Sjeo ti je Ristić, ha?

Znao sam.

Neloš je.

Totalitarianism in the Bedroom


But now, lawmakers in California want to pass a bill that would require what they call “affirmative consent.” Nobody can quite define it, but it sure sounds good on the Evening News!

What the affirmative consent standard requires is not just communication about sex; it’s constant awareness that you may be raping your partner if you don’t read the signals properly and if you fail to notice that there’s some ambiguity to be cleared up. (According to the California bill, “if there is confusion as to whether a person has consented or continues to consent to sexual activity, it is essential that the participants stop the activity until the confusion can be clearly resolved.”) Whether anyone could feel particularly "sexy" under such conditions seems doubtful; eternal vigilance may be the price of liberty, but it's hardly a ticket to good sex.

http://www.mindingthecampus.com/origina ... DUh9W.dpuf



I'm not making this shit up.

Ovo je van svake zdrave pameti.

Dobri star dani kada je silovanje bilo nešto izrazito nasilno, pod prijetnjom noža i na ulici. A ne danas, ako ima više od pola promila i prijavi te, ti si silovatelj.

Spike Lee o fenomenu gentrifikacije (dolasku bogatih, većinom bijelih stanovnika u bivši crnački geto koji se time transformira i o užasnim posljedicama koje to prouzrokuje.

Ne kaže to, nego pita zašto je potrebna gentrifikacija da bi se smeće odvozilo na tjednoj bazi, da bi škole bile bolje, da bude manje kriminala.

A ča san ja reka?

Kako se u SAD-u slavi black history month. Ovo je otprilike kao da se male Bošnjake na par sati veže za kolce ili na tjedan dana odvaja od obitelji da vide kako je bilo janjičarima. Bolesno, kolektivno se kažnjavaju djeca za nešto što se radilo prije 150 godina. I to ne od njihovih predaka vjerojatno. A Bošnjama teško Njegoša čitati

Ovo je čisti autorasizam.

Općenito se superiorne grupe i pojedinci muče krivnjom i odgovornošću dok inferiorne optužuju sve druge za svoje jade osim sebe.

Nažalost na ovim prostorima baš se ne iskazujemo po tom polju.

Baš me zanima kad će muslimani napravit nešto slično za milijune crnih Afrikanaca koji su prodani u roblje u muslimanski svijet...a da potomaka skoro da i nema...odapeli od oduševljenja i divnih uvijeta rada...

Black & Hispanic Pass Rates Drop in Elite High School Exams

Aaron Short, New York Post, March 12, 2014

More black and Hispanic students took the entrance exam to get into the city’s elite high schools this year, but their pass rates were as dismal as ever, officials said Tuesday.

Of the 5,096 students accepted by eight specialized schools, just 5  percent were black and 7 percent were Hispanic.

Nationally recognized Staten Island Tech won’t have a single black student among its incoming class of 344 freshmen. Last year, it had five.

Bronx Science, consistently ranked one of the highest-achieving high schools in the city, sent admission letters to 968 middle-school students, but only 18 were black.

The story was much the same at Stuyvesant, where seven black students and 21 Hispanics were among the 952 who made the cut.

Even Brooklyn Tech, which Mayor de Blasio’s son, Dante, attends, will welcome just 127 black students and 130 Hispanics among 1,844 in its freshman class of ’14.

De Blasio has called for an overhaul of the admissions system, saying one exam shouldn’t be the sole criteria for selecting the most qualified students.

“These schools are the jewels and the crown for our public-school system,” the mayor said. “They produce extraordinary leaders who will be part of the leadership of the city going forward.”

Of 27,817 students who took the entrance test last October, 46 percent were black or Hispanic. That’s up from 43 percent in 2012.

{snip}

“It’s not good for the city,” said David Jones, CEO of the Community Service Society of New York. “We have to come up with an admission system that is wider than this one-size-fits-all exam.”

Jones suggested that elite high schools consider grade-point averages and teacher recommendations along with admissions exams.

{snip}

Schools Chancellor Carmen Fariña said the administration will make changes.

“We must do more to reflect the diversity of our city in our top-tier schools—and we are committed to doing just that,” she said.

http://nypost.com/2014/03/12/black-hisp ... ool-exams/

grad New York
Latino 28.6%
Afro 25.5%

Elitne škole
Latino 7%
Afro 5%



Obama 2012. 81.19% glasova



Gradonačelnik New Yorka s obitelji.

Najliberalniji grad u Americi...

Što zaključiti, koju poruku poslati...

Race-Baiting Obama Agency Guilty of Its Own ‘Racism’

Tired of being accused of racism-by-statistics by Obama’s new consumer agency, bankers have turned the tables, using the agency’s personnel data to expose its own racial bias and hypocrisy.

Since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was set up by the president as the new credit cop on the financial block, it’s used statistics showing racial differences in mortgage and car-loan terms to sue lenders for unintentional race bias.

To Obama’s credit cops, this is prima facie proof of discrimination, regardless of whether differing credit backgrounds easily explain such gaps (which they do).

But now CFPB has been hoisted by its own statistical petard, guilty of its own racial disparities.

According to confidential internal stats obtained by the American Banker, “CFPB managers show a pattern of ranking white employees distinctly better than minorities in performance reviews used to grant raises and issue bonuses.”

In fact, the agency’s own 2013 data show that whites were twice as likely as African-Americans to receive the CFPB’s highest job performance grade of “5.” Over 20% of white staffers got top ratings—and were held up as “role models”—compared with just 10.5% of blacks.

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorial ... rities.htm

Obamina vladina agencija koja nadgleda financijsko tržište i optužuje banke da diskriminiraju jer ne odobravaju kredite jednako ljudima različite rase (iako podaci o kreditnoj sposobnosti objašnjavaju zašto postoji razlika među rasama) kriva za vlastiti "rasizam".

Prema internoj evaluaciji zaposlenika te agencije, 20% bijelih zaposlenika je dobilo peticu dok je 10% crnaca dobilo peticu.

Što reći, što zaključiti...

Osim da Bankarski Imperij uzvraća udarac.

And institutions require trust
‘Intelligent People Are More Likely to Trust Others’
Medical Xpress, March 12, 2014

Intelligent people are more likely to trust others, while those who score lower on measures of intelligence are less likely to do so, says a new study.

Oxford University researchers based their finding on an analysis of the General Social Survey, a nationally representative public opinion survey carried out in the United States every one to two years.

The authors say one explanation could be that more intelligent individuals are better at judging character and so they tend to form relationships with people who are less likely to betray them.

Another reason could be that smarter individuals are better at weighing up situations, recognising when there is a strong incentive for the other person not to meet their side of the deal.

The study, published in the journal PLOS ONE, supports previous research that analysed data on trust and intelligence from European countries. The authors say the research is significant because social trust contributes to the success of important social institutions, such as welfare systems and financial markets. In addition, research shows that individuals who trust others report better health and greater happiness.

Lead author Noah Carl, from the Department of Sociology, said: ‘Intelligence is shown to be linked with trusting others, even after taking into account factors like marital status, education and income. This finding supports what other researchers have argued, namely that being a good judge of character is a distinct part of human intelligence which evolved through natural selection. However, there are other possible interpretations of the evidence, and further research is needed to disentangle them.’

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-03-i ... eople.html

Inače ovaj gore luđak je pravi primjer zašto je naziv teme točan.

Kognitivni poremećaj.

Ovo ne može biti normalno.

Enter nadam se da će ti netko pomoći.

Kako si ti normalan i zdrav kad si rasista?? , kako rasizam može biti nešto normalno??

Ja nikog ne mrzim zbog rase i nacije , dok ti mrziš.
Ja jeidno mogu mrzeti takve pojedince kao što si ti jer mrzeti mrzitelje i fašiste je poželjno.

Tako da objasni mi kako sam ja poremećen a ti nisi??

Ma ti si jednostavno nasljednik srednjovjekovnih religijskih fanatika koji bi spaljivali ljude na lomači jer ne vjeruju u njihove religijske dogme i fantazije.

A uz to si i lud ko puška.

Nemam namjeru se upuštati u raspravu s tobom iako je dobro da se povremeno pojaviš čisto radi kontrasta.

Ti si najbolja reklama za početnu tezu teme.

Iako nebi trebalo bolesnog čovjeka iskorištavati u te stvari mislim da je korisno da ljudi vide.

Zaista mi je žao Enter zbog tvog stanja.

"Experts" Concerned Scientific Advances Are Giving Rise to ‘Neoracism’

Advances in genetic sequencing are giving rise to a new era of scientific racism, experts have said.

New forms of discrimination, known as “neoracism”, are taking hold in scientific research, spreading the belief that races exist and are different in terms of biology, behaviour and culture, according to anthropologists who spoke at the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science conference in Chicago.

This comes despite decades-long efforts to reverse attitudes that were used to justify the slave trade and the Nazi ideology.

http://www.amren.com/news/2014/02/exper ... ism%C2%92/

Eto ukratko odgovora zašto se plaše.

Zbog toga što su si zbog razlike među narodima i rasama neki zamislili da zbog toga mogu ubijati, tlačiti i istrebljivati one druge riješenje je da ignoriramo činjenice.

Ako se "znanost" ili znanost koristila da si opravdala zločine i genocid treba odbaciti znanost i voditi religijski rat da se "nepoćudne" činjenice gurnu u stranu.

A znanstvena istraživanja ćemo jednostavno odbaciti u korist ideologizirane narative i bajkovitih uvjerenja.

Iz ekstrema u ekstrem.

Kako je Kant zapisao:


Ne treba imati straha služiti se vlastitim razumom.

Razum nas je izvukao iz razdoblja mraka u kojem smo živjeli.

Neki bi nas očito tamo vratili.

Svijet je takav kakav je.

Treba ga prihvatiti, a ne ignorirati ono što nam se ne sviđa.

Guranjem glave u pijesak se svijet oko nas ne mijenja.

Samo mi ispadamo budale.

Koje sumoje dogme iz srednjeg veka?? , da čujem?? , jel ja pozivam na mržnju nekerase i naroda??
Ja samo mrzim takve kao ti jer mrzitelje treba mrzeti.

Kako je moguće da sam ja lud i nenormalan a ne mrzim nijedan narod i nijednu rasu , a ti si normalan je mrziš crnce i sve durge rasne smatrajući ih nižim bićima??

Objasni mi to i nikad ti više reč neću reći , jel imaš argumente ili samo laješ k'o pašče svezano??

Zbogom Enter. Želim ti da se izlječiš. Onda će ti možda mnoge stvari izgledati drugačije. Dok čovjek nije zdrav ništa drugo nije važno.

Sve najbolje.

Kao što sam i mislio, nikad nijedan mrzitelj,fašista i rasista nema ljudska i razumska objašnjenja za svoje stavove , jer mržnja nema opravdanja niti ikakve logike.

Mržnja i rasizam je zlo.

Coca-Cola’s America Is Beautiful Ad: Why Liberals Should Be Upset

Jill Filipovic, Guardian (London), February 3, 2014

My favorite Super Bowl commercial last night was Coca-Cola’s #AmericaIsBeautiful. The spot, shot with an Instragram-filter aesthetic, featured a multi-lingual rendition of “America the Beautiful” sung by children and illustrated with a diversity of New Americana scenes: a cowboy riding his horse, kids at the movies, teenagers on surfboards at dawn and breakdancing at dusk, headscarf-wearing young women buying food from a cart in Chinatown, two men in yarmulkes looking upon the newly-built Freedom Tower, a same-sex couple roller skating and hugging their daughter. I admit it, I teared up a bit. And I braced myself for the predictable right-wing outrage.

But perhaps those of us who care about inequality and racism should be angry, too. Coca-Cola’s diversity ad wasn’t purposed just to celebrate the reality of a multi-ethnic America. It was to sell soda to rapidly-expanding but vulnerable populations, even if that means contributing to serious health problems, exploiting divides in class and education, and exacerbating racial inequality.

Hispanic children are also more likely to be overweight or obese. Nearly 12% of Hispanic adults have diagnosed diabetes–by comparison, only 7% of non-Hispanic white Americans have diagnosed diabetes. Within Mexican-American and Puerto Rican populations, diabetes rates climb above 13%. African Americans, also target “heavy user” consumers for soda companies, have diabetes rates that hover around 12%. Perhaps most disturbingly, younger Latinos face higher rates of developing diabetes than any other group: Latina girls born in 2000 have a more than 50% chance of developing the disease in their lifetime.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... autiful-ad

Da se malo zabavimo. Kao da Jovica nije dovoljan.

I naše gore list zna igrati igru.

Umirem.

On gender and other agendas.

Kad nebi mislili ozbiljno bili bi genijalni.

Zapadna politički korektna moda.

Ako pripadnik manjine počini kazneno dijelo u izvještavanju se nikad ne spominje etnička pripadnost.

Ako pripadnik većine počini kazneno dijelo onda se slobodno naglašava etnička pripadnost i potencira se, pretjeruje manipulira da je to rezultat opresivnog većinskog razmišljanja.

Liberalizam uništava zapadnu civilizaciju.

A uz to je i glup.

Zašto “libertarijanska” a ne “liberalna čajdžinica”? Premda ne dijelim američko oduševljenje jezičnim kovanicama, riječ “libertarijanizam” mi je nekako zgodna zbog toga što pravi odmak od riječi “liberalizam”, koja je kod nas dosta korumpirana djelovanjem samozvanih “liberala”, pa se u nas liberalizam shvaća prvenstveno kao “socijalni liberalizam”. Ja nisam socijalni liberal. U socijalnom smislu sam prilično konzervativan, jer vjerujem u snagu društva i podupirem svaki otpor društva koji odbacuje etatističke projekte prosvjećivanja ljudi “odozgo”, raznim državnim projektima obrazovanja i kultivacije “neukog naroda”. Takve projekte je još Immanuel Kant s pravom opisao kao “najgori despotizam” i prinudno držanje ljudi u “stanju nezrelosti”. Društvo ima svoje vlastite mehanizme razvoja, svoje institucije koje je razvilo za to, država se tu ne smije miješati. Zbog toga mi je držai izraz “libertarijanizam”, jer libertarijanci žele svesti ulogu države na minimum, a državno obrazovanje slobodnih individua je za njih smiješan paradoks, na čije zavodljive parole ne žele nasjesti.

Drugi razlog zbog kojeg ovaj blog potpisujem kao libertarijanac, jest taj što su libertarijanci tržišni fundamentalisti, u čemu se u potpunosti slažem s njima. Tržišni fundamentalista ovdje znači da slobodu shvaćam kao isključivi temelj svih naših moralnih akcija, a budući da su jedino akcije temeljene na tržišnim principima slobodne, onda tržište smatram jedinim okvirom našeg moralnog djelovanja. Naime, slobodno tržište – ili, kako to marksisti krste, “kapitalizam” – jest, pored toga što je i najefikasniji, i jedini moralni okvir djelovanja slobodnih ljudi. Socijalisti vole reći da je njihov sustav moralan. No, to je sustav temeljen na prinudi, a morala nema tamo gdje nema slobode. Jedino slobodno tržište – a to znači slobodni pojedinci koji s drugim slobodnim pojedincima stupaju u različite socijalne aranžmane i prihvaćaju sve posljedice tih svojih aktivnosti – ima kvalitet slobode koji naše djelovanje može kvalificirati da bude moralno djelovanje. Sloboda je bezuvjetan uvjet naše moralnosti, i to je glavni razlog zbog kojeg slobodno tržište, ili kapitalizam, smatram jedinim moralnim ekonomskim sustavom koji je izumjelo čovječanstvo. Svaki drugi sustav, odnosno, generički shvaćen socijalizam, podrazumijeva nasilje i poništavanje slobode, te stoga zavrjeđuje našu osudu.

Zašto “čajdžinica”? Pa, u moru svih ovih ravolucionarnih i “revolucionarnih” previranja u svijetu, odnosno, serije manje ili više uspješnih državnih udara, jedini pokret “odozdo”, koji je kod mene izazvao oduševljenje, jest američki Tea Party pokret. Milioni ljudi na ulici, koji zahtijevaju od države da im se skine s grbače, to je prizor koji kod svakog ljubitelja slobode mora izazvati ushićenje. To je, uostalom, i jedini socijalni bunt ili pokret koji smatram poželjnim u hrvatskom društvu. Odlaziti na Markov trg i tražiti od države ovo ili ono svoje ugroženo “pravo”, a u stvari privilegiju, nije djelovanje dostojno slobodnog čovjeka. Država nam ne može podariti niti jedno pravo. Naše pravo je ono za što se izborimo ili dogovorimo s drugim ljudima kao slobodni ljudi. Od države možemo zahtijevati samo da nam ne ugrožava našu slobodu. Kada imaju slobodu, odrasli ljudi se za sve drugo, prije svega za svoje obitelji i sebe, brinu sami.

http://blog.vecernji.hr/borislav-ristic ... u-i-blogu/

Ima i blog.

Me like.

Postoje razni tipovi liberala, pa jednim djelom sam i ja liberal.