My knowledge of history is too deep for me to fall for the sloppy, blatant lies of scholastic Afrocentrism (e.g., that Negroes built ancient Egypt and Carthage and derived geometric equations). I most definitely cannot and shall not become angry with or accusatory towards God.

Therefore, no outlet exists at present that will defuse my deep angst and enable me to cope with the pitiable lot of my race.

I trust, from your writings, that you are a God-fearing, charitable, and highly intelligent lady. Can you please offer me some advice regarding how I, as a black American, can better deal with the aforesaid issues and have peace? Were you black, how would you feel about the situation and what would your coping mechanisms be?

http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/201 ... is-people/

Vidim neke niske objede na moj račun pa da me obrani jedan fini crni kršćanski gospodin sa svojim zapažanjima.

“Rise Of The New New Left”?—Or A New New (Immigration Patriot) Right?

Peter Beinart argued recently in The Daily Beast that we are witnessing the rise of the “New New Left”—a coming era of Leftist hegemony stemming from the generational experience of financial collapse and declining living standards.

What is most revealing about Beinart is the sadistic glee with which he chronicles the dispossession of the historic American nation. He lazily depends on troglodyte-Leftist tropes about evil capitalists using cultural issues to trick Americans into voting against their interests. But, he gloats, this is no longer possible, as

…right-wing populism generally requires rousing white, Christian, straight, native-born Americans against Americans who are not all those things. But among Millennials, there are fewer, white Christian non-immigrants to rouse.

This reflects a common view of immigration on the Left. Mass immigration is a useful weapon on two fronts—the war against the ideal of limited government; and the greater jihad against the historic American nation itself.

Sometimes it is hard to determine which comes first. Thus the Left has seized on the idea that the government shutdown is the fault of “racism” and that whites are uniquely responsible for endangering social programs. The conservative movement and its ideology is dismissed as an “inchoate mass of aging, angry white people.” The purpose of breaking white identity is to unite the entire country in a narrative of dependence and victimization as outlined in Joan Walsh's bluntly-titled polemic What's the Matter with White People?

However, the Left’s promotion of Open Borders is also unmistakably, and perhaps primarily, driven by hatred of white culture in every Western country, especially in its more conservative and Christian manifestations. As Peter Hitchens noted of his own support for mass immigration to England back in his Marxist days,

It wasn't because we liked immigrants, but because we didn't like Britain. We saw immigrants—from anywhere—as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties.

Thus Beinart celebrated the deconstruction of the “settled, conservative” societies of the West after a half century of Cultural Marxism. He crowed that less than half of Millennials consider religion to be “very important” to their lives, almost half of evangelicals support gay marriage, and studies show that Millennials are far more likely than other Americans to support interracial marriage within their families.

Or as Conor Friedersdorf might put it, younger Americans are unwilling to read, say, or (perhaps) think anything un-PC.

Either way, the Establishment now enthusiastically agrees with VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow's verdict that (back in 1997!) that “demography is destiny.”

But since they are celebrating white dispossession, as opposed to trying to prevent it, they can openly state it without risk of condemnation.


The problem with this narrative: it avoids the real way the “New New Left” operates.

Look at how the Left developed over the last century. The “Old Left” of tough union organizers and professional revolutionaries was strictly focused on economic issues, in many ways to the cultural right of conservatives today. In contrast, the “New Left” emphasized cultural concerns, waging an assault on the hapless Kennedy/Johnson liberals in charge of American institutions during the 1960s.

The “New New Left” is far from being composed of rebellious outcasts. Perlstein uses Chris Hayes's description of the “newly radicalized upper-middle class” to describe this “New New Left”—economically favored, politically connected, and rigorously indoctrinated in the diversity and multiculturalist ideology that Paul Gottfried has termed the “religion of the post-Christian West.

In the universities, in the media, and even in the Internet through twitter or Establishment cultural organs such as the Huffington Post or Gawker, Leftist political thought consists of a never-ending hunt for heretics, even down to hounding and destroying random apolitical white guys who are not sufficiently feminist. Restrictions on free speech, insistence on utterly unverifiable “white privilege,” and the implementation of ever more stringent credentialism show that the “radicalized upper-middle class” are not some rebels without a cause, but a ruling elite frustrated at the few obstacles they still encounter. The animating drive behind the “New New Left”: what Steve Sailer has called the “rage of the privileged classes.”

The dramatic rise in inequality and the perfidy of the “banksters” of Wall Street are of course valid concerns. But the Left will not actually do anything about them—if it means having to compromise and restrict mass non-traditional immigration.

The Occupy movement that Beinart identifies as the vanguard of this “New New left” was especially active in mobilizing on behalf of Open Borders. Even more significantly, the “Occupy” movement quickly devolved into Politically Correct grandstanding and racial scapegoating, ensuring that it remained an elite movement of Affirmative Action tokens and SWPL stereotypes.

Dispossessing the historic American nation was “privileged” (to use a leftist term) above actually achieving a middle class society. After all, on the National Question, corporate power and the “New New Left” are on the same side.

The result is that the “New New Left” is not a broad movement, but a rather insular social class that produces the apparatchiks for racial socialism of Obama's Minority Occupation Government. Beinart's proposed transformation describes something that already exists, not something that is coming. Beinart's “New New Left” is not a “new movement” but simply the indoctrinated products of the governing regime, and the bureaucrats and commissars who perpetuate it.



As Angelo Codevilla noted in The Ruling Class : this elite is

…formed by an educational system that exposed them to the same ideas and gave them remarkably uniform guidance, as well as tastes and habits. These amount to a social canon of judgments about good and evil, compete with secular sacred history, sins (against minorities and the environment) and saints.

With each day that passes, these apparatchiks make more progress in deconstructing the people that they rule. In media, art, and culture, the “New New Left” works to break down any uncontrolled communities or viewpoints, from fraternities to computer programmers to organized religion. In government, they use the power of the state to break white communities through “refugee resettlements” and Section 8 housing.

They are the aspiring rulers of the “managerial state” described by James Burnham and Sam Francis, who sustain their status by breaking down their society so as to leave nothing in between the multicultural regime and the atomized individuals of the post-American society.

And worst of all, before you even open their mouths, you know every opinion they have ever had or will ever have. When did Gawker or the Huffington Post write something that surprised you?

A true conservative movement could seize the opportunity to champion a populist, insurgent message that could combine legitimate grievances against Wall Street with a message of nationalist middle class solidarity. The deconstruction of the American nation was not and is not inevitable. Demographic transformation can be halted, and reversed—as “self-deportation” showed. The multiculturalist Establishment can be stripped of state funding. Far more than the government shutdown, opposition to amnesty is an eminently winnable issue.

But a fighting American Right would have to confront the powerful donors that own the Beltway Right and the simplistic economism message that defines it. And it would mean actually opposing enemies—instead of giving them tax cuts.

If an American conservative or patriotic movement can ever accept such a challenge, it would mean the birth of a “New New Right.”

And unlike Beinart's mythical movement, this would be something genuinely new, and something that could save the country.

http://www.vdare.com/articles/rise-of-t ... riot-right

Malo o toj novoj eliti i vrijednostima za koje vidimo da se polako razvijaju i kod nas.

Evo, o ovome sam ja pričao, znači lik uopće nije gay, no zbog LGBt propagande je on uvjeren kako je to fora i ako osjeti i najmanju seksualnu privlačnost on će "prijeći u njihovu ekipu". Da se to još uvijek tretira kao seksualni poremećaj to mu ne bi ni palo na pamet

Usporedba života
Hrvat u Lihtenštajnu: 'Čini mi se da ljudi ovdje izmišljaju probleme'
"Ponekad se čini da ljudi ovdje niti nemaju problema pa ga izmišljaju. Ono što su pravi egzistencijalni problemi, toga ovdje baš i nema", ispričao je Vlado Franjević koji već 10 godina živi u Lihtenštajnu

http://www.vecernji.hr/vijesti/hrvat-li ... nak-626458

Razlog zašto liberalne budalaštine danas prolaze.

Jer mogu.

Another of Buchanan’s long-time predictions came true in 2012. As Buchanan has long noted, the onslaught of Political Correctness means a shrinking sphere of public discourse. Rather than debate ideas, many on the Left now prefer to see their opponents silenced.

And so, after the release of Suicide of a Superpower, a variety of Leftist groups begin exerting pressure on MSNBC to fire Pat Buchanan. And to its shame, MSNBC succumbed to the campaign. In words that must appall all VDARE.com readers, MSNBC president Phil Griffin, told reporters that “I don’t think the ideas that [Buchanan] put forth [in Suicide of a Superpower] are appropriate for the national dialogue, much less on MSNBC.”

Apparently Buchanan’s chapters titled “The Death of Christian America” and “The End of White America” were too much for the paragons of tolerance to accept.

No one really took fault with the demographic analysis that buttressed Buchanan’s argument. It’s just that the only acceptable reaction to “The Death of Christian America” and “The End of White America” for such as Phil Griffin is rejoicing.

http://buchanan.org/blog/pat-buchanan-7 ... -told-5974

Primjer političke korektnosti i liberalne "tolerancije".

Ali ćemo mi i dalje gledati filmove o zadrtim, netolerantnim, bijeloheteroseksualnošovinističkorasističkim konzervativnim muškarcima iz pedesetih kako tlače slobodoumne liberale iz liberalne tvornice čokolade dok nu vraga kako danas dobrodušni tolerantni liberali uništavaju sve koji misle drugačije.

Kako je jedan dobar liberal rekao Satoshiju Kanazawi: Ne znam jel on može ostati raditi kod nas ako njegova istraživanja pokazuju te rezultate.

Dobrodošli u srednji vijek.

Razum, činjenice i znanost polako ali sigurno bivaju izgurani i marginalizirani kad prkose liberalnoj dogmi. Emocije, želje, strast i nesnošljivost dolaze na njihovo mjesto.

Ali naravno kako i biti snošljiv prema nesnošljivom kojem smo zgodno oduzeli sve čovječne atribute?

On je štakor, ne?

U Švedskoj film ne smije biti prikazan u prime-timeu ako u njemu ne postoje minimalno dva ženska lika, koja međusobno razgovaraju i to ne o muškarcima. Ljevičari i sloboda nikada nisu išli zajedno, sada tim ljudima koji sw vole nazivati liberalima nije problem miješati se u umjetničko stvaralaštvo

Ljevičari su uvijek bili totalitaristi.

Sloboda ne ide s njima. Da smo došli u takav nazadak da se takvo ograničavanje slobode dopušta...za ne povjerovati...

I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.

James Madison

The neo-Druidic church of the nation formerly known as England has elected to allow women bishops. One of the female “chaplains” involved told her compatriots that they should allow female bishops so as to cease being “weird.” So there you have it, the “Church” of “England” will have female bishops not for Biblical or advanced theological reasons, but because they want to be cool.

By the way, former archbishop of Canterbury Lord George Carey said that the Church of England could be extinct in a generation. Considering recent trends, I cannot find myself to share in Lord Carey’s lament.


Sve mi se više čini da je u pravu ona tvrdnja da je patrijarhat biološka nužnost.

Vidjet ćemo...

Kako je rekao neki kineski dužnosnik kad su ga pitali što misli o Francuskoj revoluciji: Prerano je za donositi zaključke.

Inače ti lizači liberalnih guzica, mada ih je višestruko više od katolika imaju manji nedjeljnji dolazak vjernika u crkvu od katolika. A od katolika jedino više muslimana dolazi na svoju vjersku službu redovito.
Simpatična je budućnost Engleske zar ne?

Nema takvih suludih politkorektnjaka kao što su Skandiji ...

Ako me nešto živcira, to je kad mi slika nestane...

Brown pride

Cain Velasquez Shows Love Of Heritage With His Ink



Fora a?

Ako napišeš smeđi ponos onda pokazuješ ljubav prema baštini. No ako samo zamjeniš malo boje u tom ponosu pa on malo izblijedi onda si zli rasist.

Ili tako mi kažu bijeli liberali.

Kognitivni poremećaj...da...

malo je reći da izgledaju mentalno zakinuti.

Samo nisam očekivao da će to biti tako brzo...

For the second time, feminists in San Juan, Argentina taunt and attack Catholics protecting the cathedral from vandalism. LifesiteNews has the story.

The [topless] women, many of them topless, spray-painted the men’s crotches and faces and swastikas on their chests and foreheads, using markers to paint their faces with Hitler-like moustaches. They also performed obscene sexual acts in front of them and pushed their breasts onto their faces, all the while shouting “get your rosaries out of our ovaries.”

After unsuccessfully trying to get into the building, the women burned a human-sized effigy of Pope Francis. “If the pope were a woman, abortion would be legal,” they shouted.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/horror-mob- ... efend.html


Mada bi ovo moglo pod kognitivni poremećaj katolika.

J ih takvi katolici. Ovo se prije na lomači palilo.

Meni izgledaju kao iz nekog horor filma.

Najžešći mi je komentar na početku tog docovog posta :

Wild Things
Hunting the Domestic Polar Bear

http://takimag.com/article/hunting_the_ ... z2n07RrxxH

Životinjizam jedne grupe ljude protiv svih ostalih ljudi izvan te grupe nekako neočekivano se počeo i pojavljivati u medijima.

Mladenačka igra za mladež rase koju nećemo imenovati u Americi; loviš nedužne pješake bljedolikije rase, opališ ih po glavi i ako padnu u nesvjest, pobjedio si u "igri"...

Sjajno.

Nešto, novo, inventivno, osvježavajuće.

Pravi primjer autentične kulture koja se konačno oslobodila okova kolonijalizma.

Elita po svom priznanju, do sada cenzurirala ovaj izvorni izražaj zaigrane mladeži da bi zaštitila glupi narod od takovih informacija. Ipak elita zna najbolje. Šta će tu glupi populus previše razmišljati...ništa opasnije od toga...

Fourth, even though Ripley is excited to see some Somalis in one Finnish school, none of these countries has many blacks. What giant pandas are to the cause of biodiversity preservation, blacks are to the reigning dogma of diversity: “charismatic megafauna.” Thus, not only do blacks tend to lower test scores and disrupt classrooms, they also tend to warp elite thinking and public policy.

For example, the Obama Administration has been persecuting local school districts that suspend higher percentages of black students. Now, you know and I know and even Barack Obama knows that the reason for this is because on average black students cause more trouble. But in America today you aren’t supposed to know that, so the federal government is pushing a policy on school districts: If they want to stay out of trouble with the feds, they should ignore black troublemakers.

http://takimag.com/article/pisa_piece_b ... z2n3u7oEKm

Da nastavimo u revijalnom tonu.

Ne znam jel tužno il smješno, al danas sam dobro raspoložen.

Zapadnjački fetiš, volim crno pa makar i opiturano.

Druga u lancu zapovijedanja američkom mornaricom. Admiralica s tri zvijezdice.







Ne znam jel ovi portreti nešto govore. I ne mislim da ono očito, poput tonaliteta boja...

Neka svatko prosudi za sebe...