ŠTA ZAPRAVO ŽELI ISIL

Piše :Haskić Senad

Negdje početkom 90-ih godina prošlog stoljeća ,počelo je po raznim visoko sofisticiranim političkim mjestima ,kružiti priča o podjeli Iraka na tri dijela i zapravo ta priča,sve se više pojačavala sa planiranim uklanjanjem Sadama Huseina sa vlasti.

Taj plan prvobitne podjele ,trebao je da izgleda ovako:

1.-Kurdima sjever
2.-Šiitima jug
3.-Sunitima nekakva središnjica Iraka.
Formiranje Islamske Države Irak i Levant,isključivo se veže za rad Iračkih obavještajaca,koji su u ovoj skupini vidjeli nadu nekakvog većeg otpora sve izvjesnijoj američkoj invaziji i koja je trebala da djeluje na logistiku okupacionih snaga iza prve linije fronta.
Medjutim brzi pad Sadamovog režima ,ostavlja ovu organizaciju na „ničijoj zemlji“i oni se priključuju Al-Qaidi u namjeri borbe protiv“dušmana Islama“,ali često djelujući po svom nahodjenju i protiv naredbi koje su stizale i Osaminog štaba.
Rat u Siriji,donio je jednu zamagljenu sliku ISILA,koja ni danas nije baš najjasnija i vrlo je često glavna tema stručnih analiza koje redovno završavaju onako kako se i počelo,VELIKOM TAJNOM,posebno nakon izbacivanja ove organizacije iz Al – Qaide.
Medjutim, nedavna dešavanja u Iraku,donekle su dale mogućnost uvida u dijelovanje Islamske Države Irak i Levant,shodno svjedočenju ljudi iz gradova koje je ISIL stavio pod svoju kontrolu.

Ova izuzetno vojno sposobna organizacija svoj pravi bum u Iraku doživljava na osnovu neke iskrivljene slike ugroženosti i frustriranosti Sunita ,raspodijelom vlasti u državi i njihovim, navodnim ugnjetavanjem od strane Kurda i Šiita.
Za voj strahovit uspjeh u osvajanju velikog dijela Iračkog teritorija,pripadnici ISILA,sa Abu Bakrom al Baghdadijem na čelu ipak moraju zahvaliti Ezzat Ibrahim al-Douriju,jedinom višem oficiru Sadamove vojske,koji je još u bijegu I zapovijednikom snažne milicije pod nazivom Naqshbandi,grupe koja se I danas oslanja na ideologiju Baath partije,bivšeg Iračkog lidera,sa kojim je ISIL prije par mijeseci sklopio savez.
Takodjer ISIL,je naišao na snažnu podršku Sunitskog naroda ,koji je sam propast Iraka sebi predočio kroz podredjeni položaj u odnosu na Šiite I Kurde I u ovoj organizaciji vidi nekakvu svoju oslobodilačku vojsku,nešto slično kao što Sirijski narod vidi spasioca u svojoj SAA.
Pored ovog,ISIL zaista na terenu nije imao ni dostojnog protivnika,nakon što su Američke invazionističke snage rasturile Iračku vojsku,svodeći je na nivo stražarske službe,koja treba samo da obezbjedjuje njihove vitalne interese.
Ono što je bitno istaći,da se ovoj,možemo slobodno reći armiji,do sada jedino suprostavila Kurdska paramilicija Pašmarq,koja ih je čak uspijela poraziti u bitci za Kirkuk.
Medjutim jako je bitno posmatrati I ostale države u regionu I vidjeti reakcije na širenje ISILA,koji se može lahko ,shodno sve većem prilivu novih boraca infiltrirati I u njihovu unutrašnjost razvijajući oblike kriza do samih oružanih sukoba.
Turska,Bahrein,Libija su zemlje koje predstavljaju potencijalnu metu ISIL-ovih planera I mogućnost aktiviranja svojih ljudi u ovim državama bliskog okruženja.
SAD,grčevito traže saveznika u regionu koji bi ovo pitanje mogao riješiti bez upotrebe Američke vojske,koja po stavovima Kongresa,ne smije ni pomisliti na neku ponovnu akciju I njen povratak na tlo ove Bliskoistočne države.

IRAN

Iran je ta država koja može ISILU stati u kraji mada zvanični Teheran nije zadovoljan širenjem ove grupacije,do sada nije poduzeo nikakve korake u njenom suzbijanju,čekajući reakciju upravo Wašingtona I formiranju nekakvog saveza prêd opasnošću koja se nalazi na manje od 100 km od Bagdada.

Zašto Iran?

Odgovor je prilično jasan I konkretan I samim tim daje jasnu sliku moćne države koja je neprikosnovena u aktiviranju svojih intersnih područja I ne samo utjecaju na grupe direktno povezane sa Iranom već I na svu elastičnost I praksu ovakve vrste opasnosti.
Iran ima I moć I mogućnost zaustaviti ISIL,bez direktnog miješanja na teritoriji Iraka,a kao potvrda ove teze ,najbolja nam je slika takvog djelovanja u Siriji.

ŠTA ŽELI ISIL ?

ISIL,želi zauzeti Irak,želi povratiti Sunitsku dominaciju u većinski Šiitskoj državi I želi povratiti odnos kakav je bio za vrijeme Sadama Huseina,potpuno odbacujući akt nacionalnog jedinstva I ravnopravnosti.
Posebno dobru podlogu,ovom precizno izradjenom planu,odigrao je Sunitski kler koji je konstantno potpirivao taj stepen ugroženosti ove vjerske skupine,stvarajući tako potencijalno nove ratnike I omogučavajući da se ratna dešavanja u ovoj državi samo nastave uz veliko prolijevanje krvi.
Ali u svemu ovome,ostaje jedna nepoznanica I jedno logično pitanje se nameće samo po sebi – Ko zapravo finansira ISIL?

Ono što svaki rat sa sobom nosi,neprirodna savezništva,donio je I u ovu nekada prebogatu zemlju tj,donio je savezništvo izmedju Islamske Države Irak I Levant I Saudijske Arabije,a neprirodan je iz čisto jednog jedinog razloga – Isil najvećim dijelom čine Iračani I žele povrat odnosa I nastavak djela Sadama Huseina I S.Arabije koja je istog tog čovijeka uz pomoć SAD-a I ubila.
S.Arabija finansira ovu skupinu uz pomoć selefijskih zajednica,računajući da instaliranjem upravo ovih vehabijskih organizacija,postepeno I preuzme dominaciju u Iraku I da osnaženim snagama ponovno krene na ugrožavanje suvereniteta država u okruženju,kao što su Sirija,Iran,Libija… Medjutim,kao I svaka više frakcijska skupina ,tako I ISIL,veoma lako može zapasti u problem razmimoilaženja I sukobljavanja,pa tako posljednje informacije koje dolaze sa terena I govore da je trenutno stanje u ovoj “armada” prilično konfuzno,zbog sukoba izmedju starog , bivšeg generala Iračke vojske Ezzat Ibrahim al-Dourija I lidera ISILA Baghdadia,zbog pravca kretanja I želje Dourija da se što prije krene na Bagdad.
Naime Abu Bakr,želi osvojiti ostala područja a onda koncentriranim snagama izvršiti napad na glavni grad,dok Douri smatra da je to gubljenje vremena I da će snage biti razvučene i da treba preskočiti osvajanje susjednih područja kako udar ne bi izgubio na snazi I intenzitetu.

Ovaj krhki savez izmedju dvije paramilicijske skupine,možda je I najveći adut I Iračke vlade a I zemalja koje žele zaustaviti širenje ISILA I po nekim procjenama zapravo predstavlja prvi stepen Iranske umiješanosti koja se I odnosi na stvaranje doze nepovjerenja medju savezničkim snagama.
Medjutim svi ovi stavovi su još uvijek u sferi nagadjanja I ne predstavljaju,neku zvaničnu ekspertizu trenutnih dešavanja,ali se moraju posmatrati iz ugla prihvatljivosti.
Opasnost ,koja je tragična za ovu zemlju,jeste da ISIL svakim danom postaje nekom vrstom BRENDA I da puni stupce svjetskih medija,a samim tim postaje magnet za razne indoktrinisane ljude I potencijlno nove “borce”,koji mogu donijeti samo još veće potoke krvi I nove zločine I masakre koji su svoju potvrdu imali I u susjednoj Siriji.

Ono što sam u jednoj analizi ,prije otprilike godinu dana najavio riječima-“Crni se oblaci gomilaju nad Irakom”,dobilo je na žalost ,odnedavno I svoju potvrdu u vidu ISIL-ovog zauzimanja odredjenih područja I spremanja za veliki udar na Bagdad,a sve u okviru iskrivljene politike SAD-a I njenih zapadnih prijatelja spram država B.Istoka.
U Siriji je kriza dovela radikalizam veoma blizu Zapadu. Nekad je to bio periferni problem, ali sad su te snage nakon pada režima u državama počev od Libije pa do Iraka dobile prostor za svoje djelovanje.
Pad državnog poretka u nekoj zemlji je poput sunca za suncokret. Na taj način idealistički pristupi uklanjanju ISIL-a mogu jednostavno zakazati. Strategija će uključivati sinhroniziranu akciju različitih opcija što neće biti nimalo lahko provesti u djelo. Pogotovo kad se ima na umu da to podrazumijeva i uključivanje nekih neželjenih aktera kakakv je sirijski predsjednik Bašar al-Assad.

I na kraju šta poručiti napaćenom Iračkom narodu?

Ništa što bi zdrav razum mogao prihvatiti,osim ono možda I najbitnije-NEKA VAM JE DRAGI BOG U POMOĆI…

I na kraju šta poručiti napaćenom Iračkom narodu?

Isil jihadists 'offered teenager $25,000 to carry out bombings in Vienna'
A 14-year-old boy suspected of planning a series of bombings in Vienna reportedly offered $25,000 (£16,000) by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant to carry out attacks
By Justin Huggler, Berlin8:18PM GMT 30 Oct 2014

A 14-year-old boy suspected of planning a series of bombings in Vienna was reported on Thursday to have been offered $25,000 (£16,000) by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil) to carry out the attacks amid claims that two other youths recruited in the same way remain at large.

The arrested youth has not been named by authorities, but has been identified by the Austrian media as Mertkan G, the son of Turkish immigrants, who has lived in the country for eight years. He was arrested on Tuesday but details are only now emerging about his case.
Among the sites in which he has admitted planning to plant explosives is Vienna's Westbahnhof station, one of the busiest in the country, used by 40,000 travellers each day.
Austrian officials have refused to comment on reports that he was recruited over the internet by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and promised a payment for carrying out the bombings. But a spokesman for prosecutors said that the 14-year-old was in touch with "various different contacts".
He had confessed to planning to plant a series of bombs in crowded areas around Vienna, said Michaela Obenaus, a spokesman for the prosecutors' office in the boy's home city of St Pölten.

Despite his youth, he reportedly reconnoitred potential target sites "like a professional". He is not believed to have built any bombs by the time of his arrest, but he had researched bomb-making extensively on the internet, and made specific inquiries about purchasing certain parts.
The Austrian authorities have spoken only of "unconventional explosive devices", but, according to local media reports, he was planning to build improvised cluster bombs similar to those used in the 2013 Boston marathon bombings.
It appears he was not planning a suicide attack: he has reportedly confessed that he wanted to travel to Syria to fight alongside jihadist groups there, and saw a successful bombing campaign as his ticket to join.

A report in Kronen Zeitung newspaper claimed that he was actively recruited over the internet by Isil and promised a "special position" as a reward for carrying out the bombings, as well as the payment of $25,000. The newspaper claimed that two other youths were recruited to carry out attacks in similar fashion and remained at large.
But other local newspapers reported that Austrian investigators believed Mertkan G may have been a so-called "lone wolf", working entirely on his own. The boy, who lived with his parents in St Pölten, a small city not far from Vienna, was known locally for speaking out in favour of Isil and other jihadist groups, but the reports said his friends did not take him seriously.
His plans were reportedly uncovered after concerned teachers at his school contacted police to say he had been speaking threateningly. After that, Austrian intelligence began monitoring his internet activity. He has been remanded in custody while investigations continue.

Ex-imam: Islamic State “animated entirely by Islam. The manner in which they kill – prescribed and outlined in the Koran.”

FEBRUARY 10, 2015 10:52 AM BY ROBERT SPENCER

President Barack Obama sparked outrage when he compared medieval Christian wars to modern-day Islamic terrorism at the National Prayer Breakfast Thursday. He spouted that terrorist groups like ISIS “professed to stand up for Islam, but, in fact, are betraying it,” chastising the opposition from getting on “our high horse” when “people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ” during the Crusades and Spanish Inquisition.

Dr. Mark Christian, founder of Global Faith Institute, knows Islamic history too well, being an apostate from the Muslim faith himself. Having experienced the true nature of Islam firsthand as a devout Imam, Dr. Christian penned a fiery open letter to the American leader, which he graciously provided to Mad World News, that includes a blunt history lesson in the unchanging goal of ancient Islam:

President Obama… I realize you thought you were brave and courageous when you defamed Christianity by equating the Crusades and the Inquisition with the present-day barbarism of Islam, but I wonder if your “courage” goes so far as to blame Muslims for the Islamic conquests? Do you have the guts to tell them that in the name of Allah, they invaded nations, practiced ethnic and cultural cleansing, going so far as to erase the very history of conquered lands. Can you tell them that they changed languages and names, enslaved millions and killed an unknowable number of innocent souls simply because they worshiped God, and not “Allah?”. I think not. You know Christians will bow their heads and pray for you whereas Muslims will simply take your head and celebrate.

ISIS is not animated by the usual “reaction to oppression” narrative the Left trots out as an excuse for every instance of horrible behavior, whether that behavior is rioting in Ferguson, Missouri or the systematic slaughter of all those opposed to your ideology.

ISIS is animated entirely by Islam. The manner in which they kill – prescribed and outlined in the Koran. The way they make war – prescribed and outlined in the Koran. The way they treat prisoners – also prescribed and outlined in the Koran.

ISIS does nothing that Mohammed didn’t first do 14 centuries ago.

You see, the problem isn’t a “radical interpretation of Islam,” the problem is the belief in Islam that Mohammed was the “perfect man,” and as such, worthy of emulation in all things.

Until Islam can recognize that their “perfect man” wasn’t perfect, and both did and ordered horrible things to be done – certainly things that have no place in a modern world – then there will always be an ISIS. There will always be those who dedicate their lives to imitating the man who spawned the greatest killing machine in known history…Islam.

Mike Konrad, the pen name of a colleague at American Thinker, has done the math for us in a remarkably cogent piece that deserved far more attention than it received when first published in early 2014.

The President drew a moral equivalence argument at this year’s National Prayer Breakfast between the predation of Islam and the actions of Christians during the Crusades and the Inquisition. The President is not uneducated. He is surely aware of the speciousness of that argument, yet still proffered it as a back-handed justification of the profane brutality of ISIS and other Islamic supremacist groups.

When we think of genocide, the names that spring to mind are Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot. Of course Mao and his utopian fantasies deserve a place alongside the other luminaries of human devastation; millions suffered and died because of these men.

But, when one looks a bit deeper we discover that when it comes to dealing death, the aforementioned dictators are mere peddlers compared to Islam. People forget that the Islamic conquests began 400 years before the Crusades, which were largely a response to Islamic aggression.

Beginning in the year 1000 and lasting for another 500 years, Islam attempted to depopulate India. They did a remarkably good job of it, as the overall population of the Indian subcontinent (despite very high birthrates) dropped by an estimated 80 million in that period.

Don’t forget that Islam has always been a leader in the trafficking of humans – from the slave trade to present-day prostitution – Muslims have excelled in the sale of their fellows.

Just under 30 million slaves from Africa were held in the Middle East and considering the death rate of slaves in transport (an estimated 80%!) Arab Muslim traders would’ve needed more than a 100 million to have provided the number of slaves we know survived.

While Christianity is forever maligned for forced conversions and bad behavior in Africa, in truth, Muslims performed these atrocities on a scale many orders of magnitude greater, and continued to do so for more than a thousand years.

Of course, we shan’t forget the Islamic slaughter in Sudan, the methodical murder and sexual slavery ongoing in Nigeria or the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians by Muslim Turks at the turn of the 20th century.

When Mohammed began his spread of Islam, most of North Africa and all of Europe was Christian. Where are they now? According to the Catholic Education Resource Center, there are no remaining communities of Christians that can trace their roots back to antiquity. Over the span of centuries, this number adds up to millions more dead, at the hands of Islam.

According to Mr. Konrad,

“Possibly one-third to one-half or more of all those killed by war or slavery in history can be traced to Islam.”

The totals boggle the mind. By a conservative estimate, Islam is directly responsible for a quarter of a BILLION dead. Indirectly, hundreds of millions more.

To quote Mr. Konrad,

“Unlike the 20th-century totalitarians whose killing fury consumed themselves, reducing their longevity, Islam paces itself. In the end, though slower, Islam has killed and tortured far more than any other creed – religious or secular. Unlike secular tyranny, Islam, by virtue of its polygamy and sexual predation, reproduces itself and increases.”

Other tyrannies are furious infections, which burn hot, but are soon overcome. Islam is a slow terminal cancer, which metastasizes, and takes over. It never retreats. Its methods are more insidious, often imperceptible at first, driven by demographics. Like cancer, excision may be the only cure.

Mohammed is the “perfect man” of Islam, and as such is the role model for every Muslim. Looking at the horrors perpetrated by Mohammed, it becomes crystal clear that the more devout the Muslim, the more depraved and regressive their behavior.

There is no justification, no moral equivalence to be drawn between the behavior of Christians a thousand years ago, and the behavior of Muslims today. The more salient point is that while the predation of Christianity died away, the worst of Islamic practices are on the rise.

So Mr. President, please focus your attention toward a real problem – Islamic supremacism – the rest of us have the Crusades and the Inquisition under control.

Religious radicalisation – it's sudden, secret and unexpected

The slide into religious radicalisation takes just three to six months and usually happens in secret, Muslim youth workers have revealed.

But Kuranda Seyit, founder of the Forum on Australia's Islamic Relations, said his experience of working with young Muslims showed most people simply got over their extreme views after a few months if they had the right intervention.

Mr Seyit has coaxed one man back home from the Turkey-Syria border and will soon begin focus groups to build on the limited research on the profile of young Australians who are turning radical.

His insights shed light on the case of two Sydney friends, Omar al-Kutobi, 24, and Mohammad Kiad, 25, who were arrested on Tuesday allegedly just hours before committing an Islamic State-inspired killing.

They pair allegedly recorded a video in their Fairfield granny flat of Mr Kutobi kneeling in front of a homemade Islamic State flag, holding a machete and hunting knife and vowing to attack a white person on Tuesday, police revealed in a media conference.

They had never been on any intelligence radars and showed no signs of extremism until the last few months, neighbours and family members said.

Mr Seyit said radicalisation happens rapidly, usually in a few months, and often in secret.

It is usually prompted by a particular event, like the Charlie Hebdo shooting or a key battle overseas, or a spike in propaganda material coming from conflict hotbeds like Syria that is then shared around on social media.

"There's a sense of euphoria that goes with it ... young people get riled up, some feel frustration that nothing is being done [and] with some young guys there is a sense of bravado and duty that they have to do something about it," he said.

Most will begin looking up articles online and listening to YouTube videos. Some might begin posting more hardline views on Facebook or buy an ISIS flag to hang in their bedroom.

They tend to criticise others for not being religious enough and hide everything from their parents.

"Their minds can change fairly quickly," he said.

But most young men will simply get over the short-lived phase if someone can see the signs and intervene. If not, they can easily be recruited by a hardline organisation or become aggressive and violent.

"It takes a reality check of some sort – a brother or sister or sheikh convincing them this is not the way to solve the problem".

Mr Seyit stressed that the problem only exists in a small minority of the community.

Mr Kutobi and Mr Kiad were generally normal, open-minded men who often had barbecues with friends in their backyard and loved ordering pizza, according to a neighbour who only wanted to be known as Michael.

However, Michael believed the September pre-dawn counter-terrorism raids in Sydney and the Lindt Cafe siege in December took a heavy toll on both.

Neighbours said they were glued to their television watching endless coverage of the siege and started behaving differently afterwards. They were more aggressive to neighbours and started wearing religious robes and growing their beards.

Hass Dellal, executive director of the Australian Multicultural Foundation, said his observations of radicalisation were similar to Mr Seyit's.

"It happens very quickly," he said.

His organisation rolled out a program 10 months ago that trains teachers, community leaders, parents and young people to spot the signs of radicalisation and intervene.

The program, funded as part of the Attorney General's anti-extremism program, uses a three-tier model to assess changes in someone's social relations, ideology and criminal orientation.

Counter-terrorism researcher Anne (Azza) Aly, from Curtin University, is also pushing for the roll-out of a deradicalisation program successfully used in Germany with neo-Nazis and white supremacists.

She said radicalisation tended to involve a group or hive mentality.

The Attorney General's Department said it was committing more money to early intervention as part of its $13.4 million Countering Violent Extremism package.

To take one example: In September, Sheikh Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, the Islamic State’s chief spokesman, called on Muslims in Western countries such as France and Canada to find an infidel and “smash his head with a rock,” poison him, run him over with a car, or “destroy his crops.” To Western ears, the biblical-sounding punishments—the stoning and crop destruction—juxtaposed strangely with his more modern-sounding call to vehicular homicide. (As if to show that he could terrorize by imagery alone, Adnani also referred to Secretary of State John Kerry as an “uncircumcised geezer.”)

But Adnani was not merely talking trash. His speech was laced with theological and legal discussion, and his exhortation to attack crops directly echoed orders from Muhammad to leave well water and crops alone—unless the armies of Islam were in a defensive position, in which case Muslims in the lands of kuffar, or infidels, should be unmerciful, and poison away.

The reality is that the Islamic State is Islamic. Very Islamic. Yes, it has attracted psychopaths and adventure seekers, drawn largely from the disaffected populations of the Middle East and Europe. But the religion preached by its most ardent followers derives from coherent and even learned interpretations of Islam.

Virtually every major decision and law promulgated by the Islamic State adheres to what it calls, in its press and pronouncements, and on its billboards, license plates, stationery, and coins, “the Prophetic methodology,” which means following the prophecy and example of Muhammad, in punctilious detail. Muslims can reject the Islamic State; nearly all do. But pretending that it isn’t actually a religious, millenarian group, with theology that must be understood to be combatted, has already led the United States to underestimate it and back foolish schemes to counter it. We’ll need to get acquainted with the Islamic State’s intellectual genealogy if we are to react in a way that will not strengthen it, but instead help it self-immolate in its own excessive zeal.

According to Haykel, the ranks of the Islamic State are deeply infused with religious vigor. Koranic quotations are ubiquitous. “Even the foot soldiers spout this stuff constantly,” Haykel said. “They mug for their cameras and repeat their basic doctrines in formulaic fashion, and they do it all the time.” He regards the claim that the Islamic State has distorted the texts of Islam as preposterous, sustainable only through willful ignorance. “People want to absolve Islam,” he said. “It’s this ‘Islam is a religion of peace’ mantra. As if there is such a thing as ‘Islam’! It’s what Muslims do, and how they interpret their texts.” Those texts are shared by all Sunni Muslims, not just the Islamic State. “And these guys have just as much legitimacy as anyone else.”

All Muslims acknowledge that Muhammad’s earliest conquests were not tidy affairs, and that the laws of war passed down in the Koran and in the narrations of the Prophet’s rule were calibrated to fit a turbulent and violent time. In Haykel’s estimation, the fighters of the Islamic State are authentic throwbacks to early Islam and are faithfully reproducing its norms of war. This behavior includes a number of practices that modern Muslims tend to prefer not to acknowledge as integral to their sacred texts. “Slavery, crucifixion, and beheadings are not something that freakish [jihadists] are cherry-picking from the medieval tradition,” Haykel said. Islamic State fighters “are smack in the middle of the medieval tradition and are bringing it wholesale into the present day.”

The Koran specifies crucifixion as one of the only punishments permitted for enemies of Islam. The tax on Christians finds clear endorsement in the Surah Al-Tawba, the Koran’s ninth chapter, which instructs Muslims to fight Christians and Jews “until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” The Prophet, whom all Muslims consider exemplary, imposed these rules and owned slaves.

Leaders of the Islamic State have taken emulation of Muhammad as strict duty, and have revived traditions that have been dormant for hundreds of years. “What’s striking about them is not just the literalism, but also the seriousness with which they read these texts,” Haykel said. “There is an assiduous, obsessive seriousness that Muslims don’t normally have.”

@Ministry of Sound

Naširoko se pojavio problem - borba protiv ekstremizma. Nitko ne govori kakvog ekstremizma, kao da je ekstremizam sam sebi izvor. To je problem. Problem je i to što se nedjela i zločini Islamske Države relativiziraju, uspoređuju itd. Zapadne države djeluju u krivom smjeru, ne udaraju u srž problema. Imam dojam kao da je prvi cilj nepovrijediti muslimane u Europi (razne imigrante), nego se obračunati s Islamskom Državom. Problemi se rješavaju in capite et in membris. Netko treba reći da problem jest islam. Da je ta religija u krizi, i da treba stisnut srce i rješavat probleme u islamu. Upitno je uvelike može li se uopće ta religija reformirati, pod velikim upitnikom. Ja smatram da ne može, sve ostalo je nakaradno prilagođavanje muslimana zapadnim vrijednostima. Selektivno biranje iz Kur'ana da se netko osjeća bolje, to je.

Došli smo pred zid - ideja multikulturalizma se ruši, konačno ovaj put.

Žao mi je kršćana na Bliskom Istoku, ali ISIS je dar s nebesa za zapad.

Kao prvo, svi forumaši i birtijaši imaju kompleks superiornosti u odnosu na političare i njihove savjetnike da je to čudo jedno. Najveći globalni problemi i idile se riješe između dvije ture pića. Forumaši i birtijaši (s balkana pogotovo) su iskusni i prepredeni ljudi, sve znaju, sve vide, a političari i njihovi savjetnici su ideološki zaslijepljeni idioti koji skoro bez iznimke prave pacerske greške.

To je neki moj sažetak vašeg viđenja zapada i zapadnih političara.

Sve što mogu poručiti je da trebate upoznati savjetnike savjetnika tih političara, kako bi se osjećali glupi i nedostojni.

Budite uvjereni da je svaka vaša sugestija, savjet i mišljenje, uz 100-ak drugih stvari koje vam nikada i neće pasti na pamet, bila razmatrana i odbačena.

Odluka koja je na kraju donesena može biti pogrešna ili točna nakon što se podigne "fog of war", ali je u trenutku kada je donesena bila optimalna, tj. bila bazirana na svim raspoloživim inputima i simulacijama posljedica.

TLDR: Političar na vrhu piramide u izvršnoj vlasti je 1000x informiraniji i pametniji od najboljeg što ima ponuditi i birtija i foruma.

Elem, što se tiče ISIS-a, strategija javnog inzistiranja na tome da ISIS "ne predstavlja Islam" je apsolutno najoptimalnija moguća strategija u ovom trenutku, jer onemogućuje zbijanje muslimanskih redova pred jedinstvenom "križarskom" prijetnjom. Svaka zapadna javna kritika Islama, proglašavanje Islama kao problema ili poziva na reformaciju će biti dočekana na nož i biti katalizator za zbližavanje raznih "rogova u vreći" i za sveopću blokovsku podjelu.

Ovako zapad kulira, tu i tamo bombardira ISIS, no to je unutarmuslimanski rat koji će unazaditi, a možda u konačnici i uništiti bliski istok. Već su nepovratno uništene 3 vrlo jake arapske zemlje, a tu vjerojatno nije kraj. I tako su zabavljeni sami sa sobom, a intenzitet napada na zapadne mete je nikakav kakav bi bio da je Bliski Istok "šerijatski stabilan" i fokusiran na širenje van svojih granica. Žao mi je kršćana na Bliskom Istoku, ali ISIS je dar s nebesa za zapad.

Prema ovome što ti govoriš ispada da je u povijesti bilo nemoguće donijeti štetne odluke, jer se sve 100% izanalizira i donese najbolja odluka od 50 000 savjetnika, a druga svtvar, pričaš kao da ne postoje kritičari tog istog na vrhu izvršne vlasti koji je 1000x puta pametniji od sviju i svakoga. Kao da njegovi kritičari nisu možda 3x pametniji od njega. Pri tome ne mislim na birtijaše ili forumaše.

Rekli ne rekli da predstavlja islam, takav je dojam još od Iračkog rata, i već brojni analitičari tvrde da će se muslimani u Europi polako poći distancirati. I treba pozvati na reformu islama, ne preko zapadnih političara, već regrutirati određene islamske teologe. Inače će stalo postojati prijetnja od radikalnog islama. Prijetnja je međunarodni terorizam više nego bliski istok.