Ej, ajde ne seri... rekao sam vecina. A ako i nije prirodan, ne znaci odmah da je stetan... joj sto volim ove teoreticare zavjera...

Ej, ajde ne seri... rekao sam vecina. A ako i nije prirodan, ne znaci odmah da je stetan... joj sto volim ove teoreticare zavjera...

Forget it.
Nemam živaca.

FDA Statement on European Aspartame Study
CFSAN/Office of Food Additive Safety
April 20, 2007

FDA has completed its review concerning the long-term carcinogenicity study of aspartame entitled, "Long-Term Carcinogenicity Bioassays to Evaluate the Potential Biological Effects, in Particular Carcinogenic, of Aspartame Administered in Feed to Sprague-Dawley Rats," conducted by the European Ramazzini Foundation (ERF), located in Bologna, Italy. FDA reviewed the study data made available to them by ERF and finds that it does not support ERF's conclusion that aspartame is a carcinogen. Additionally, these data do not provide evidence to alter FDA's conclusion that the use of aspartame is safe.

Aspartame was first approved in the United States in 1981 and is one of the most widely used artificial sweeteners. When metabolized by the body, aspartame is broken down into two common amino acids, aspartic acid and phenylalanine, and a third substance, methanol. These three substances are available in similar or greater amounts from eating common foods.

Upon first learning of the ERF study results, FDA requested the data from ERF to evaluate the findings. On February 28, 2006, the agency received only a portion of the study data requested. In June 2006, FDA asked ERF to provide the remainder of the study data initially requested and also offered to review pathology slides from the study. ERF did not submit additional data to FDA and did not agree to FDA's review of the pathology slides.

FDA could not conduct a complete and definitive review of the study because ERF did not provide the full study data. Based on the available data, however, we have identified significant shortcomings in the design, conduct, reporting, and interpretation of this study. FDA finds that the reliability and interpretation of the study outcome is compromised by these shortcomings and uncontrolled variables, such as the presence of infection in the test animals.

Additionally, the data that were provided to FDA do not appear to support the aspartame-related findings reported by ERF. Based on our review, pathological changes were incidental and appeared spontaneously in the study animals, and none of the histopathological changes reported appear to be related to treatment with aspartame. FDA believes that additional insight on the study findings could be provided by an internationally-sponsored pathology working group examination of appropriate tissue slides from the study.

Considering results from the large number of studies on aspartame's safety, including five previously conducted negative chronic carcinogenicity studies, a recently reported large epidemiology study with negative associations between the use of aspartame and the occurrence of tumors, and negative findings from a series of three transgenic mouse assays, FDA finds no reason to alter its previous conclusion that aspartame is safe as a general purpose sweetener in food.

Sada uopšte nije vreme lubenicama.

Zasto?Ovdje ih mozes u svakom supermarketu kupiti.Ne mozes se ravnati po Vojvodini jer postoje zemlje koje se bave uzgojem lubenica a imaju topliju klimu! Mislim da i one u dolini Neretve puno ranije od vojvodjanskih sazrijevaju.

Pa nemam ni ja vise... Rekao sam "vecina"... ti "light" proizvodi su poznati kao prica za sebe, ja te proizvode isto izbjegavam. Sta je prava pozadina oko toga tesko je reci, al Wiki sigurno nije tu nikakvo mjerilo... Al da, vecina tih aditiva je potpuno prirodna, opet kazem, VECINA.

Ja recimo izbjegavam light proizvode upravo iz tog razloga... Al skoro da nema proizvoda... od vina, sladoleda, cokolade, bilo koje sunke, salame, kreme za lice, brijanje, dezodoransi... itd. a da je bez aditiva... NEMA. Cak i dimljeno meso ima aditive koji su potencijalno kancerogeni, i koji nastaju "prirodno", dok se meso susi. Ti te stvari skoro da i ne mozes izbjeci, osim ako neces ici loviti divljeg vepra nakon posla i pojesti ga onako svjezeg (ali i sirovog, jer ako ga peces, eto ti opet kancerogenih tvari).

Al svakako ih mozes svesti na minimum, i malo procitati sta pise na proizvodu, i znati sta ces uzeti, a sta neces...

Nemam namjeru poljuljati tvoj 'consumer confidence', jer imam dojam da bi ti pojeo i cipelu, da na njoj stoji deklaracija za prehrambeni proizvod.
Ako sadržaj piše na ambalaži, it must be true... well, duh!
Not really.

Pa nije čovjek sasvim u krivu, bilo je dosad puno nezakonitih radnji i nepravilnosti, često i uz suradnju državnih organa, kako bi se zaobišli propisi i ostvarila korist. Multinacionalne kompanije su tu posebno jake.

Britney, jesi to ti?

Alo, pricas gluposti... ne znam kakve to vezu ima s ovim trenutno, a i ne zanima me, iskreno da ti kazem...

Ne, u pravu si, sve je to jedna velika zavjera & urota, i bolje je poslusati sta neko pise na Wikipediji i onda sta se copy/pajesta unedogled (kao sad ti), nego sta kaze jedna ugledna agencija koja nadgleda ispravnost svega toga... Al naravno, ja ni to nisam govorio nego nesto sasvim drugo... al nema veze.

Nezdrava hrana, puna najblaže rečeno, kontraverznih hemikalija, skraćuje životni vijek čovjeka (u nekim slučajevima izaziva i trajni sterilitet) i povećava mogućnost bolesti koju sam konzumer genetski nosi kao predispoziciju (koji se ne bi aktivirao uz zdravu, prirodnu hranu). Takva nezdrava hrana (GMO i ostala sranja) ima trigger effect, i sama po sebi nije klasično trovanje. Jer klasično trovanje izaziva paniku. Ovako postiže željeni efekt. Jer ti nitko neće pasti mrtav pod nos. Kao što i Srbija danas direktno i uglavnom umire od malignih bolesti, a ne od NATO-vog osiromašenog uranijuma? Superb logic.

Jedem šta mi se jede u datom trenutku,bez obzira bilo to zdravo ili nezdravo.
Sinoć na roštilju,raspričali se kako je meso uopće ne treba ljudskom organizmu,kako je povrće,voće,soja ono šta je uistinu zdravo.
I tako,riječ po riječ,nestade bataka i ćevapa za tren

Te nutricioniste treba zaobilaziti u sirokom luku...

Odosmo sa teme...kvaka je što prehrambena industrija radi da bi povećala profit,a na uštrb kvaliteta i zdravlja...Kemija je preuzela primat u toj grani.Posljedice vidimo na zdravlju "pučanstva".

Pa ne mora biti nuzno na ustrb ni kvalitete, ni zdravlja... stvar je kao sto rekoh da losije namirnice kostaju manje. Moze potpuno prirodna namirnica biti nezdrava, Nema tu nikakvog mudrovanja.

Proslo je vrijeme klasicnog uzgoja zivotinja i sl., treba sav svijet prehraniti... i danas su mnogi ljudi gladni...