Outside Agitators

A Cairo court has convicted 43 men and women of using foreign funds to foment unrest inside Egypt in connection with the overthrow of President Hosni Mubarak.

Sixteen of those convicted were Americans. All but one, Robert Becker of the National Democratic Institute, had already departed. Becker fled this week rather than serve two years in an Egyptian prison.

And U.S. interventionists are in an uproar.

“Appalling and offensive,” said Sen. Pat Leahy of the verdicts.

“The 2011 revolution was supposed to end the repressive climate under Mubarak,” said The Wall Street Journal of our ally of 30 years whom Hillary Clinton called a family friend.

This “crackdown,” decries The Washington Post, was defended with “cheap nationalism and conspiracy theories.” As for Egypt’s proposed new law for regulating foreign-funded groups promoting democracy, it is “based on … repressive and xenophobic logic.”

Yet the questions raised by both the Cairo and Moscow crackdowns on U.S.-funded “democracy” groups cannot be so airily dismissed.

For these countries have more than a small point.

While U.S.-funded democracy promotion is portrayed as benign, the National Endowment for Democracy, the International Republican Institute, DNI and Freedom House have been linked to revolutions that brought down regimes in Serbia, Ukraine, Georgia, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, and nearly succeeded in Belarus.

People who pride themselves on bringing about revolutions should not whine when targeted regimes treat them like troublemakers.

And who directs these “pro-democracy” groups?

Before 2011, Freedom House was headed by ex-CIA Director Jim Woolsey, who says we are in “World War IV.” The IRI is chaired by John McCain, who pushed for U.S. intervention in the Russia-Georgia war and is clamoring for air strikes on Syria.

The DNI chairman is ex-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who says: “We are the indispensable nation. We stand tall, and we see further than other countries into the future.”

Is it not understandable to patriots of the original “Don’t Tread on Me” republic that foreigners might resent paid U.S. agents operating inside their countries to alter the direction of their politics?

We have a right to advance our democratic values, we say.

But for the United States to push, for example, for freedom of speech, press and assembly in the People’s Republic of China is to promote political action that must lead to the fall of Beijing’s single-party state. Do we not understand why that might be seen by the Chinese Communist Party of Xi Jinping as subversive?

In the Cold War Americans learned that not only was the Communist Party U.S.A. a wholly owned subsidiary of Joseph Stalin’s Comintern, that party had deeply infiltrated the U.S. government and Hollywood. In the late ’40s and early ’50s, America was convulsed over communist penetration of our institutions.

Martin Luther King Jr. was wiretapped by J. Edgar Hoover at the direction of JFK and Attorney General Robert Kennedy because he refused to dump an adviser, Stanley Levison, who was a communist and thought to be a Soviet spy.

Were the Kennedys being “repressive and xenophobic”?

If we were apoplectic that Soviet-funded communists were seeking to influence our culture and politics, why ought not other countries, with cultures and institutions far different from our own, react even as we did?

In the stricter societies of the Islamic world, governments have enacted laws regarding alcohol, premarital sex, divorce, abortion, homosexuality, gay marriage and religious conversions different from any such laws in the U.S.A.

In some of those countries, such activities can produce floggings, amputations, stonings and beheadings. In many of these countries, children are indoctrinated in the Islamic faith in government-supported schools. Not here.

We may deplore this, but where do we get the right to intervene in the internal affairs of these countries if they do not threaten us?

And are we really consistent in our democracy promotion?

How many U.S.-funded agents of Freedom House, NED, IRI and NDI are in Bahrain demanding elections that would permit the Shia majority to dump the king and oust our 5th Fleet from its Persian Gulf base?

How would we react if Riyadh funneled billions of petrodollars into organizations and agents to finance Wahhabi madrassas and assist local Muslim communities in the U.S.A. with their efforts to enact sharia law?

What lies behind U.S. interventions in the internal affairs of countries all over the world?

There is, first, the residual Cold War mindset. What we did for Solidarity in Poland was right and successful, and we cannot give up this tool of democracy just because the Cold War is over.

Second, there is the arrogance of power, the End-of-History babble about democracy being the last, best hope of earth to which all nations should aspire — and if they don’t, give them a kick in that direction.

Once the most admired of nations, America is no longer so.

Why not? Because of our compulsive interventions, military and political, in the internal affairs of nations that are none of our business.

Defund the American Comintern, and bring the outside agitators home.

http://buchanan.org/blog/outside-agitators-5607

Naši dragi liberalni borci za demokraciju ili agitatori kako vam drago.

Šokirani su, šokirani!

Da netko može zabraniti te njihove zakulisne makinacije rušenja vlada zakonom i to nekakvom represivnom i ksenofobnom logikom.

Kako to samo mogu! Ti Egipćani. Uopće ne cijene liberalne napore boraca za demokraciju.

Nastavak je glazba za srpske uši pa da i susjedi malo uživaju.

Doduše možda ih ovo umiri.

Ma da nebi. Liberalni smrad.

Prvo stvori probleme pa kad eskaliraju onda je ksenofobija kriva.

Mrš.

Gledate li emisije o onim preperima?

Čini mi se da u drugim delovima sveta takvih imbecila nema.

Ono što me najviše iznenađuje je činjenica da se oni pripremaju za borbu protiv sopstvenih sugrađana koji bi im, zaboga, mogli oteti one hiljade konzervi i pobiti ih na spavanju.

Govori li vam to dovoljno o prirodi američkog društva?

To je dokaz da se od migracijama sklepane populacije ne može napraviti nacija, sa svime što ona podrazumeva.

To nije nikakav dokaz za to. Ljudima je dosadno, neki nemaju izazova, hobija, mnogo različitih ljudi a tu je i televizija da ih snima.

Soroš je zaboravio piti tablete.

THE WASHINGTON POST reports:

More white people died in the United States last year than were born, a surprising slump coming more than a decade before the Census Bureau says that the ranks of white Americans will likely drop with every passing year.

Population estimates for 2012 released Thursday show what’s known as a natural decrease — a straightforward calculation of births minus deaths — of about 12,400 people among the nation’s 198 million non-Hispanic whites.

Only if reporters Carol Morello and Ted Mellnik do not read their own newspaper, in which various means of limiting births and demoralizing the white population are celebrated every single day, could they possibly consider this news “surprising.” Since it is unlikely that they do not read their own newspaper, their use of this word is entirely dishonest.

Comments after The New York Times story. This was the first one I saw:

Eduardo
Los Angeles
Verified

The melting pot has never been better than it is now. I encounter many individuals who defy race classification, with a heritage that is clearly diverse, and they are all wonderful people. If there’s any real hope for the future of this country, it will be with the dying off of those who are very conservative…and white. They are responsible for much of what is wrong in our society right now — divisive, intolerant, hateful. The melting pot can only get better.


Imagine the newspaper publishing a comment that said the country would be better if blacks were “dying off.” Eduardo is permitted open, flagrant racial supremacy and hatred.

Another commenter, Michael A. Livingston, probably white, writes:

It’s a sign of national health that nobody really knows when whites will become a minority and, by and large, no one cares.


We shall see.

Prava tema za doca.

Ma i za vas i za nas. Kad postanu Brazil vidjet ćemo kako će se plest u svako pitanje diljem svijeta.

iako se po medijima vrti podatak da je u 2011. godini po prvi put rođeno više manjinske djece od Non-Hispanic White (kako ih zovu), to baš i nije točno kad se pogledaju službeni podaci.

2011. rođeni po rasnim i etničkim skupinama (kako Amerikanci to kažu)
Non-Hispanic White 2.150.926 (54.4%)
Hispanic (of all racial groups) 912.290 (23.1%)
Black 583.079 (14.7%)
Asian and Pacific (including of Hispanic origin) 253.864 (6.4%)
Amerindian 46.536
Ostali ...

Ukupno rođeno u SAD-u 2011. godine: 3.953.593

uz jednu napomenu: The natural increase is slightly smaller than shown for non-Hispanic whites and slightly different for non-Hispanic blacks because the birth figures shown refer to mothers of that race, not the children. Most nonwhite babies of non-Hispanic white mothers are either Hispanic or black, and non-Hispanic black mothers occasionally have Hispanic children. On the other hand, all children born to Hispanic mothers, even if the mothers are white Hispanic, are counted as Hispanic.

Biće veselo ako/kad WASPovi krenu da napuštaju brod.

A gdje će, u Južnu Afriku? U Nunavut?

Ma neće nigdje bježati. Prejaki su i moćni i ako postanu manjina, drže sav kapital i držat će sve velike američke gradove poput NY i LA ili barem najvažniji i elitni dio gradova.

PS: što se tiče Brazila, pošto mnogi uzimaju Brazila kao primjer kako izgleda nacija ako dođe do mješanja, bijelci u Brazilu su dalje u velikom broju, jako je velika zajednica i imaju u odnosu na procenata oko 50% što je opet dovoljno da se očuvaju. Pa vidite npr. Sao Paolo, bijela zajednica ima zidove oko sebe da se zaštite.

Svetsku turneju.

Ma da se oni odluče danas bi imali svu Ameriku. Njihova bolest je problem ne nečija druga.



Ove patuljke gurnu preko granice. Crncima daju par država. Bijele asimiliraju. I stvar riješena. I opet mogu do dominacije punog spektra.

Ali...veliko ali...oni su sami sebi najveći problem...etnomazohizam iliti svaki drugi je skoro ko Nataša Kandić pa ti vidi kako im je.

"A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself within." Will Durant

Two Ex-Marines Sentenced to Death After They Raped Iraq Vet’s Wife in Front of Him and Then Shot Couple in the Head


Horror attack: Sergeant Jan Pietrzak, 24, and his wife Quiana Jenkins-Pietrzak, 26, were bound and gagged before being shot in the head


Convicted: Tyrone Miller, left, and Emrys John, right, have been sentenced to the death penalty, while Kevin Cox, centre, was sentenced to life in prison without parole

Two ex-Marines have been sentenced to death after they stormed the home of an Iraq veteran and his wife and shot the newly married couple dead.

Sgt. Jan Pietrzak, 24, was forced to watch as his wife Quiana Jenkins-Pietrzak, 26, was raped, before the couple were shot in the head by their attackers, according to court documents.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z2X2GNOX2C



Ovo nije normalno.

Šuška se kako je Edvard Snuden uspio da se dočepa Rusije. Ako je to istina onda Amerima jedino što je preostalo kada je u pitanju ovaj slučaj jeste da se uzdanu u Putinovu dobru volju.

Prije desetak minuta je Snowden sletio na moskovski aerodrom. Upravo na CNN-u izvještavaju o tome.

Ja mislio na tako tajne zadatke se stavljaju ljudi koji rade po 30 godina u tajnoj službi. Oni kupe informatičare sa Biroa.

Ali ništa čudno, otkad nema USSR sve je to postalo za kurac. Po danu na tajnim zadacima letaju okolo u crnim helikopterima. Ludilo neviđenih proporcija.

Danas otvoriš facebook i saznaš jednaku količinu informacija kao nekad iz cijele godine praćenja. Danas više nema potrebe za James Bomdovima, nekakvim likovima koji će se kretati u visokim društvima, zavoditi žene diplomata i preko njih krasti informacije, traženiji su obični nerdovi...

Nego, Snowdena će u Rusiji smatrati herojem, dok su Kinezi u svim anketama govorili da je lik izdajica, kad je ulazio u službu potpisao je ugovor i prekršio ga, to po njima častan čovjek ne čini...
Koji mentalitet

Nije to poanta. Već da moraš zaposliti provjerene i pouzdane osobe.
Ne radi se samo o Facebook, već su imali i podatke kreditnih kartica od ljudi i SMS-ove.