Čapljina mi je uvijek bila jedan od najsvjetlijih primjera fino uređenih i urbanih manjih gradova. Puno zelenila, široke ceste, sve planski rađeno; uglavnom, bravo za Čapljinu!

Super slike, oduševljen sam! Bravo Čapljina!

http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabela

kad smo već kod čapljine, otkud ovih 300 srba?
jesu li domicilni ili se radi o kakvom naselju doseljenih radnika?
ima li ih još?

Prelijepa Čapljina.

PREBACITE OVE SLIKE TU.
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=724

Nagađanja oko toga gdje će oskarovac Danis Tanović raditi svoj novi film „Cirkus Kolumbija“, inspiriran istoimenim romanom Ivice Đikića, prekinuo je Zlatko Papac izvršni direktor čapljinske tvrtke „Makart hoteli“: „Koncem rujna i tri tjedna u studenom, hotel „Mogorjelo“ je rezerviran za filmsku ekipu Danisa Tanovića koji će na području Čapljine, Gabele i Ljubuškog snimati novi film“ - istaknuo je direktor Papac govoreći o poslovanju čapljinskog hotela do kraja godine.

Naravno da je ova vijest osim hotelijera, obradovala i druge Čapljince. Dok stariji prave planove kako proviriti u filmski šušur, mlađi priželjkuju uloge statista. Odmah po informaciji da će Danis Tanović snimati na jugu Hercegovine, stigla je i vijest da će glavne uloge tumačiti poznati glumci s prostora bivše države Mira Furlan i Miki Manojlović.

Audicija 18. rujna

Ekipa oskarovca Danisa Tanovića nakon tajanstvenih priprema i odabira lokacije, prelazi na konkretne poteze za novi film. Tako je za petak, 18. rujna najavljen casting (audicija) za glumce i statiste. Casting će se održati u hotelu „Mogorjelo“ od 11 do 16 sati!
Uglavnom, zahvaljujući oskarovcu Danisu Tanoviću čiji su roditelji podrijetlom iz Gacka u istočnoj Hercegovini, Čapljina bi tijekom jeseni trebala dobiti filmski image.


D. Musa | CAportal.info

Godišnja potreba za 40-50 stanova u Čapljini

Stari su stanovi rasprodani, gradnja novih je manja od potreba, a cijena novih je 1600 KM po četvornom metru

Posljednjih godina u Čapljini su se izgradila tek dva stambeno-poslovna kompleksa sa stotinjak stanova. Potražnja je u ovo vrijeme višestruko veća od ponude.

Nedostatak stanova

To najbolje pokazuje podatak da su skoro svi stanovi u novom stambeno-poslovnom kompleksu Peline II rasprodam već, na početku gradnje. - Ostala su tek dva stana koja su također u fazi prodaje, pa će Čapljina doći u situaciju da uopće nema novih stanova. U ovom je kompleksu ukupno 67 stanova, poslovni prostori i garaže, koje su i najtraženije. Tih 67 stanova ipak je jako malo. Godišnje bi se trebalo graditi 40-50 novih stanova - upozorava Stjepan Rubinić, šef gradilišta. Gradnja novih stanova nameće se kao velika potreba jer su i stari stanovi u velikoj većini već rasprodani. Tako su oni koji se žele stambeno zbrinuti došli u tešku situaciju da više uopće nemaju stanova na izboru. - U planu je i gradnja novog objekta sa 30-ak stanova s garažama koje su u ovom trenutku dosta traženje od poslovnih prostora. To bi bio projekt Peline III. Izvori novca i materijala u posljednje vrijeme dosta su se izmijenili, pa se zbog toga i kasnilo u projektu Peline II.

Odraz krize

A zbog recesije i mnogi investitori dosta kalkuliraju u nakani gradnje novih stambenih objekata. Tu je i nezaposlenost i nedostatak novca pa se investitori plaše da im objekti ostanu prazni, ističe Rubinić te dodaje kako je cijena novih stanova u Pelinama II 1600 KM po četvornome metru.

Gradnja prvog stambenog objekta s dizalom

U tijeku je odrađivanje i onih sitnih detalja na stambeno-poslovnom kompleksu Peline li koji je ujedno i prvi stambeni objekt u Čapljini s ugrađenim dizalom.
Obišli smo ove nove stambene zgrade koje nude vrhunske uvjete stanovanja, a zanimljivo je da će i svaki stan imati zasebno mjerilo za vodu na koje će biti spojena i garaža.

Cijena starih 1000 KM

U Čapljini je trenutačno gotovo nemoguće kupiti i stare stanove čija se cijena po četvornom metru kreće od 900 do 1000 konvertibilnih maraka. No, i takvih je stanova jako malo, a prilika se ukaže samo kada netko iseljava iz Čapljine pa prodaje svoj stan ili se pak nekome pojavi višak stambenog prostora pa ga se želi riješiti.

Frano Matić, Večernji list | CAportal.info

http://www.caportal.info/index.php?opti ... &Itemid=11


Za deset mjeseci čapljinski turizam potukao je poratni rekord u broju turističkih noćenja. Lani je na čapljinskom, uz simboličan doprinos stolačkog područja, ostvareno 5.223 noćenja, a u razdoblju siječanj – listopad ove godine, već je registrirano 5.618 noćenja ili 395 noćenja više nego cijele prošle godine.



U listopadu su na ovom području ostvarena 864 noćenja 32 manje od rujanskog rekorda. Glavninu noćenja ostvarili su objekti tvrtke „Makart hoteli“ hotel „Mogorjelo“ u Čapljini; 563 noćenja od čega 301 inozemnih gostiju, te motel „Park“ u Parku prirode Hutovo blato – 199 noćenja od čega 121 su realizirali stranci.

Inače, u listopadu na čapljinsko-stolačkom području registriran je posjet 249 gostiju, od čega su 152 bila inozemna.

Zadovoljstvo rezultatima u turizmu ne krije ni voditelj čapljinsko-stolačke podružnice TZ H-N županije Dragan Bradvica, koji na aluziju da dobar dio zasluga za snažan rast broja noćenja pripada snimanju filma „ Cirkus Columbia “, čija je ekipa na čelu s redateljem Danisom Tanovićem smještena u čapljinskom hotelu polušaljivo odgovorio: „ Iduće godine snimat ćemo novi film! “.

Dušan Musa, VL | CAportal.info

Čapljina je baš lijepa.

Čuvajte svoj grad čapljinci !

Croatia Airlines iduće tri godine toči samo vina iz Hercegovine



Joško Ponoš / CROPIX

Po riječima Miće Crnjca, vlasnika vinarije “Domanovići”, vino blatina iduće tri godine bit će zastupljeno u “Croatia Airlinesu”.

Prema najnovijem ugovoru ove hercegovačke vinarije i poznate hrvatske aviokompanije, ni jedno drugo vino u tom se razdoblju neće moći konzumirati pri letovima kompanije izuzevši blatine, koja je proizvedena u vinariji “Domanovići”, u kojoj se, inače, primjenjuje najmodernija francuska tehnologija.

Također, vrijedi spomenuti kako se u ovoj vinariji nalazi i najveća drvena bačva na prostoru Hercegovine, sa zapreminom od 16.230 litara.

D. IVANKOVIĆ

CHE Čapljina:

http://www.ephzhb.ba/Publikacije-Vijesn ... HE_web.pdf

Hvala na linku. Mnogi ne znaju da je CHE Čapljina specifična po mnogo čemu.

Ova vijest je demantirana od strane CA. Nemaju ekskluzivno pravo.

Za one koje zanima stanje u Lasti evo prenosim zanimljiv članak. Rajvosa znam da je tebe zanimalo.

ne znam koliko je realno uvjetovati nekome da u iduće vrijeme mora zaposliti određen broj ljudi i izvšiti egzaktna ulaganja.
sama činjenica da su ipak nešto uložili i novozaposlili upućuje da imaju namjeru nešto i napraviti ali u uvjetima borbe na tržištu kapacitete treba prilagođacvati potražnji. zvečevo je solidna kompanije i ne sumnjam da će čim im se ulkaže prilika još više razviti lastu i povećati proizvodnju.

Hvala. Pitanje je koliko su realne usporedbe sa prijeratnom proizvodnjom...rekao bih da se dosta degradirao "brand" i da je dosta zaboravljen. Je li Zvečevo imalo dobre namjere...tko zna, ali je skandalozan takav odnos prema onome što su se ugovorno obvezali.

Nije realna usporedba sa proizvodnjom prije rata ali je zanimljiv podatak. Brand je sigurno degradirao ali eto ako ćemo biti skromni dobro je da tvornica radi i zapošljava ljude. Ja ovdje u Zagrebu u brojnim prodavaonicama mogu kupiti Lastine proizvode i to one glavne. Lastine štrudle sa oznakom K plus se mogu kupiti u svim Konzumovim prodajnim centrima. Moralo bi se poraditi na reklami. Paradoks je kad dođem u Čapljinu da u nekim prodavaonicama ne mogu kupiti Lastine proizvode jer im količinski uvjetuju nabavku pa se nekima ne isplati jer ne mogu prodati sve na vrijeme. Što se Zvečeva tiče nemam pravih informacija, znam samo ono se priča a priča se da iza svega ne stoje poštene namjere. Što se tiče stanja na burzi dionicama se trguje sa tri puta manjom cijenom od nominalne, rezultati za 2008. pokazuju rast prihoda od prodaje u odnosu na prethodnu godinu i iskazana je dobit. Kad uhvatim vremena proučit ću financijska izvješća po svim bitnim pokazateljima.

http://www.aneks8komisija.com.ba/main.php?id_struct=50&lang=4&action=view&id=1318

Malo informacije od Gabele (Troja/Drijeva) - na Engleski jezikom

Location

Gabela is an archaeological site on the right bank of the river Neretva, 5 km. south of Čapljina.


Historical Information

Gabela is situated in the navigable lower course of the Neretva, off the major road linking the coast with the mountainous hinterland. The marketplace of Drijevo was located In the area between Višić and St. Vid; during the Middle Ages, and in particular in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, it was one of the major markets of the Bosnian State. Whether located on the right bank of the Neretva on the present-day site of Gabela, or across the river on the left bank, (Tesara [stone-cutter or carpenter] Višići), or in St Vid (formerly known as Narona), this large marketplace with a separate fort, customs house, and harbour, was a widely dispersed settlement on the banks of the Neretva, the course of which was rather different then from now. Dubrovnik (Ragusa) sources refer to it as Drijevo, portus Narenti, forum Narenti and gabella Narente. The name Gabella appears for the first time in 1465, and with the coming of Ottoman rule, Gabella became the customary name. Various political and commercial interests strove for dominance over Drijevo: the Ragusan Republic, the Serb rulers, local rulers and feudal lords and the Hungarian kings, and later (in the second half of the fifteenth century) the Venetians and Ottomans. The Ottomans penetrated as far as Drijeva and the lower course of the river Neretva for the first time in 1448, seizing the major fortified site of Počitelj from the Hungarians and finally establishing firm rule over it in 1471. At some point between 1471 and 1473, when the Ottomans finally drove the Vlatković family out of the region, Gabela was also finally conquered. At the same time, once the situation had calmed down in the area around the lower Neretva, the merchants of Drijeva, who had taken refuge in Pelješac, began gradually returning to Drijevo. The area thus regained its economic importance, in addition to its strategic significance to the new rulers. In the defter (official register) of the sandjak of Herzegovina for the years 1475/1477, there is reference to the port of the nahija (administrative region, “municipality”), with Gabela as its principal centre.

Thanks to its natural and strategic position, navigable river and proximity to the coast, Gabela became the principal defensive outpost in the lower Neretva valley. The Gabela fort, with its series of fortifications along the frontier between the Ottoman and the Venetian possessions, long remained a bar to attacks by the Venetians and rebels from the south. Between 1694 and 1715 the Venetians took Gabela, partly rebuilt it, and strengthened part of the existing fortifications. In late 1715, prior to their withdrawal, fearing that the Ottomans might recapture Gabela, the Venetians mined and set fire to much of the fortifications and the towers in the immediate vicinity. Following the Požarevac Peace Treaty of 1718, Gabela lost the economic and defence importance it had had for centuries.



Legal Status to Date

Pursuant to the provisions of the law, and by ruling of the Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments of SR BiH, no. 05-771-1 dated 9 March 1967 in Sarajevo, the site of the old fort of Gabela, Municipality Čapljina, was designed as a cultural monument of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The site is registered on the Provisional List of National Monuments of Bosnia and Herzegovina as no. 180.



2. Description of the Monument

Architecture

The fort of Gabela is situated on a low elevation, at an altitude of 68 m above sea-level, which dominates the surroundings thanks to its strategic position. The area within the walls and towers is 28,042 m2. The fort forms an irregular polygon, adapted to the configuration of its natural setting.

The earliest reliable data on the old fort of Gabela dates from the mid sixteenth century (1559), but to judge from its appearance and that of the towers it could have been build even before it fell to the Ottomans. Kreševljaković states that it was built by the Venetians in 1452 (Kreševljaković 1958, p. 415), a hypothesis for which there are good historical arguments, and the shape of the towers is typical of the Middle Ages, while the ground plan shows central European features. It should not be forgotten that the Hungarians were very much present at that time. This hypothesis could be proved or disproved by archaeological excavations to uncover the stratum beneath that of the Ottoman period.

The Old Fort or citadel consists of two irregular rectangles, connected only by a large entrance gate. The western area, known as the Great Fort, is much larger than the eastern or Lesser Fort. The total area of the Old Fort is 4,249 m2. The west wall of the Great Fort (measuring 59 X 71 X 47.5 X 72.5) ends in two towers at each end, circular in plan, whilst the third tower is common to both forts. At the entrance on the north side, which was barrel vaulted, there was a barbican. The west and south walls are 1.90 m thick, and the north and east walls are 1.65 m thick. The south wall is the best preserved, standing 7 m. in height. The upper part of the ramparts had an unbroken line of loopholes. The towers were also mounted with cannons, as confirmed by some historical sources. The area inside the Great Fort is almost level, and was used to house the garrison. Among items that have been identified, parts of a water cistern (measuring 11 x 4 m) have been preserved. The method of construction of the Lesser Fort (measuring 33 X 26.9 X 34.8 X 26.8) makes it the strongest element of the entire system of fortifications of Gabela. The southern ramparts are built on a cliff, and where they abut onto the west wall there stands the round tower common to both, the walls of which still stand to a height of 10 m. On the inner side of the ramparts there are to be seen the remains of wooden beams that bore the roof beams of the buildings that abutted onto the walls, while in the upper part of the walls there are the sockets that held the wooden beams bearing the parapet walk used by the military garrison. As with the Great Fort, there were also premises for military use here. In the central area of the Lesser Fort are the remains of the Emperor’s Mosque or Mosque of el Fatih, later converted by the Venetians into the church of St. Katarina (St. Anto) in 1649 and again rebuilt as a mosque on the ruins of the church by the Ottomans in 1718. During excavations in the Lesser Fort in 1979, a smaller cistern was found in the central area, adjacent to the Mosque.

The New Fort or citadel was built between the years 1660 (when Ali-Paša Čengić became Sandjak Bey [governor] of Herzegovinia for the first time) and 1665 when Evlija Čelebi described it as a completed fortification. This part of the Fort occupies the greater part of the area north of the Old Citadel, with which it forms a single larger defensive complex. The main entrance was on the west side, for easier access to the settlement. This gate also gave onto the semicircular-vaulted watchtower. By analogy with other more substantial fortifications of this kind built by the Ottomans, it may be deduced that the auxiliary entry was built by the Venetians, who captured the Fort in the late seventeenth century and gave it its final appearance by adding the radial sector of the ramparts (the Vauban system of bastions, which the Ottomans did not built in this area).

In the east wall there is yet another entrance, the door-jambs of which are the finest example of Venetian craftsmanship in the entire complex. There is yet another specific feature in the method of construction of the ramparts in the New Fort. The outer face of the perimeter walls are constructed with a lesser incline in so-called škarp, using less mortar, while on the inner face they were banked with earth, the weight of which was the main cause of their deterioration, particularly on the northern side.


Archaeological Finds

M. Gavrilović carried out archaeological excavations in 1981 and 1982, but excavated no deeper than the base of the Ottoman period, fearing to dig any deeper for a number of reasons, although there were indications that there was also a mediaeval stratum in the fort. During the course of these excavations some fragments of stone ornamentation were found alongside the south wall of the mosque/church, with a frieze of floral motifs. Within the ramparts a large bomb, parts of an exploded bomb and a small iron cannonball were found.

The documentation was lost as a result of war damage to the Institute for the Protection of Monuments in Mostar.

Within the ramparts there is a stone slab with the image of a lion in shallow relief, the symbol of the Republic of Venice. The slab dates from the period 1693-1715, when the Venetians held Gabela.