Stvari nisu bile baš tako jednostavne.

U vrijeme Rimskog ugovora, Italija u NDH drži 150000 vojnika (naoružanih, opremljenih), a Ustaša (slabo naoružanih) ima ovisno o izvorima između 800 i 1200. No to nije sve. Vječno zahvalan Mussoliniju zbog njegove pasivnosti kada je anektirao Austriju, Hitler daje punu potporu - Talijanima. I što učiniti u tom trenutku? Odgoditi sukob sa Talijanima za bolji trenutak. Tako je i bilo, a priključenje Istre, te ostalih područja izgubljenih Rimskim ugovorom, vlada NDH proglasila je prije ZAVNOH-a. I takva krnja NDH, bila je za 70000 km2 veća od RH.
A da su radili masu gluposti i to fatalnih, također je činjenica. Osobno, manju štetu vidim u Rimskom ugovoru (sa namjerom da ga se odbaci prvom prilikom), nego u objavljivanju rata SAD-u, prihvaćanju rasnih zakona, spašavanju četnika (Lika) koji su se povlačili ka Italiji, likvidacija Lorkovića i Vokića, odbijanjem sporazuma sa Staljinom (kraj rata, nema se više što izgubiti), odvlačenjem naroda i vojske na Bleiburg (umjesto da su se oni pretvorili u gerilu), što su se držali Hitlera do zadnjeg trenutka...
Nisam stavio odlazak legije za Staljingrad (što je bilo loše), jer se radilo o Hitlerovoj ucjeni i pitanje je kako bi reagirao da su mu Hrvati rekli - NE.

eo ga opet reductio ad serborum

znaš, u Jugoslaviji se i disalo, kak bi bilo da prestaneš disati, da ne budeš kao u Jugoslaviji?

ako ćeš raditi sve suprotno Jugoslaviji, moraš prestati jesti, piti, pišati, srati, imati vojsku, policiju, zakone...jer svega je toga bilo u JUgoslaviji.

Nesvrstanost je Jugoslaviji omogućila suverenitet. Nama su NATO i EU odnjeli suverenitet.

Suverenitet države koja je živila na stranim kreditima pa kad je prestala bit korisna ostala je bez kredita, bankrotirala je i ugušila se u krvi. Jebena suverenost.

ne znan zašto ne odete u šumu i pokrenete revoluciju šta se patite.

Uostalom, banderizam je hijackan od strane woke globohomo snaga.
Je li u HOS-u ili u HV-u bilo transića i sotonista? Dok u VSU-u svakako ima raznih sklonih devijacijama, a u Azovu su sotonizam i poganstvo folklor.

Edit:
Zapad se borio protiv hrvatskog nacionalizma i hrvatskih lajtmotiva iz WW2, dok aktivno podupire ukrajinske nacionaliste.
Naravno, nakon ukrajinske pobjede, koja se nece dogoditi, oni bi slomili sve naciste i sve koji pruzaju otpor globohomou.

"Imati mržnju" znak je potpune nepismenosti u hrvatskom jeziku.

A glede mržnje, nje u praksi nema. Ono što normalni ljudi mrze je ruski genocidni imperijalizam i Putinova politika nijekanja ukrajinskoga identiteta i iredentizam kojim bi rušio svjetski poredak.

No o tom kretenu i njegovim sluđenicima sam napisao već dosta na engleskom, i tko želi, neka čita (iako ne vjerujem da ovdje baš ima pun ljudi kapaciteta da išta shvate):

I have read his last two big speeches & these are babbling of an incoherent mind, similar to Hitler’s will.

As I said before, after poring over his speech- this is an absurdist fantasy.

Putin’s “thoughts” are- if he is sincere – these:

Russia is neither “white” nor non-white. He doesn’t think in these categories. For instance, he’s constantly drumming against Western imperialism, which he thinks began with the Age of Exploration.

His chief devil is not very well defined, but it seems to be a combination of Western Christianity (Catholicism & Protestantism) & now, perhaps, Anglo-Saxonistan which is, in his fantasies, dominated by WASPs. It is not clear how he treats other Europeans, but his image of the West is confusing- it seems that “West” is a combination of Poles, French, Germans & Swedes, Russia’s historical invaders; on the other hand, he easily switches between centuries & mixes the 17th C with the 21st C.

Putin’s narrative is also contradictory. It is not clear whether historical invaders of Russia (Poles, French, Germans) are now the threatening & potentially Russia-conquering West, or just puppets of the global WASP power. Anyway, all Western Christians, from the Portuguese to the English, are racists. Putin’s version of the contemporary world is that “good guys” are colored races (China, India, Africa, blacks in the US,..). Russia, in his view, is not “white” (whatever this may mean).

As far as religious culture goes, Western Christianity is the enemy. It is only Eastern, Orthodox Christianity that he thinks of “defending”. Also, his reinterpretation of history is laughable: he states that historical “friends”, buddies in Russia are Eastern Orthodox, Jews and Muslims (with a smattering of Buddhists).

For anyone who knows anything about the history of Russia- this is absurd. Before Communism, Jews and Muslims were considered irreconcilable aliens & enemies. He’s lying about trivial facts.

Then, his fantasies about WASPs, now, have nothing to do with reality. He fantasizes that tranny, gay & Globohomo ideology is basically WASPy, or “white” tool for domination over colored races, Russia & a sword wielded by US “whites” to conquer the world & to exploit it.

Globohomo ideology is, in his definition, the invention of globalist Anglo-Saxonists to subdue Africans, Asians & other coloreds- and, of course, Russia, which is a natural ally of the East and South.

His world-view is simply idiotic.

It can be easily decoded if one reads his last two big speeches & watches short videos (when he says, in translation, Christianity, he means only Eastern Orthodoxy; also, when he talks about races, and white race especially, he doesn’t include Russians in the definition).

Putin’s core world-view is that of an Eastern Orthodox Euro-Asian Jihadist- basically, this is the same as Dugin

As far as Dugin goes, he is one of those people who get carried away with grandiose, ill-defined schemes; who lack a capability for serious critical thinking; whose world-view is a goulash of indigestible and contradictory ideas; who is basically a marginal figure who has, due to confluence of circumstances, achieved prominence way beyond his actual achievements, let alone influence.

Having read many of his sources (Evola, Guenon, Schmitt, Eliade, Spengler, Heidegger, Kalajić, …), I can say, with certainty- these people are reactionary fantasists when it comes to life & politics. Some are scholars of genius -Eliade, who, when it comes to society & politics turns instantly into infantile blabbermouth; Evola is an interesting thinker in 2-3 books, but remains a completely bonkers popularizer of a subjectively interpreted theosophists’ theory of “races”; Heidegger’s mystique is rooted in his links with Nazism (Nazism is sexy), but his influence on phenomenology & existentialism- which was real- waned as these movements disintegrated – after the countercultural 60s, when wider audience could read complex & nuanced metaphysical works, East & West & which dwarfed everything Heidegger had ever written, making him a rather miserable epigone of philosophia perennis…

I could go on & on, but it’s futile.

Dugin, as well as most of his sources, shares emotional attachment to Fascist myth. Fascism is, essentially, a cartoon & disfigured vulgar ideological interpretation of mysteries of re-birth. High traditional, archetypal cults of rebirth one can find in Greek initiation mysteries (and elsewhere, but these are the most developed & richest in content); lower, or more down-to-earth examples are warrior cults like Germanic Maennerbunde, which Himmler & SS tried to imitate and renew.

And here lies the difference between Greek initiates & modern Fascist ideologues. Greeks thought that anyone is potentially a god in human clothing & the whole business of initiatory drama is to inflame the divine spark and transform the initiate into a godlike human. So they longed for human-superhuman life. On the other hand, Fascists & their confused sympathizers were disgusted with the ordinary, humdrum reality of modern life which they saw as nothing but corruption and wanted to return to some mythic, archaic & superior order which in reality never existed. What the (quasi)Fascist mind desires is a combination of will to power, abhorrence of “progress” & strong fixation on the mythical past which existed only in their skulls.

In short, Fascists are basically Romantics who have not matured & have remained stuck in a world-view of a mythized past, strongly colored by will to dominate & create a new world that is, in their mind, current realization of an uncorrupted blissful past. Such Romanticism is, of course, impervious to critical analysis & historical investigation- for them, the future is the golden archaic age.

Dugin is a typical mental mess. He not only idealizes, but completely fabricates & misinterprets Russian history & civilization; he unsuccessfully tries to heal his own weaknesses by adoration of power & a cartoon concept of his own nation- supremely capable & deserving to rule the world (or most of it), at least in his mind- without taking into account what the real, empirical world is about; which & where values of different civilizations lie; what do modern people of various cultures actually want…

Putin has absorbed & remade some of these ideas. It is wrong to think of his world-views just in terms of (geo)politics & power politics. What he spouts in his speeches is some kind of sincere belief, a grotesque religion.

To paraphrase a Polish philosopher: all this delusional adoration of power & domination has shown to be, as is the case with similar delusions, a farcical side of human bondage.

U Jugoslaviji se u skolama ucilo pucati iz puske, a sad ti Senf i HDZ uvode Gradjanski odgoj i gay lektire.

Što se tiče "banderizma" upravo su Poljaci zaslužni za njegov nastanak

Jugoslavija je bila sve osim neutralne, projekt "nesvrstanih" je bio zapadni projekt s ciljem stvaranja bloka od diktatora, kanibala od država koje su sve pripadale istočnom bloku.

To je plaćeno zapadnim kreditima.

Tito nije imao nikakav suverenitet, to je propaganda za Hercega, Jefersona i djecu jugooficira koja su imala koristi od toga.

Naporni ste sa transgender politikom, današnja Rusija veliča SSSR i gradi spomenike Leninu koji je dekriminalizirao homoseksualce i pozvao ih u partiju. Na zapadu 1920 isti bi bili strijeljani i živjelo je kršćanstvo u punom smislu.
Sad će Divizija spomenit Stalina, Stalin je zabranio istina homoseksualce ali je uništavao planski brakove, uveo feminizam.

Meni se povraća doslovno kad čitam Jeffersona o Rusima, Rusi su cajka tzv kršćanstvo.

Većina pravoslavaca su lažni kršćani, zbog toga su tako lako i prihvaćali komunizam ali Rusi su broj 1.
To je nacijas najviše pobačaja na svijetu, nacija ateista i degenerika koji su palili crkve i izveli marksizam u cijeli svijet.

Oni ne mogu biti kršćani jer nikad nisu bili kršćani,oni su pagani i normalno za njih je da ubijaju djecu, siluju.

Doslovno mi je muka kad čitam o Rusima i kršćanstvu.

Mene je kući učila rodbina, ko i milijun drugih korisnih stvari a ne da me drila partija na vlasti. Samostalan, odgovoran i sposoban pojedinac ne more proizać iz partijskih jasli.

Rusi se s kršćanstvom nisu sreli, to je mitomanija. Jedini vjernici u Rusiji su muslimani i šašica ljudi razbacanih po Sibiru.

Sta god vi nadrobili prijatelji moji, ne mozete promijeniti cinjenicu da je sada Rusija manje zlo od SAD-a. I to je sva prica.

To je irelevantno jer danas se ni Vatikan nije sastao s krscanstvom.
Svakako nisu manji krscani od Zapadnjaka.
A za mene to nije faktor uopce u ovom sukobu, totalno sporedna stvar. Uostalom vecinom i ratuju pravoslavci separatisti vs pravoslavci pro-ukr.

Amerikanci su dovodili crne robove doslovno otrgnute od svojih obitelji
u okovima da im rade i iživljavali se nad njima sve "donedavno", preko toga ne mogu prijeći.

Ja, i?
Govorim o skolama i politikama skolstva.
Referirao sam se na ranije postove, nmgu sad trazit.

"The Birth of a Nation" kao prvi film u boji i rasistički kiš sa crncima kao negativcima i njihovim pravima je snimljen 1915. U filmu je KKK klan pozitivan.

Tko je uveo tu bolest u Ameriku i onda ostatak svijeta nego Rusi?

Illinois 1961 je prva dekriminalizirala tu bolest, 41 godinu iza SSSR-a i preko horde hipija i ruskih špijuna.
Dok je žena u Americi čuvala djecu u Rusiji Stalin je radio protiv brakova, stvarao gradove kako bi uništio obitelj i žena je radila u tvornici.

Ukrajinaca je više stradalo pod Stalinom u holodomoru nego Židova pod Hitlerom.

Ja, i? Roditelji odgajaju svoju dicu, i obitelj ostala a ne država. Šta te zanima naučiš, nisi invalid pa ti triba ručica države.

Svakako nisu manje kršćani od zapadnjaka hahaha oni nisu nikakvi kršćani, zapad može potonit koliko hoće i dalje je vjerski jači. Prosječan rus crkve nije vidio, a Putin je stari udbaš, di se on sreo s kršćanstvom.

Zavisi o budućnosti koju ne znamo.
U Americi su zabranili pobačaj u par država, to je u nas nezamislivo. Koje su šanse hoće li woke transgender idioti pobjediti ili nestati kao i čitavi taj establišment koji je u sprezi sa kapitalom.

Pozdravi strica Jadrijevića.

Moguce ali rekao bih da ce se do daljnjeg establishment odrzati svakako
Jednostavni ide slippery slope i nema pomoci tu

Braćo naš odnos sa Rusijom nije uklesan u kamen. Kada budemo vidjeli bolju alternativu mi odmah skačemo na taj vlak. Nismo ko vi koji u vlaku na nuklearni pogon koji juri u provaliju gledaju okolo i govore gledaj onih debila na parnoj lokomotivi.

Ds ti šapnem nešto. da se Zapad nije odreka kršćanstva na Rusiju nitko ne bi pogleda.

Da ti šapnem nešto, u Rusiji ima više muslimana nego kršćana.

Hahah irelevantan si i ideš na ignore
To smo prožvakali puno puta na drugim temama, sad vidim da si tek prije 2m uso na forum

Ajde bit ću gostoljubiv i dati ti biser: muslimani u Rusiji su autohtoni (u svojim republikama), na Zapadu ne, već ih masovno uvoze kao jeftinu radnu snagu, time uništavajući srednju i nižu klasu i uništavajući harmoniju i homogenost stanovništva.