Nova vijest. 2 milijuna godina star led demantira ove apokaliptične manijake.
Skoro neprimjećena vijest.

https://phys.org/news/2019-10-million-y ... house.html

BBC ovih dana širi paniku u krugu ljudi koji boluju od astme. Jel cilj tih mass medija ubiti i trunku volje za životom u ljudima, bilo kakvo uživanje u životu, čak i bolesnicima. Jebeni manijaci i imbecili.
6 života da živim do kraja šestog bi me bilo sram imati ikakve veze sa ovim mentalnim pacijentima. To je pure evil.

Asthma carbon footprint 'as big as eating meat'

Former Prime Minister of Iceland: ‘Melting Glaciers Are Nothing to Panic About’

THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.22 Nov 2019421

Climate is always changing and humans are always adapting, writes Iceland’s former prime minister, so people should stop panicking over global warming.
Despite the stories delivered by “teary-eyed reporters” about the tragedy of melting glaciers, the fact is that some glaciers melt while others grow and it has been this way for all of history, says David Gunnlaugsson, who served as Iceland’s prime minister from 2013 to 2016.

“Our climate changes, but humans adapt. Instead of scaremongering, we should approach this situation on a scientific and rational basis,” Gunnlaugsson writes in the latest issue of the Spectator.

While distancing himself from the label of climate change “denier,” Gunnlaugsson insists that it is “nonsense” to suggest that humans need to “sacrifice the achievements of modern civilisation if we are to save the planet.”

Iceland offers unique insight into the relationship between man and nature, showing that environmental change is natural and nothing to be afraid of, he writes.

“Take Iceland’s melting glaciers. Troubling as a calving glacier might seem, such a phenomenon is by no means out of the ordinary,” he notes. “In fact, this process defines a glacier: they move. Glaciers shed ice at their edges as ice builds up closer to the centre. It is a spectacle we have witnessed in Iceland since the first settlers arrived in the ninth century.”

Even the widely reported “death” of the Ok glacier was an exaggerated, media-driven spectacle, Gunnlaugsson contends, since it was a “relatively small mountain-top glacier that had been receding for decades.”

“In 1901, it measured 38 sq km in size; in 1978, it was just three sq km. So the glacier that had its last rites read in August had, in fact, more or less disappeared half a century ago,” he observes.

And what is the real problem with glaciers receding? Gunnlaugsson asks. Mightn’t this be a good thing?

“When the glaciers were expanding, laying waste to what had previously been green meadows and farmlands, the people who lost their homes would hardly have been grief-stricken by the thought that one day that trend might be reversed,” he proposes, noting that when Iceland was first discovered it was completely covered in forests.

All in all, people have a remarkable ability to adapt to environmental alteration, he notes, which should keep us from freaking out over such changes.

“We Icelanders have witnessed severe changes to our natural environment,” he says. “Iceland is a country of remarkable natural alteration, and we’ve had to adapt to that fact. We realise that humans need to respect natural forces, but history has also shown us the power of human ingenuity and our ability to survive.”

We must “adapt to the ever-changing forces of nature and base our societies on essential commonsense rather than superstition or fear,” he writes.

Iceland’s melting glaciers are simply part of “an endless sequence of natural events that have shaped our country’s history,” he adds.

We must respect nature and seek to preserve our environment, but “it is vital not to overreact or fall for scare stories,” Gunnlaugsson concludes. “Whatever some might say, we shouldn’t panic about Iceland melting.”

Canadian Professor Lost Her Job for Telling the Truth About ‘Endangered’ Polar Bears

Kurt Zindulka
JAMES DELINGPOLE27 Oct 20192

A Canadian university has frozen a zoologist out of her adjunct professor post as punishment for saying the unsayable about polar bears: that populations are thriving; that they are not endangered; that stories about how they are being caused to starve by melting summer sea ice are junk science #FakeNews.

Dr Susan Crockford is one of the world’s leading experts on polar bears and had held her post as Adjunct Professor at the University of Victoria in British Columbia, Canada for 15 years.

But by speaking the truth about polar bears she fell foul of environmental activists who have long treated Ursus maritimus as one of the poster children for their “the Earth is doomed and it’s all our fault” narrative. As a result, without explanation, Crockford was ousted from her position at the university.

In an interview with Crockford this week for Breitbart News, I ask: ‘Do you think you’ve been blacklisted for telling inconvenient truths?’
She replies:
“Oh I absolutely do.”

Crockford’s “crime” was to point out that contrary to environmentalists’ computer projections, polar bear populations have increased, not decreased — despite “global warming”.

“What happened was that in 2007 there was a prediction that when sea ice declined to about 42 per cent below what it would have been in 1979 that two-thirds of the polar bears in the world would be gone. That would be 10 out of the 19 sub populations that exist.

But what has happened, we find from research, is that bear numbers have not gone down but in fact have gone up by at least 16 per cent and probably more. So the bears are thriving despite the fact that sea ice has declined dramatically.”

The “polar bears starving because of melting sea ice” story has been a staple of the green scare narrative.
In 2017, for example, footage of an emaciated polar bear rummaging pitifully through trash cans became a huge international story.

The video for National Geographic attracted over two million views. It was set to tear-jerking music and accompanied by the utterly dishonest and misleading message “This is what climate change looks like.”

In fact, as Crockford explains, this was the purest green #FakeNews.
“Starving is the leading natural cause of death for polar bears. It just happens.”

If the polar bear was starving to death, it was likely the result of its being old or sick — not because of melting summer sea ice.

Crockford says:
“Polar bears do most of their feeding in the spring time, not the summer. Starving polar bears don’t tell us anything about populations.”

Retardirana djevojka (Greta Thunberg) i milijarder (George Soros). Ko ovo puši ja bih mu dao još zaslađeno.

https://www.project-syndicate.org/comme ... al-2019-11

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Syndicate
https://www.project-syndicate.org/colum ... orge-soros
https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/ ... lete_9.pdf

Ova magla, koja se nadvila nad BiH i regionom, kao i serija nedavnih zemljotresa u juznim krajevima istog regiona, zatim pozari u Australiji, pa zahladjenje i kisa, koja Australcima nakon pozara pravi probleme, kao i topljenje leda u sjevernom dijelu planete zemlje su zivi dokaz da globalno zatopljenje nije prevara.

Jarane bolan ne bio, kako oto?

Borbu protiv opste histerije vezane za klimatske promjene povesce Naomi Seibt, devetnaestogodisnja jutjub influenserka, koja ce na Konferenciji konzervativnih političkih akcija (CPAC) negirati tvrdnju da ljudska aktivnost doprinosi zagrijavanju planete.

Normalno je da se CO2 oslobađa sa visokim temperaturama. Da se otopi permafrost u Sibiru otišao bi taj graf u nebo.
U teoriji. U stvarnom životu kroz milijune godina povijesno je bitno gdje se zagrijavanje događa. Hipotetski u Sahari ni 15C više ne bi ništa značilo za planet, u Sibiru/Aljaska i 5C više bi oslobodilo previše CO2 u atmosferu.

NOAA, taj tvoj graf, US državna ogranizacija (kao i CIA). Kao i USAID koja ništa drugo ne radi osim "nation building" i "color revolutions".
https://electroverse.net/the-top-climat ... as-frauds/
https://www.investors.com/politics/edit ... ing-scare/



https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/113 ... rming.html

Ti si kao kreacionisti ili ravnozemljaši, oko ovog pitanja.

Evo Trump je rekao da je coronavirus hoax, je li se slažeš i s time.

Kakve veze ima kreacionizam sa ravnozemljašima?

Pa zato što su to sve leveli odbijanja znanstvenih činjenica na temelju raznih neznanstvenih motiva (politickih, vjerskih, ili čisto posljedica razine znanstvene edukacije), poredano prema najluđima:

ravnozemljaši (najluđi)
korona je od 5G mrežeri
mladozemljaši
kreacionisti
antivaxeri

Sa prve dvije stavke se mogu složiti...

Iskreno, nema većih luđaka od npr. evolucionista, to su vjernici samo takvi jer gutati takva *** kakva se njima serviraju...treba jaka vjera za svariti.
Ova priča o ekskluzivitetu znanosti za određene grupe, mačku o rep. Imaš o tome na drugim temama, o vrhunskim top znanstvenicima kreacionistima npr.